248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11094367)
1. Accuracy of computerized automatic identification of cephalometric landmarks.
Liu JK; Chen YT; Cheng KS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Nov; 118(5):535-40. PubMed ID: 11094367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automatic computerized radiographic identification of cephalometric landmarks.
Rudolph DJ; Sinclair PM; Coggins JM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Feb; 113(2):173-9. PubMed ID: 9484208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of scanned lateral cephalograms with corresponding original radiographs.
Bruntz LQ; Palomo JM; Baden S; Hans MG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Sep; 130(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 16979492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability of computer-generated cephalometrics.
Nimkarn Y; Miles PG
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 9081992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability of landmark identification on monitor-displayed lateral cephalometric images.
Yu SH; Nahm DS; Baek SH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):790.e1-6; discussion e1. PubMed ID: 18538235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cephalometric digitization: A determination of the minimum scanner settings necessary for precise landmark identification.
Held CL; Ferguson DJ; Gallo MW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 May; 119(5):472-81. PubMed ID: 11343018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Landmark identification on direct digital versus film-based cephalometric radiographs: a human skull study.
Schulze RK; Gloede MB; Doll GM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Dec; 122(6):635-42. PubMed ID: 12490875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Landmark identification errors on cone-beam computed tomography-derived cephalograms and conventional digital cephalograms.
Chang ZC; Hu FC; Lai E; Yao CC; Chen MH; Chen YJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Dec; 140(6):e289-97. PubMed ID: 22133963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of cephalometric landmarks on monitor-displayed radiographs with and without image emboss enhancement.
Leonardi RM; Giordano D; Maiorana F; Greco M
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 20022892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automated cephalometry: system performance reliability using landmark-dependent criteria.
Tanikawa C; Yagi M; Takada K
Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1037-46. PubMed ID: 19852592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of speed, repeatability, and reproducibility of digital radiography with manual versus computer-assisted cephalometric analyses.
Uysal T; Baysal A; Yagci A
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):523-8. PubMed ID: 19443692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of differences in landmark identification on the cephalometric measurements in traditional versus digitized cephalometry.
Chen YJ; Chen SK; Yao JC; Chang HF
Angle Orthod; 2004 Apr; 74(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 15132440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of computerized automatic identification of cephalometric landmarks by a designed software.
Shahidi Sh; Oshagh M; Gozin F; Salehi P; Danaei SM
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(1):20110187. PubMed ID: 23236215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of hand-traced and computerized cephalograms: landmark identification, measurement, and superimposition accuracy.
Roden-Johnson D; English J; Gallerano R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):556-64. PubMed ID: 18405820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The accuracy of cephalometric tracing superimposition.
Gliddon MJ; Xia JJ; Gateno J; Wong HT; Lasky RE; Teichgraeber JF; Jia X; Liebschner MA; Lemoine JJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Feb; 64(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 16413890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The study of automatic cephalometric analysis system].
Zhang X; Zhang Z; Zhang X
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Mar; 34(2):76-9. PubMed ID: 11834164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks: an experimental study on skulls.
Hägg U; Cooke MS; Chan TC; Tng TT; Lau PY
Aust Orthod J; 1998 Oct; 15(3):177-85. PubMed ID: 10204427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of cephalometric measurements with digital versus conventional cephalometric analysis.
Celik E; Polat-Ozsoy O; Toygar Memikoglu TU
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 19237509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative cephalometric errors for orthodontic and surgical patients.
Wah PL; Cooke MS; Hägg U
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 9081997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of landmark identification in traditional versus computer-aided digital cephalometry.
Chen YJ; Chen SK; Chang HF; Chen KC
Angle Orthod; 2000 Oct; 70(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 11036999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
