239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11086149)
1. Circumplex models for the similarity relationships between higher-order factors of personality and personality disorders: an empirical analysis.
Pukrop R; Sass H; Steinmeyer EM
Compr Psychiatry; 2000; 41(6):438-45. PubMed ID: 11086149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The MCMI-III personality disorders scores predicted by the NEO-FFI-R and the ZKPQ-50-CC: a comparative study.
Aluja A; García LF; Cuevas L; García O
J Pers Disord; 2007 Feb; 21(1):58-71. PubMed ID: 17373890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The structure of axis II disorders in adolescents: a cluster- and factor-analytic investigation of DSM-IV categories and criteria.
Durrett C; Westen D
J Pers Disord; 2005 Aug; 19(4):440-61. PubMed ID: 16178684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Circumplex structure of the Impact Message Inventory (IMI-C): an empirical test with the dutch version.
Hafkenscheid A; Rouckhout D
J Pers Assess; 2009 Mar; 91(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 19205939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The validity of Cloninger's psychobiological model versus the five-factor model to predict DSM-IV personality disorders in a heterogeneous psychiatric sample: domain facet and residualized facet descriptions.
De Fruyt F; De Clercq BJ; van de Wiele L; Van Heeringen K
J Pers; 2006 Apr; 74(2):479-510. PubMed ID: 16529584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Danish DAPP-BQ: reliability, factor structure, and convergence with SCID-II and IIP-C.
Simonsen S; Simonsen E
J Pers Disord; 2009 Dec; 23(6):629-46. PubMed ID: 20001179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A five-factor model perspective on psychopathy and comorbid Axis-II disorders in a forensic-psychiatric sample.
Decuyper M; De Fruyt F; Buschman J
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(5):394-406. PubMed ID: 18790537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The representation of four personality disorders by the schedule for nonadaptive and adaptive personality dimensional model of personality.
Morey LC; Warner MB; Shea MT; Gunderson JG; Sanislow CA; Grilo C; Skodol AE; McGlashan TH
Psychol Assess; 2003 Sep; 15(3):326-32. PubMed ID: 14593832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dimensional personality traits and the prediction of DSM-IV personality disorder symptom counts in a nonclinical sample.
Bagby RM; Marshall MB; Georgiades S
J Pers Disord; 2005 Feb; 19(1):53-67. PubMed ID: 15899720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Circumplex scales of interpersonal values: reliability, validity, and applicability to interpersonal problems and personality disorders.
Locke KD
J Pers Assess; 2000 Oct; 75(2):249-67. PubMed ID: 11020143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Millon's dimensional model of personality disorders: a comparative study.
Mullins-Sweatt SN; Widiger TA
J Pers Disord; 2007 Feb; 21(1):42-57. PubMed ID: 17373889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Personality and personality disorders I. Universality and sensitivity of dimensional personality models as diagnostic systems for personality disorders].
Steinmeyer EM; Klosterkötter J; Möller HJ; Sass H; Herpertz S; Czernik A; Marcea JT; Matakas F; Mehne J; Bottländer H; Hesse W; Steinbring I; Pukrop R
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr; 2002 Dec; 70(12):630-40. PubMed ID: 12459944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The big seven model of personality and its relevance to personality pathology.
Simms LJ
J Pers; 2007 Feb; 75(1):65-94. PubMed ID: 17214592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Personality and personality disorders II. The Specificity of the DAPP-model as a diagnostic system for personality disorders].
Steinmeyer EM; Klosterkötter J; Möller HJ; Sass H; Herpertz S; Czernik A; Marcea JT; Matakas F; Mehne J; Bottländer H; Hesse W; Steinbring I; Pukrop R
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr; 2002 Dec; 70(12):641-6. PubMed ID: 12459945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An evaluation of evaluative personality terms: a comparison of the big seven and five-factor model in predicting psychopathology.
Durrett C; Trull TJ
Psychol Assess; 2005 Sep; 17(3):359-68. PubMed ID: 16262461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Empirical evidence for a four factor framework of personality disorder organization: multigroup confirmatory factor analysis of the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III personality disorder scales across Belgian and Danish data samples.
Rossi G; Elklit A; Simonsen E
J Pers Disord; 2010 Feb; 24(1):128-50. PubMed ID: 20205502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Conceptions of perfectionism and interpersonal problems: evaluating groups using the structural summary method for circumplex data.
Slaney RB; Pincus AL; Uliaszek AA; Wang KT
Assessment; 2006 Jun; 13(2):138-53. PubMed ID: 16672729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validity of the PAI interpersonal scales for measuring the dimensions of the interpersonal circumplex.
Ansell EB; Kurtz JE; DeMoor RM; Markey PM
J Pers Assess; 2011 Jan; 93(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 21184328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospects for the assessment of normal and abnormal interpersonal behavior.
Wiggins JS; Trobst KK
J Pers Assess; 1997 Feb; 68(1):110-26. PubMed ID: 9018846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Unifying the aspects of the Big Five, the interpersonal circumplex, and trait affiliation.
DeYoung CG; Weisberg YJ; Quilty LC; Peterson JB
J Pers; 2013 Oct; 81(5):465-75. PubMed ID: 23126539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
