These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11091230)

  • 41. [Tidsskriftet, peer review and medical publishing].
    Bjørheim J; Frich JC; Gjersvik P; Jacobsen G; Swensen E
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Jan; 126(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 16397649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Decisions.
    Rosenfeld RM
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Aug; 139(2):179-80. PubMed ID: 18656711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Congenital malformation case reports: the editor's and reviewer's dilemma.
    Brent RL
    Am J Med Genet; 1993 Nov; 47(6):872-4. PubMed ID: 8279485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. CONSORT and beyond.
    Blackstone EH
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Aug; 132(2):229-32. PubMed ID: 16872939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Publication and peer recognition.
    Mireylees B
    J Audiov Media Med; 2003 Dec; 26(4):161. PubMed ID: 14718200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Scientific publishing. Peer review and quality: a dubious connection?
    Enserink M
    Science; 2001 Sep; 293(5538):2187-8. PubMed ID: 11567115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Changing scientific publishing.
    Raff MC; Stevens CF; Roberts K; Shatz CJ; Roberts K; Shatz CJ; Newsome WT
    Science; 2004 Aug; 305(5686):945-6. PubMed ID: 15310878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. International Journal of Legal Medicine's manuscript submission and peer-review system goes electronic!
    Brinkmann B; Pfeiffer H
    Int J Legal Med; 2009 May; 123(3):187. PubMed ID: 19347347
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Evaluating the surgery literature: can standardizing peer-review today predict manuscript impact tomorrow?
    Sosa JA; Mehta P; Thomas DC; Berland G; Gross C; McNamara RL; Rosenthal R; Udelsman R; Bravata DM; Roman SA
    Ann Surg; 2009 Jul; 250(1):152-8. PubMed ID: 19561471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Journals: how to decide what's worth publishing.
    Jefferson T; Shashok K
    Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6920):209-10. PubMed ID: 12529609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Electronic manuscripts: the periodicals earn money, the referees pay].
    Kelly KB
    Lakartidningen; 2005 Mar 14-20; 102(11):888. PubMed ID: 15835532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Peer review of guidelines, best practice statements and new documents: what this means for how we use them.
    Droller MJ
    J Urol; 2008 Dec; 180(6):2297-8. PubMed ID: 18930290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Publishing in peer review journals--criteria for success.
    McIntyre E; Eckermann SL; Keane M; Magarey A; Roeger L
    Aust Fam Physician; 2007 Jul; 36(7):561-2. PubMed ID: 17619676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Publication in peer-reviewed medical journals.
    Igić R
    J BUON; 2006; 11(4):405-10. PubMed ID: 17309169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The Neuroscience Peer Review Consortium.
    Saper CB; Maunsell JH
    Neuroinformatics; 2009 Jun; 7(2):89-91. PubMed ID: 19172416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A perspective on scientific peer review for informing regulatory decisions: making sure peer review makes a difference.
    Greenbaum D
    Risk Anal; 2006 Feb; 26(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 16492174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Open access in medical publishing: trends and countertrends.
    CMAJ; 2005 Jan; 172(2):149, 151. PubMed ID: 15655217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Success at publishing in biomedical journals: hints from a journal editor.
    Brumback RA
    J Child Neurol; 2009 Mar; 24(3):370-8. PubMed ID: 19258300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Structure and format of peer-reviewed scientific manuscripts.
    Manske PR
    J Hand Surg Am; 2006 Sep; 31(7):1051-5. PubMed ID: 16945702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Editor's note: plagiarism.
    Alvares O
    J Dent Educ; 2008 Oct; 72(10):1099. PubMed ID: 18923088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.