These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

414 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11084561)

  • 1. Adjustment for case mix in comparisons of cesarean delivery rates: university versus community hospitals in Vermont.
    Whitsel AI; Capeless EC; Abel DE; Stuart GS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Nov; 183(5):1170-5. PubMed ID: 11084561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Indications for labor induction. Differences between university and community hospitals.
    Beebe LA; Rayburn WF; Beaty CM; Eberly KL; Stanley JR; Rayburn LA
    J Reprod Med; 2000 Jun; 45(6):469-75. PubMed ID: 10900580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cesarean deliveries at a university hospital: analysis of rates and indications.
    Pollard JK; Capeless EL
    Am J Perinatol; 1997 May; 14(5):245-8. PubMed ID: 9259936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical case mix adjustment of cesarean delivery rates in U.S. military hospitals, 2002.
    Linton A; Peterson MR; Williams TV
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):598-606. PubMed ID: 15738031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of managed care enrollment on primary and repeat cesarean rates among U.S. Department of Defense health care beneficiaries in military and civilian hospitals worldwide, 1999-2002.
    Linton A; Peterson MR
    Birth; 2004 Dec; 31(4):254-64. PubMed ID: 15566337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cesarean delivery in Native American women: are low rates explained by practices common to the Indian health service?
    Mahoney SF; Malcoe LH
    Birth; 2005 Sep; 32(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 16128970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Maternal and neonatal morbidity after elective repeat Cesarean delivery versus a trial of labor after previous Cesarean delivery in a community teaching hospital.
    Loebel G; Zelop CM; Egan JF; Wax J
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 Apr; 15(4):243-6. PubMed ID: 15280132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk adjusting cesarean delivery rates: a comparison of hospital profiles based on medical record and birth certificate data.
    DiGiuseppe DL; Aron DC; Payne SM; Snow RJ; Dierker L; Rosenthal GE
    Health Serv Res; 2001 Oct; 36(5):959-77. PubMed ID: 11666112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Increased risk of cesarean delivery with advancing maternal age: indications and associated factors in nulliparous women.
    Ecker JL; Chen KT; Cohen AP; Riley LE; Lieberman ES
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):883-7. PubMed ID: 11641671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differences between hospitals in cesarean rates for term primigravidas with cephalic presentation.
    Fischer A; LaCoursiere DY; Barnard P; Bloebaum L; Varner M
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):816-21. PubMed ID: 15802411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors relevant to mode of preterm delivery with syndrome of HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets).
    Magann EF; Roberts WE; Perry KG; Chauhan SP; Blake PG; Martin JN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jun; 170(6):1828-32; discussion 1832-4. PubMed ID: 8203445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictors of repeat cesarean delivery after trial of labor: do any exist?
    Learman LA; Evertson LR; Shiboski S
    J Am Coll Surg; 1996 Mar; 182(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 8603247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cesarean delivery rates and neonatal morbidity in a low-risk population.
    Gould JB; Danielsen B; Korst LM; Phibbs R; Chance K; Main E; Wirtschafter DD; Stevenson DK
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 104(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 15228995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differences in institutional cesarean delivery rates-the role of pain management.
    Janssen PA; Klein MC; Soolsma JH
    J Fam Pract; 2001 Mar; 50(3):217-23. PubMed ID: 11252209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of labour induction on rates of stillbirth and cesarean section in post-term pregnancies.
    Sue-A-Quan AK; Hannah ME; Cohen MM; Foster GA; Liston RM
    CMAJ; 1999 Apr; 160(8):1145-9. PubMed ID: 10234344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Temporal trends in the rates of trial of labor in low-risk pregnancies and their impact on the rates and success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.
    Yeh J; Wactawski-Wende J; Shelton JA; Reschke J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jan; 194(1):144. PubMed ID: 16389024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
    Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
    Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Are the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality obstetric trauma indicators valid measures of hospital safety?
    Grobman WA; Feinglass J; Murthy S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 195(3):868-74. PubMed ID: 16949428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Population-based standardization (PBS) of institutional cesarean delivery rates.
    Grünebaum A; Chervenak F; Skupski D
    J Perinat Med; 2008; 36(2):110-4. PubMed ID: 18211257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of decreasing cesarean births on maternal age-, parity- and ethnicity-associated cesarean rates.
    Poma PA
    J Reprod Med; 2000 Mar; 45(3):213-8. PubMed ID: 10756499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.