These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

408 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11084752)

  • 1. [Contribution to the differentiation of cross-reacting antibodies in brucellosis serology--1. Reactions with various Yersinia serotypes and antibody avidity].
    Staak C; Draeger A; Bahn P; Nöckler K
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2000 Oct; 113(10):361-7. PubMed ID: 11084752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Serological discrimination by indirect enzyme immunoassay between the antibody response to Brucella sp. and Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 in cattle and pigs.
    Nielsen K; Smith P; Yu W; Nicoletti P; Jungersen G; Stack J; Godfroid J
    Vet Immunol Immunopathol; 2006 Jan; 109(1-2):69-78. PubMed ID: 16140390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The background of the serological cross-reaction between Yersinia and Brucella and the possibility of differential diagnostics by the ELISA technique and the electroimmuno assay (rocket electrophoresis) (author's transl)].
    Hurvell B
    Nord Vet Med; 1978; 30(7-8):305-17. PubMed ID: 693273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Serological relationship between cattle exposed to Brucella abortus, Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 and Escherichia coli O157:H7.
    Nielsen K; Smith P; Widdison J; Gall D; Kelly L; Kelly W; Nicoletti P
    Vet Microbiol; 2004 May; 100(1-2):25-30. PubMed ID: 15135510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cell-mediated immune responses differentiate infections with Brucella suis from Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:9 in pigs.
    Riber U; Jungersen G
    Vet Immunol Immunopathol; 2007 Mar; 116(1-2):13-25. PubMed ID: 17270281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A simple technique to differentiate between animals infected with Yersinia enterocolitica IX and those infected with Brucella abortus.
    Mittal KR; Tizard IR
    Res Vet Sci; 1979 Mar; 26(2):248-50. PubMed ID: 122268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Serological cross-reactions between Brucella abortus and Yersinia enterocolitica 0:9.
    Mittal KR; Tizard IR; Barnum DA
    Int J Zoonoses; 1985 Sep; 12(3):219-27. PubMed ID: 2422134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Advances on the problems of serological cross reactivity between Brucellae and Y enterocolitica 0:9 and the identification of brucellosis and yersinosis].
    Wang WD
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 1985 Jun; 6(3):176-8. PubMed ID: 3896515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Incidence of antibodies against Yersinia enterocolitica in swine sera in relation to the serological differentiation of Brucella infections].
    Schmittdiel E; von Wangenheim B; Chorherr S
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1985 Jan; 98(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 3985937
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of a western blotting assay to discriminate Brucella spp. and Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 infections in sheep.
    Corrente M; Desario C; Greco G; Buonavoglia D; Pratelli A; Madio A; Scaltrito D; Consenti B; Buonavoglia C
    New Microbiol; 2004 Apr; 27(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 15164626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Observations on serological cross-reactions between smooth Brucella species and organisms of other genera.
    Corbel MJ; Stuart FA; Brewer RA
    Dev Biol Stand; 1984; 56():341-8. PubMed ID: 6489620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Salmonella enterica Serotype Urbana Interference with Brucellosis Serology.
    Nielsen K; Smith P; Yu WL; Halbert G
    J Immunoassay Immunochem; 2007; 28(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 17613674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Serological crossreactivity between Brucella abortus and Yersinia enterocolitica 0:9 II the use of Yersinia outer proteins for the specific detection of Yersinia enterocolitica infections in ruminants.
    Kittelberger R; Hilbink F; Hansen MF; Ross GP; Joyce MA; Fenwick S; Heesemann J; Wolf-Watz H; Nielsen K
    Vet Microbiol; 1995 Dec; 47(3-4):271-80. PubMed ID: 8748542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Non specific serological reactions in the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis: experimental oral infection of cattle with repeated doses of Yersinia enterocolitica O:9.
    Garin-Bastuji B; Hummel N; Gerbier G; Cau C; Pouillot R; Da Costa M; Fontaine JJ
    Vet Microbiol; 1999 Apr; 66(3):223-33. PubMed ID: 10227124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The antigenic relationship between Brucella abortus, Brucella melitensis and Yersinia enterocolitica serotype 0:3 and 0:9].
    Kocabeyoğlu O
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 1990 Jul; 24(3):218-25. PubMed ID: 1704479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to differentiate the antibody responses of animals infected with Brucella species from those of animals infected with Yersinia enterocolitica O9.
    Erdenebaatar J; Bayarsaikhan B; Watarai M; Makino S; Shirahata T
    Clin Diagn Lab Immunol; 2003 Jul; 10(4):710-4. PubMed ID: 12853409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Studies on the relationship between Yersinia enterocolitica IX and Brucella abortus agglutinins in naturally infected animals.
    Mittal KR; Tizard IR
    Res Vet Sci; 1980 May; 28(3):311-4. PubMed ID: 6774395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Seroprevalence of brucellosis, tularemia, and yersiniosis in wild boars (Sus scrofa) from north-eastern Germany.
    Al Dahouk S; Nöckler K; Tomaso H; Splettstoesser WD; Jungersen G; Riber U; Petry T; Hoffmann D; Scholz HC; Hensel A; Neubauer H
    J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health; 2005 Dec; 52(10):444-55. PubMed ID: 16364020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Serological cross-reactivity between Brucella abortus and yersinia enterocolitica 0:9: IV. Evaluation of the M- and C-epitope antibody response for the specific detection of B. abortus infections.
    Kittelberger R; Bundesen PG; Cloeckaert A; Greiser-Wilke I; Letesson JJ
    Vet Microbiol; 1998 Feb; 60(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 9595626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efficacy of several serological tests and antigens for diagnosis of bovine brucellosis in the presence of false-positive serological results due to Yersinia enterocolitica O:9.
    Muñoz PM; Marín CM; Monreal D; González D; Garin-Bastuji B; Díaz R; Mainar-Jaime RC; Moriyón I; Blasco JM
    Clin Diagn Lab Immunol; 2005 Jan; 12(1):141-51. PubMed ID: 15642999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.