119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11084566)
1. Predicting cesarean delivery with decision tree models.
Sims CJ; Meyn L; Caruana R; Rao RB; Mitchell T; Krohn M
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Nov; 183(5):1198-206. PubMed ID: 11084566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Antepartum and intrapartum prediction of cesarean need: risk scoring in singleton pregnancies.
Hin LY; Lau TK; Rogers M; Chang AM
Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Aug; 90(2):183-6. PubMed ID: 9241289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transvaginal ultrasound measurement of cervical length in the supine and upright positions versus Bishop score in predicting successful induction of labor at term.
Meijer-Hoogeveen M; Roos C; Arabin B; Stoutenbeek P; Visser GH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 33(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 19173229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical and ultrasound parameters to predict the risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor.
Peregrine E; O'Brien P; Omar R; Jauniaux E
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Feb; 107(2 Pt 1):227-33. PubMed ID: 16449105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development and validation of a nomogram to predict the risk of cesarean delivery in macrosomia.
Mazouni C; Rouzier R; Collette E; Menard JP; Magnin G; Gamerre M; Deter R
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(5):518-23. PubMed ID: 18446534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cesarean delivery after elective induction in nulliparous women: the physician effect.
Luthy DA; Malmgren JA; Zingheim RW
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Nov; 191(5):1511-5. PubMed ID: 15547518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combined logistic and Bayesian modeling of cesarean section risk.
Smith GC; Dellens M; White IR; Pell JP
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Dec; 191(6):2029-34. PubMed ID: 15592287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using classification trees to assess low birth weight outcomes.
Kitsantas P; Hollander M; Li L
Artif Intell Med; 2006 Nov; 38(3):275-89. PubMed ID: 16730961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of a cesarean delivery risk score.
Hueston WJ
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Dec; 84(6):965-8. PubMed ID: 7970478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women.
Vrouenraets FP; Roumen FJ; Dehing CJ; van den Akker ES; Aarts MJ; Scheve EJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):690-7. PubMed ID: 15802392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of regression trees, logistic regression, generalized additive models, and multivariate adaptive regression splines for predicting AMI mortality.
Austin PC
Stat Med; 2007 Jul; 26(15):2937-57. PubMed ID: 17186501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Emergency cesarean delivery in induction of labor: an evaluation of risk factors.
Cnattingius R; Höglund B; Kieler H
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 May; 84(5):456-62. PubMed ID: 15842210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Infertility treatment is an independent risk factor for cesarean section among nulliparous women aged 40 and above.
Sheiner E; Shoham-Vardi I; Hershkovitz R; Katz M; Mazor M
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):888-92. PubMed ID: 11641672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prediction of risk for cesarean delivery in term nulliparas: a comparison of neural network and multiple logistic regression models.
Al Housseini A; Newman T; Cox A; Devoe LD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jul; 201(1):113.e1-6. PubMed ID: 19576377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A nomogram is more accurate than a regression tree in predicting lymph node invasion in prostate cancer.
Briganti A; Gallina A; Suardi N; Chun FK; Walz J; Heuer R; Salonia A; Haese A; Perrotte P; Valiquette L; Graefen M; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Huland H; Karakiewicz PI
BJU Int; 2008 Mar; 101(5):556-60. PubMed ID: 18005204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Survival advantage associated with cesarean delivery in very low birth weight vertex neonates.
Lee HC; Gould JB
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jan; 107(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 16394046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Delayed parenthood and the risk of cesarean delivery--is paternal age an independent risk factor?
Tang CH; Wu MP; Liu JT; Lin HC; Hsu CC
Birth; 2006 Mar; 33(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 16499528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predicting failure of a vaginal birth attempt after cesarean delivery.
Srinivas SK; Stamilio DM; Stevens EJ; Odibo AO; Peipert JF; Macones GA
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Apr; 109(4):800-5. PubMed ID: 17400839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cesarean delivery in Native American women: are low rates explained by practices common to the Indian health service?
Mahoney SF; Malcoe LH
Birth; 2005 Sep; 32(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 16128970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
