These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11094367)

  • 41. Reliability and accuracy of three different computerized cephalometric analysis software.
    Rusu O; Petcu AE; Drăgan E; Haba D; Moscalu M; Zetu IN
    Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2015; 119(1):248-56. PubMed ID: 25970975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Software system for calibrating examiners in cephalometric point identification.
    Silveira HL; Silveira HE; Dalla-Bona RR; Abdala DD; Bertoldi RF; von Wangenheim A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Mar; 135(3):400-5. PubMed ID: 19268840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Image processing for craniofacial landmark identification and measurement: a review of photogrammetry and cephalometry.
    Douglas TS
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2004 Oct; 28(7):401-9. PubMed ID: 15464879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Evaluation of reproducibility and reliability of 3D soft tissue analysis using 3D stereophotogrammetry.
    Plooij JM; Swennen GR; Rangel FA; Maal TJ; Schutyser FA; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Bergé SJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 38(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 19167191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A radiographic analysis of computer prediction in conjunction with orthognathic surgery.
    Loh S; Heng JK; Ward-Booth P; Winchester L; McDonald F
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Aug; 30(4):259-63. PubMed ID: 11518345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Personal Computer-Based Cephalometric Landmark Detection With Deep Learning, Using Cephalograms on the Internet.
    Nishimoto S; Sotsuka Y; Kawai K; Ishise H; Kakibuchi M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2019 Jan; 30(1):91-95. PubMed ID: 30439733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. An evaluation of the errors in cephalometric measurements on scanned cephalometric images and conventional tracings.
    Sayinsu K; Isik F; Trakyali G; Arun T
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Feb; 29(1):105-8. PubMed ID: 17290023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Investigation of filter sets for supervised pixel classification of cephalometric landmarks by spatial spectroscopy.
    Rudolph DJ; Coggins JM; Moon H
    Int J Med Inform; 1997 Dec; 47(3):183-91. PubMed ID: 9513007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Validity of identification of gonion and antegonion in frontal cephalograms.
    Legrell PE; Nyquist H; Isberg A
    Angle Orthod; 2000 Apr; 70(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 10833005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Evaluation of Soft Tissue Landmark Reliability between Manual and Computerized Plotting Methods.
    Kasinathan G; Kommi PB; Kumar SM; Yashwant A; Arani N; Sabapathy S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Apr; 18(4):317-321. PubMed ID: 28349911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The angle between the Frankfort horizontal and the sella-nasion line. Changes in porion and orbitale position during growth.
    Greiner P; Müller B; Dibbets J
    J Orofac Orthop; 2004 May; 65(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 15160248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Is there consistency in cephalometric landmark identification amongst oral and maxillofacial surgeons?
    Miloro M; Borba AM; Ribeiro-Junior O; Naclério-Homem MG; Jungner M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 43(4):445-53. PubMed ID: 24055177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Improving accuracy and reducing errors in spinal surgery--a new technique for thoracolumbar-level localization using computer-assisted image guidance.
    Nowitzke A; Wood M; Cooney K
    Spine J; 2008; 8(4):597-604. PubMed ID: 18082459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Automatic analysis of lateral cephalograms based on high-resolution net.
    Chang Q; Wang Z; Wang F; Dou J; Zhang Y; Bai Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 Apr; 163(4):501-508.e4. PubMed ID: 36528536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Automatic localization of cephalometric landmarks based on convolutional neural network.
    Yao J; Zeng W; He T; Zhou S; Zhang Y; Guo J; Tang W
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Mar; 161(3):e250-e259. PubMed ID: 34802868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. "The pitfalls and merits of using commonly accepted orthodontic cephalometric analyses".
    Murray TM
    J Gen Orthod; 1997 Dec; 8(4):6-17. PubMed ID: 9610305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Automatic 3-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmarking via Deep Learning.
    Dot G; Schouman T; Chang S; Rafflenbeul F; Kerbrat A; Rouch P; Gajny L
    J Dent Res; 2022 Oct; 101(11):1380-1387. PubMed ID: 35982646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Evaluation of an automated superimposition method based on multiple landmarks for growing patients.
    Kim MG; Moon JH; Hwang HW; Cho SJ; Donatelli RE; Lee SJ
    Angle Orthod; 2022 Mar; 92(2):226-232. PubMed ID: 34605860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A proposal for soft tissue landmarks for craniofacial analysis using 3-dimensional laser scan imaging.
    Baik HS; Lee HJ; Lee KJ
    World J Orthod; 2006; 7(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 16548301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Cephalometric landmark variability among orthodontists and dentomaxillofacial radiologists: a comparative study.
    Durão AP; Morosolli A; Pittayapat P; Bolstad N; Ferreira AP; Jacobs R
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2015 Dec; 45(4):213-20. PubMed ID: 26730368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.