60 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11084749)
21. Biomechanical evaluation of a dynamic pedicle screw fixation device.
Xu HZ; Wang XY; Chi YL; Zhu QA; Lin Y; Huang QS; Dai LY
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 May; 21(4):330-6. PubMed ID: 16434133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System after complete laminectomy-facetectomy on the biomechanics of implanted and adjacent segments.
Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Renner SM; Rosler DM; Ochoa JA; Patwardhan AG
Spine J; 2009; 9(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 18440280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Stiffness of prosthetic nucleus determines stiffness of reconstructed lumbar calf disc.
Buttermann GR; Beaubien BP
Spine J; 2004; 4(3):265-74. PubMed ID: 15125847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Changes in the lumbar foramen following anterior interbody fusion with tapered or cylindrical cages.
Wang M; Dalal S; Bagaria VB; McGrady LM; Rao RD
Spine J; 2007; 7(5):563-9. PubMed ID: 17905318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of uncovertebral joint excision on the motion response of the cervical spine after total disc replacement.
Snyder JT; Tzermiadianos MN; Ghanayem AJ; Voronov LI; Rinella A; Dooris A; Carandang G; Renner SM; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(26):2965-9. PubMed ID: 18091488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Biomechanical evaluation of an interspinous stabilizing device, Locker.
Shim CS; Park SW; Lee SH; Lim TJ; Chun K; Kim DH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Oct; 33(22):E820-7. PubMed ID: 18923305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Prospective, randomized trial of metal-on-metal artificial lumbar disc replacement: initial results for treatment of discogenic pain.
Sasso RC; Foulk DM; Hahn M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 18197095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Effect of artificial disk nucleus implant on mobility and intervertebral disk high of an L4/5 segment after nucleotomy].
Wilke HJ; Kavanagh S; Neller S; Claes L
Orthopade; 2002 May; 31(5):434-40. PubMed ID: 12089792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Biomechanics of two-level Charité artificial disc placement in comparison to fusion plus single-level disc placement combination.
Grauer JN; Biyani A; Faizan A; Kiapour A; Sairyo K; Ivanov A; Ebraheim NA; Patel TCh; Goel VK
Spine J; 2006; 6(6):659-66. PubMed ID: 17088196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. How does spinal canal decompression and dorsal stabilization affect segmental mobility? A biomechanical study.
Delank KS; Gercek E; Kuhn S; Hartmann F; Hely H; Röllinghoff M; Rothschild MA; Stützer H; Sobottke R; Eysel P
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2010 Feb; 130(2):285-92. PubMed ID: 19936771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Relaxation of forces needed to distract cervical vertebrae after discectomy: a biomechanical study.
Aryan HE; Newman CB; Lu DC; Hu SS; Tay BK; Bradford DS; Puttlitz CM; Ames CP
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Apr; 22(2):100-4. PubMed ID: 19342931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. In vitro study of biomechanical behavior of anterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody instrumentation techniques.
Niemeyer TK; Koriller M; Claes L; Kettler A; Werner K; Wilke HJ
Neurosurgery; 2006 Dec; 59(6):1271-6; discussion 1276-7. PubMed ID: 17277690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Multidirectional testing of one- and two-level ProDisc-L versus simulated fusions.
Panjabi M; Henderson G; Abjornson C; Yue J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(12):1311-9. PubMed ID: 17515820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Experimental studies of change in the center of rotation of the moveable segment after intervertebral disk removal].
Steffen R; Wittenberg RH; Nolte LP; Hedtmann A; Kolditz D; Herchenbach T
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1991; 129(3):248-54. PubMed ID: 1833911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level Maverick disc replacement with a hybrid one-level disc replacement and one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Erkan S; Rivera Y; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Transfeldt EE
Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):830-5. PubMed ID: 19477692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effects of slip severity and loading directions on the stability of isthmic spondylolisthesis: a finite element model study.
Natarajan RN; Garretson RB; Biyani A; Lim TH; Andersson GB; An HS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jun; 28(11):1103-12. PubMed ID: 12782976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Biomechanical characteristics of different regions of the human spine: an in vitro study on multilevel spinal segments.
Busscher I; van Dieën JH; Kingma I; van der Veen AJ; Verkerke GJ; Veldhuizen AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Dec; 34(26):2858-64. PubMed ID: 20010393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Types of spinal instability that require interbody support in posterior lumbar reconstruction: an in vitro biomechanical investigation.
Oda I; Abumi K; Yu BS; Sudo H; Minami A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul; 28(14):1573-80. PubMed ID: 12865847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Biomechanical evaluation of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System: 3-dimensional kinematics.
Zhu Q; Larson CR; Sjovold SG; Rosler DM; Keynan O; Wilson DR; Cripton PA; Oxland TR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jan; 32(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 17202893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Junction kinematics between proximal mobile and distal fused lumbar segments: biomechanical analysis of pedicle and hook constructs.
Hongo M; Gay RE; Zhao KD; Ilharreborde B; Huddleston PM; Berglund LJ; An KN; Zhao C
Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):846-53. PubMed ID: 19660990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
