329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11093610)
1. Field trials using a digital hearing aid with active noise reduction and dual-microphone directionality.
Boymans M; Dreschler WA
Audiology; 2000; 39(5):260-8. PubMed ID: 11093610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sentence recognition in noise and perceived benefit of noise reduction on the receiver and transmitter sides of a BICROS hearing aid.
Oeding K; Valente M
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(10):980-91. PubMed ID: 24384083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical evaluation of a full-digital in-the-ear hearing instrument.
Boymans M; Dreschler WA; Schoneveld P; Verschuure H
Audiology; 1999; 38(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 10206519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is normal or less than normal overall loudness preferred by first-time hearing aid users?
Smeds K
Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):159-72. PubMed ID: 15064661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of two digital hearing instrument fitting strategies.
Wesselkamp M; Margolf-Hackl S; Kiessling J
Scand Audiol Suppl; 2001; (52):73-5. PubMed ID: 11318489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of a BICROS System with a Directional Microphone in the Receiver and Transmitter.
Valente M; Oeding K
J Am Acad Audiol; 2015; 26(10):856-71. PubMed ID: 26554490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Personal amplification for school-age children with auditory processing disorders.
Kuk F; Jackson A; Keenan D; Lau CC
J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Jun; 19(6):465-80. PubMed ID: 19253780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differences in Word and Phoneme Recognition in Quiet, Sentence Recognition in Noise, and Subjective Outcomes between Manufacturer First-Fit and Hearing Aids Programmed to NAL-NL2 Using Real-Ear Measures.
Valente M; Oeding K; Brockmeyer A; Smith S; Kallogjeri D
J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Sep; 29(8):706-721. PubMed ID: 30222541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of multichannel digital signal processing on loudness comfort, sentence recognition, and sound quality.
Mispagel KM; Valente M
J Am Acad Audiol; 2006; 17(10):681-707. PubMed ID: 17153718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Speech recognition in noise using bilateral open-fit hearing aids: the limited benefit of directional microphones and noise reduction.
Magnusson L; Claesson A; Persson M; Tengstrand T
Int J Audiol; 2013 Jan; 52(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 22928919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An examination of the practicality of the simplex procedure.
Preminger JE; Neuman AC; Bakke MH; Walters D; Levitt H
Ear Hear; 2000 Jun; 21(3):177-93. PubMed ID: 10890726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The performance of an automatic acoustic-based program classifier compared to hearing aid users' manual selection of listening programs.
Searchfield GD; Linford T; Kobayashi K; Crowhen D; Latzel M
Int J Audiol; 2018 Mar; 57(3):201-212. PubMed ID: 29069954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the NAL(R) and Cambridge formulae for the fitting of linear hearing aids.
Peters RW; Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Stone MA
Br J Audiol; 2000 Feb; 34(1):21-36. PubMed ID: 10759075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sound quality measures for speech in noise through a commercial hearing aid implementing digital noise reduction.
Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 May; 16(5):270-7. PubMed ID: 16119254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adaptive fitting of hearing instruments by category loudness scaling (ScalAdapt).
Kiessling J; Schubert M; Archut A
Scand Audiol; 1996; 25(3):153-60. PubMed ID: 8881002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dynamic relation between working memory capacity and speech recognition in noise during the first 6 months of hearing aid use.
Ng EH; Classon E; Larsby B; Arlinger S; Lunner T; Rudner M; Rönnberg J
Trends Hear; 2014 Nov; 18():. PubMed ID: 25421088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of Adaptive Noise Management Technologies for School-Age Children with Hearing Loss.
Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L
J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 May; 28(5):415-435. PubMed ID: 28534732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Double blind comparison of three hearing aid circuits with new hearing aid users.
Hayes DE; Cormier KL
Scand Audiol; 2000; 29(1):10-9. PubMed ID: 10718672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance benefits for adults using a cochlear implant with adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO): a comparative study.
Müller-Deile J; Kiefer J; Wyss J; Nicolai J; Battmer R
Cochlear Implants Int; 2008 Mar; 9(1):8-26. PubMed ID: 18300224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hearing performance in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users after upgrade to a single-unit speech processor.
Mertens G; Hofkens A; Punte AK; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jan; 36(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 25406874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
