208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11091529)
1. Pathologic Assessment of Surgical Margins on Frozen and Permanent Sections in Breast Conserving Surgery.
Noguchi M; Minami M; Earashi M; Taniya T; Miyazaki I; Mizukami Y; Nonomura A; Nishijima H; Takanaka T; Kawashima H; Saito Y; Takashima C; Nakamura S; Michigishi T; Yokoyama K
Breast Cancer; 1995 Apr; 2(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 11091529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intraoperative histologic assessment of surgical margins and lymph node metastasis in breast-conserving surgery.
Noguchi M; Minami M; Earashi M; Taniya T; Miyazaki I; Mizukami Y; Nonomura A
J Surg Oncol; 1995 Nov; 60(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 7475069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of Intraoperative Imprint Cytology Followed by Frozen Section on Margin Assessment in Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Tamanuki T; Namura M; Aoyagi T; Shimizu S; Suwa T; Matsuzaki H
Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Mar; 28(3):1338-1346. PubMed ID: 32815080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interoperative frozen section for margin assessment in breast conserving energy.
Dener C; Inan A; Sen M; Demirci S
Scand J Surg; 2009; 98(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 19459270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Frozen section analysis for intraoperative margin assessment during breast-conserving surgery results in low rates of re-excision and local recurrence.
Olson TP; Harter J; Muñoz A; Mahvi DM; Breslin T
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2953-60. PubMed ID: 17674109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Usefulness of Intraoperative Circumferential Frozen-Section Analysis of Lumpectomy Margins in Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Ko S; Chun YK; Kang SS; Hur MH
J Breast Cancer; 2017 Jun; 20(2):176-182. PubMed ID: 28690654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of frozen section analysis of margins during breast conservation surgery.
Weber S; Storm FK; Stitt J; Mahvi DM
Cancer J Sci Am; 1997; 3(5):273-7. PubMed ID: 9327150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery.
Cabioglu N; Hunt KK; Sahin AA; Kuerer HM; Babiera GV; Singletary SE; Whitman GJ; Ross MI; Ames FC; Feig BW; Buchholz TA; Meric-Bernstam F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):1458-71. PubMed ID: 17260108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of frozen sections in assessing margins in oral cancer resection.
Ord RA; Aisner S
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1997 Jul; 55(7):663-9; discussion 669-71. PubMed ID: 9216496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of Using Intra-Operative Ultrasound Guided Breast- Conserving Surgery on Positive Margin and Re-Excision Rates in Breast Cancer Cases with Current SSO/ASTRO Guidelines.
Thanasitthichai S; Chaiwerawattana A; Phadhana-Anake O
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(9):4463-4467. PubMed ID: 27797262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Close/positive margins after breast-conserving therapy: additional resection or no resection?
Wood WC
Breast; 2013 Aug; 22 Suppl 2():S115-7. PubMed ID: 24074771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Malignant eyelid tumors: Are intra-operative rapid frozen section and permanent section diagnoses of surgical margins concordant?
Kaliki S; Pyda S; Goel N; Dave TV; Naik MN; Mishra DK
Int Ophthalmol; 2019 Oct; 39(10):2205-2211. PubMed ID: 30535567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Low re-excision rate for positive margins in patients treated with ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery.
Yu CC; Chiang KC; Kuo WL; Shen SC; Lo YF; Chen SC
Breast; 2013 Oct; 22(5):698-702. PubMed ID: 23333255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors that influence the incidence of microscopic carcinoma in frozen and preserved specimens from patients with breast carcinoma after breast-conserving surgery.
Kim R; Osaki A; Kaneko M; Inai K; Toge T
Oncol Rep; 2003; 10(5):1321-8. PubMed ID: 12883701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficacy of intraoperative entire-circumferential frozen section analysis of lumpectomy margins during breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer.
Osako T; Nishimura R; Nishiyama Y; Okumura Y; Tashima R; Nakano M; Fujisue M; Toyozumi Y; Arima N
Int J Clin Oncol; 2015 Dec; 20(6):1093-101. PubMed ID: 25855313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimizing local recurrence after breast conserving therapy using intraoperative shaved margins to determine pathologic tumor clearance.
Camp ER; McAuliffe PF; Gilroy JS; Morris CG; Lind DS; Mendenhall NP; Copeland EM
J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Dec; 201(6):855-61. PubMed ID: 16310688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Utility of intraoperative frozen section examinations of surgical margins: implication of margin-exposed tumor component features on further surgical treatment.
Kikuyama M; Akashi-Tanaka S; Hojo T; Kinoshita T; Ogawa T; Seto Y; Tsuda H
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2015 Jan; 45(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 25320337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is frozen section analysis of reexcision lumpectomy margins worthwhile? Margin analysis in breast reexcisions.
Sauter ER; Hoffman JP; Ottery FD; Kowalyshyn MJ; Litwin S; Eisenberg BL
Cancer; 1994 May; 73(10):2607-12. PubMed ID: 8174059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinicopathologic factors related to surgical margin involvement, reoperation, and residual cancer in primary operable breast cancer - An analysis of 2050 patients.
Lai HW; Huang RH; Wu YT; Chen CJ; Chen ST; Lin YJ; Chen DR; Lee CW; Wu HK; Lin HY; Kuo SJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1725-1735. PubMed ID: 30120037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of frozen section in the intra-operative margin assessment during breast conserving surgery.
Anila KR; Chandramohan K; Mathews A; Somanathan T; Jayasree K
Indian J Cancer; 2016; 53(2):235-238. PubMed ID: 28071617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
