These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11094367)

  • 21. Comparison of landmark identification and linear and angular measurements in conventional and digital cephalometry.
    Akhare PJ; Dagab AM; Alle RS; Shenoyd U; Garla V
    Int J Comput Dent; 2013; 16(3):241-54. PubMed ID: 24364195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Validity and reliability of a new edge-based computerized method for identification of cephalometric landmarks.
    Kazandjian S; Kiliaridis S; Mavropoulos A
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):619-24. PubMed ID: 16808568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Study of automatic cephalometric analysis by digital image processing].
    Maizumi I
    Shigaku; 1989 Oct; 77(3):822-38. PubMed ID: 2489334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Ceph-Net: automatic detection of cephalometric landmarks on scanned lateral cephalograms from children and adolescents using an attention-based stacked regression network.
    Yang S; Song ES; Lee ES; Kang SR; Yi WJ; Lee SP
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Oct; 23(1):803. PubMed ID: 37884918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Are collimated low-dose digital radiographs valid for performing Delaire's architectural analysis?
    Stamm T; Meier N; Hohoff A; Meyer U; Heinecke A; Joos U
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Dec; 32(6):600-5. PubMed ID: 14636609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accuracy of digital and analogue cephalometric measurements assessed with the sandwich technique.
    Santoro M; Jarjoura K; Cangialosi TJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):345-51. PubMed ID: 16527629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Developing an automatic lateral cephalometric landmark identification program and evaluating its performance.
    Rakhshan V; Rakhshan H; Sheibaninia A
    Int J Comput Dent; 2009; 12(4):327-43. PubMed ID: 20108870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluating the accuracy of automated cephalometric analysis based on artificial intelligence.
    Bao H; Zhang K; Yu C; Li H; Cao D; Shu H; Liu L; Yan B
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Apr; 23(1):191. PubMed ID: 37005593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Enhanced speed and precision of measurement in a computer-assisted digital cephalometric analysis system.
    Chen SK; Chen YJ; Yao CC; Chang HF
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Aug; 74(4):501-7. PubMed ID: 15387028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Accuracy of 3D cephalometric measurements based on an automatic knowledge-based landmark detection algorithm.
    Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Sardana V; Balachandran R; Sardana HK
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Jul; 11(7):1297-309. PubMed ID: 26704370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Automatic 3-dimensional cephalometric landmarking based on active shape models in related projections.
    Montúfar J; Romero M; Scougall-Vilchis RJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Mar; 153(3):449-458. PubMed ID: 29501121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Fully Automatic System for Accurate Localisation and Analysis of Cephalometric Landmarks in Lateral Cephalograms.
    Lindner C; Wang CW; Huang CT; Li CH; Chang SW; Cootes TF
    Sci Rep; 2016 Sep; 6():33581. PubMed ID: 27645567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of measurements from photographed lateral cephalograms and scanned cephalograms.
    Collins J; Shah A; McCarthy C; Sandler J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Dec; 132(6):830-3. PubMed ID: 18068604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Random errors in localization of landmarks in postero-anterior cephalograms.
    Athanasiou AE; Miethke R; Van Der Meij AJ
    Br J Orthod; 1999 Dec; 26(4):273-84. PubMed ID: 10592154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Development of a computerized automatic identification system for use in cephalometry].
    Li S; Wu Q; Zhang H
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2002 Nov; 37(6):466-8. PubMed ID: 12641966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessment of 3-dimensional computer-generated cephalometric measurements.
    Kusnoto B; Evans CA; BeGole EA; de Rijk W
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Oct; 116(4):390-9. PubMed ID: 10511666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Automatic localization of cephalometric Landmarks.
    Grau V; Alcañiz M; Juan MC; Monserrat C; Knoll C
    J Biomed Inform; 2001 Jun; 34(3):146-56. PubMed ID: 11723697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of AudaxCeph®'s fully automated cephalometric tracing technology to a semi-automated approach by human examiners.
    Ristau B; Coreil M; Chapple A; Armbruster P; Ballard R
    Int Orthod; 2022 Dec; 20(4):100691. PubMed ID: 36114136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An evaluation of cellular neural networks for the automatic identification of cephalometric landmarks on digital images.
    Leonardi R; Giordano D; Maiorana F
    J Biomed Biotechnol; 2009; 2009():717102. PubMed ID: 19753320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reliability of cranial base measurements on lateral skull radiographs.
    Arponen H; Elf H; Evälahti M; Waltimo-Sirén J
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2008 Nov; 11(4):201-10. PubMed ID: 18950316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.