247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11091230)
1. On the editor's desk.
Farndon JR; Murie JA
Br J Surg; 2000 Nov; 87(11):1444-7. PubMed ID: 11091230
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. An Editor's exit. Editor's-in-Chief of 21 years reflections.
Waring GO
J Refract Surg; 2010 Oct; 26(10):698-702. PubMed ID: 20954681
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Journals submit to scrutiny of their peer-review process.
Giles J
Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7074):252. PubMed ID: 16421533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. From the editor's desk.
Taneja PN
Indian Pediatr; 1971 Jan; 8(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 5567105
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. How to avoid the reviewer's axe: one editor's view.
Senturia SD
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2004 Jan; 51(1):127-30. PubMed ID: 14995024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Developing effective editorial boards for hospital-based newsletters and magazines.
Jones S
Nurse Author Ed; 1994; 4(3):2-4, 7. PubMed ID: 7849789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three cheers for peers.
Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7073):118. PubMed ID: 16407911
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Guide for peer reviewers of scientific articles in the Croatian Medical Journal.
Marusić M; Sambunjak D; Marusić A
Croat Med J; 2005 Apr; 46(2):326-32. PubMed ID: 15849858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Time goes by: looking back at 20 years behind the editor's desk.
Neumann ME
Nephrol News Issues; 2009 Oct; 23(11):8. PubMed ID: 19911505
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. What is submitted and what gets accepted in Indian Pediatrics: analysis of submissions, review process, decision making, and criteria for rejection.
Gupta P; Kaur G; Sharma B; Shah D; Choudhury P
Indian Pediatr; 2006 Jun; 43(6):479-89. PubMed ID: 16820657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The editor's editors.
Morse JM
Qual Health Res; 2008 Aug; 18(8):1019-20. PubMed ID: 18650558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Editor's report.
Elliott A
Nucl Med Commun; 2008 Jan; 29(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 18049090
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. An editor's checklist.
Guillery RW
Science; 2008 Aug; 321(5892):1039. PubMed ID: 18719263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Editor's Note: PubMed inclusion and recognizing top reviewers.
Lee WR
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2014; 4(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 24621415
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Appealing the Editor's Decision: When and How.
Chyun DA; Sullivan MC; Vessey JA; Henly SJ
Nurs Res; 2017; 66(1):1. PubMed ID: 27977562
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Editor's quinquennial report 2008.
Rew D
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2008 May; 34(5):485-6. PubMed ID: 18406101
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Psychoanalytic facts: from the editor's desk.
Shapiro T
Int J Psychoanal; 1994 Dec; 75 ( Pt 5-6)():1225-32. PubMed ID: 7713657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. JPGM 2007-12: the editor's report.
Bavdekar SB
J Postgrad Med; 2012; 58(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 22718051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [The impact factor and editorial decisions].
Matías-Guiu J; García-Ramos R
Neurologia; 2008; 23(6):342-8. PubMed ID: 18597189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Section Editor's Notebook: Impact Factor--An Analog Metric in a Digital World.
Javitt MC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Dec; 205(6):1153-4. PubMed ID: 26587918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]