143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11094512)
1. [Callus distraction of the maxilla. Supplement or alternative to advancement osteotomy].
Roser M; Cornelius CP; Bacher M; Reinert S; Krimmel M
Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2000 Sep; 4 Suppl 2():S438-41. PubMed ID: 11094512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nonunion of the external maxillary distraction in cleft lip and palate: analysis of possible reasons.
He D; Genecov DG; Barcelo R
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Oct; 68(10):2402-11. PubMed ID: 20605305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Maxillary distraction complications in cleft patients].
Jeblaoui Y; Morand B; Brix M; Lebeau J; Bettega G
Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2008 Sep; 109(4):218-24, discussion 224-5. PubMed ID: 18703208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A meta-analysis of cleft maxillary osteotomy and distraction osteogenesis.
Cheung LK; Chua HD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 35(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 16154316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Skeletal stability and complications in transantral maxillary distraction in patients with cleft lip and palate.
Nkenke E; Vairaktaris E; Hanke S; Hoffmann B; Schlittenbauer T
J Craniofac Surg; 2014; 25(2):689-93. PubMed ID: 24621725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term follow-up of large maxillary advancements with distraction osteogenesis in growing and non-growing cleft lip and palate patients.
Meazzini MC; Basile V; Mazzoleni F; Bozzetti A; Brusati R
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Jan; 68(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 25287581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Rigid External Le Fort I Distraction Followed by Secondary Bone Grafting for Maxillary Advancements in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate.
Tobolowsky W; Gupta P; Lopez J; Cho R; Mundinger GS; Yang R; Tufaro AP
J Craniofac Surg; 2019 Oct; 30(7):1974-1978. PubMed ID: 31232986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improved outcomes in cleft patients with severe maxillary deficiency after Le Fort I internal distraction.
Kumar A; Gabbay JS; Nikjoo R; Heller JB; O'Hara CM; Sisodia M; Garri JI; Wilson LS; Kawamoto HK; Bradley JP
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Apr; 117(5):1499-509. PubMed ID: 16641719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Advancement of the anterior maxilla by distraction (case report).
Karakasis D; Hadjipetrou L
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2004 Jun; 32(3):150-4. PubMed ID: 15113572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Internal maxillary distraction with a new bimalar device.
Kahn DM; Broujerdi J; Schendel SA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Apr; 66(4):675-83. PubMed ID: 18355590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlation Between Speech Outcomes and the Amount of Maxillary Advancement After Orthognathic Surgery (Le Fort I Conventional Osteotomy and Distraction Osteogenesis) in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate.
Chung J; Lim J; Park H; Yoo A; Kim S; Koo Y
J Craniofac Surg; 2019 Sep; 30(6):1855-1858. PubMed ID: 31107383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Maxillary distraction resulting in facial advancement at Le Fort III level in cleft lip and palate patients: a report of two cases.
Zwahlen RA; Bütow KW
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Nov; 98(5):541-5. PubMed ID: 15529125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Le Fort I distraction using internal devices for maxillary hypoplasia in patients with cleft lip, palate, and alveolus: complications and their prevention and management.
Mitsukawa N; Satoh K; Morishita T
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Sep; 21(5):1428-30. PubMed ID: 20856032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term results in maxillary deficiency using intraoral devices.
Rachmiel A; Aizenbud D; Peled M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jul; 34(5):473-9. PubMed ID: 16053864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors related to relapse after Le Fort I maxillary advancement osteotomy in patients with cleft lip and palate.
Hirano A; Suzuki H
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2001 Jan; 38(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 11204674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cleft maxillary distraction versus orthognathic surgery: clinical morbidities and surgical relapse.
Cheung LK; Chua HDP; Hägg MB
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Sep; 118(4):996-1008. PubMed ID: 16980862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of growth on maxillary distraction osteogenesis in cleft lip and palate.
Doucet JC; Herlin C; Bigorre M; Bäumler C; Subsol G; Captier G
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 41(8):836-41. PubMed ID: 23541938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Soft tissue changes from maxillary distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery in patients with cleft lip and palate--a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Chua HD; Cheung LK
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 70(7):1648-58. PubMed ID: 21958662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cleft maxillary distraction versus orthognathic surgery--which one is more stable in 5 years?
Chua HD; Hägg MB; Cheung LK
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jun; 109(6):803-14. PubMed ID: 20299247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tooth-borne distraction osteogenesis versus conventional Le Fort I in maxillary advancement of cleft lip and palate patients.
Jamilian A; Showkatbakhsh R; Behnaz M; Ghassemi A; Kamalee Z; Perillo L
Minerva Stomatol; 2018 Jun; 67(3):117-124. PubMed ID: 29388417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
