126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11091528)
1. A Comparison of Mass Screening for Breast Cancer Using Mammography and Physical Examination Alone in Japan.
Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Harada K; Sagara Y
Breast Cancer; 1995 Apr; 2(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 11091528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Early detection of breast cancer by mass screening using mammography].
Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Harada K; Kondo H; Kuroda R
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1994 Jun; 21 Suppl 2():158-63. PubMed ID: 8037479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High detection rate of breast cancer by mass screening using mammography in Japan.
Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Harada K; Sagara Y
Jpn J Cancer Res; 1994 Dec; 85(12):1193-5. PubMed ID: 7852181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan.
Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Akaiwa H; Sagara Y
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improved detection rate of early breast cancer in mass screening combined with mammography.
Ohuchi N; Yoshida K; Kimura M; Ouchi A; Kamioki S; Shiiba K; Matoba N; Kojima S; Takahashi K; Matsuno S
Jpn J Cancer Res; 1993 Jul; 84(7):807-12. PubMed ID: 8396569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Mass screening for breast cancer--the results for 15 years].
Ueda N; Nakano Y; Fujita M; Fujiwara A; Horino T; Usugane M; Ota J; Kumanishi Y; Tsukahara Y; Kimoto Y
Gan No Rinsho; 1985 Nov; 31(14):1781-6. PubMed ID: 4087383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relative and combined performance of mammography and ultrasonography for breast cancer screening in the general population: a pilot study in Tochigi Prefecture, Japan.
Honjo S; Ando J; Tsukioka T; Morikubo H; Ichimura M; Sunagawa M; Hasegawa T; Watanabe T; Kodama T; Tominaga K; Sasagawa M; Koyama Y
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2007 Sep; 37(9):715-20. PubMed ID: 17766996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effectiveness of mammographic screening for breast cancer in women aged over 50 years in Japan.
Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Sagara Y; Kuwamura Y; Yamamoto S; Tada T
Jpn J Cancer Res; 1997 Aug; 88(8):778-84. PubMed ID: 9330610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Canadian National Breast Screening Study-2: 13-year results of a randomized trial in women aged 50-59 years.
Miller AB; To T; Baines CJ; Wall C
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2000 Sep; 92(18):1490-9. PubMed ID: 10995804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations.
Kolb TM; Lichy J; Newhouse JH
Radiology; 2002 Oct; 225(1):165-75. PubMed ID: 12355001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Current problems in mass screening for breast cancer].
Morimoto T; Yamakawa T; Mitsuyama N
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1985 Dec; 12(12):2273-83. PubMed ID: 4073925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 2. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 50 to 59 years.
Miller AB; Baines CJ; To T; Wall C
CMAJ; 1992 Nov; 147(10):1477-88. PubMed ID: 1423088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Current Status of Screening for Breast Cancer and Tasks for Introduction of Mammographic Screening in Japan.
Morimoto T; Sasa M
Breast Cancer; 1998 Jul; 5(3):227-234. PubMed ID: 11091653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 1. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 to 49 years.
Miller AB; Baines CJ; To T; Wall C
CMAJ; 1992 Nov; 147(10):1459-76. PubMed ID: 1423087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of digital screening mammography and screen-film mammography in the early detection of clinically relevant cancers: a multicenter study.
Bluekens AM; Holland R; Karssemeijer N; Broeders MJ; den Heeten GJ
Radiology; 2012 Dec; 265(3):707-14. PubMed ID: 23033499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Invasive cancers detected after breast cancer screening yielded a negative result: relationship of mammographic density to tumor prognostic factors.
Roubidoux MA; Bailey JE; Wray LA; Helvie MA
Radiology; 2004 Jan; 230(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 14695385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Earlier detection of breast cancer by surveillance of women at familial risk.
Tilanus-Linthorst MM; Bartels CC; Obdeijn AI; Oudkerk M
Eur J Cancer; 2000 Mar; 36(4):514-9. PubMed ID: 10717529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characteristics of breast cancer in an incident cancer population.
Schmitt EL; Threatt B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Aug; 143(2):403-6. PubMed ID: 6611076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mammography screening: an incremental cost effectiveness analysis of two view versus one view procedures in London.
Bryan S; Brown J; Warren R
J Epidemiol Community Health; 1995 Feb; 49(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 7707010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
