These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11088273)

  • 21. Modeling defibrillation: effects of fiber curvature.
    Trayanova N; Skouibine K
    J Electrocardiol; 1998; 31 Suppl():23-9. PubMed ID: 9988001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Increasing the computational efficiency of a bidomain model of defibrillation using a time-dependent activating function.
    Skouibine K; Krassowska W
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2000 Jul; 28(7):772-80. PubMed ID: 11016414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Utility of low energy test shocks for estimation of cardiac and electrode impedance with implantable defibrillators.
    Leitch JW; Yee R; Klein GJ; Jones DL
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Apr; 13(4):410-6. PubMed ID: 1692124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Spiral waves in two-dimensional models of ventricular muscle: formation of a stationary core.
    Beaumont J; Davidenko N; Davidenko JM; Jalife J
    Biophys J; 1998 Jul; 75(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 9649363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Timing of defibrillation shocks for resuscitation of rapid ventricular tachycardia: does it make a difference?
    Turner I; Turner S; Grace AA
    Resuscitation; 2009 Feb; 80(2):183-8. PubMed ID: 19091453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prediction of successful defibrillation in human victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a retrospective electrocardiographic analysis.
    Ristagno G; Gullo A; Berlot G; Lucangelo U; Geheb E; Bisera J
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2008 Jan; 36(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 18326131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Spectrum of issues detected by an ICD diagnostic alert that utilizes far-field electrograms: Clinical implications.
    Koneru JN; Kaszala K; Bordachar P; Shehata M; Swerdlow C; Ellenbogen KA
    Heart Rhythm; 2015 May; 12(5):957-67. PubMed ID: 25640632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Apical versus Non-Apical Lead: Is ICD Lead Position Important for Successful Defibrillation?
    Amit G; Wang J; Connolly SJ; Glikson M; Hohnloser S; Wright DJ; Brachmann J; Defaye P; Neuzner J; Mabo P; Vanerven L; Vinolas X; O'Hara G; Kautzner J; Appl U; Gadler F; Stein K; Konstantino Y; Healey JS
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2016 May; 27(5):581-6. PubMed ID: 26888558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cardiac damage produced by transchest damped sine wave shocks.
    Tacker WA; Davis JS; Lie JT; Titus JL; Geddes LA
    Med Instrum; 1978; 12(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 634186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Vortex cordis as a mechanism of postshock activation: arrhythmia induction study using a bidomain model.
    Ashihara T; Namba T; Yao T; Ozawa T; Kawase A; Ikeda T; Nakazawa K; Ito M
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2003 Mar; 14(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 12716113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Defibrillation electrode configurations developed from cardiac mapping that combine biphasic shocks with sequential timing.
    Guse PA; Walcott GP; Rollins DL; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Am Heart J; 1992 Dec; 124(6):1491-500. PubMed ID: 1462904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Multicenter comparison of truncated biphasic shocks and standard damped sine wave monophasic shocks for transthoracic ventricular defibrillation. Transthoracic Investigators.
    Bardy GH; Marchlinski FE; Sharma AD; Worley SJ; Luceri RM; Yee R; Halperin BD; Fellows CL; Ahern TS; Chilson DA; Packer DL; Wilber DJ; Mattioni TA; Reddy R; Kronmal RA; Lazzara R
    Circulation; 1996 Nov; 94(10):2507-14. PubMed ID: 8921795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effects of biphasic and conventional monophasic defibrillation on postresuscitation myocardial function.
    Tang W; Weil MH; Sun S; Yamaguchi H; Povoas HP; Pernat AM; Bisera J
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1999 Sep; 34(3):815-22. PubMed ID: 10483965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Approximate solution to the bidomain equations for defibrillation problems.
    Patel SG; Roth BJ
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2005 Feb; 71(2 Pt 1):021908. PubMed ID: 15783353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of a novel rectilinear biphasic waveform with a damped sine wave monophasic waveform for transthoracic ventricular defibrillation. ZOLL Investigators.
    Mittal S; Ayati S; Stein KM; Knight BP; Morady F; Schwartzman D; Cavlovich D; Platia EV; Calkins H; Tchou PJ; Miller JM; Wharton JM; Sung RJ; Slotwiner DJ; Markowitz SM; Lerman BB
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1999 Nov; 34(5):1595-601. PubMed ID: 10551711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Delayed success in termination of three-dimensional reentry: role of surface polarization.
    Zemlin C; Mironov S; Pertsov A
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2003 Oct; 14(10 Suppl):S257-63. PubMed ID: 14760931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Minimal interruption of cardiopulmonary resuscitation for a single shock as mandated by automated external defibrillations does not compromise outcomes in a porcine model of cardiac arrest and resuscitation.
    Ristagno G; Tang W; Russell JK; Jorgenson D; Wang H; Sun S; Weil MH
    Crit Care Med; 2008 Nov; 36(11):3048-53. PubMed ID: 18824916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Shock-induced termination of reentrant cardiac arrhythmias: comparing monophasic and biphasic shock protocols.
    Bragard J; Simic A; Elorza J; Grigoriev RO; Cherry EM; Gilmour RF; Otani NF; Fenton FH
    Chaos; 2013 Dec; 23(4):043119. PubMed ID: 24387558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A space-time adaptive method for simulating complex cardiac dynamics.
    Cherry EM; Greenside HS; Henriquez CS
    Phys Rev Lett; 2000 Feb; 84(6):1343-6. PubMed ID: 11017514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Timing of the upper limit of vulnerability is different for monophasic and biphasic shocks: implications for the determination of the defibrillation threshold.
    Behrens S; Li C; Franz MR
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Sep; 20(9 Pt 1):2179-87. PubMed ID: 9309741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.