These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1109690)

  • 1. Effects of amphetamine isomers and neuroleptics on self-stimulation from the nucleus accumbens and dorsal noradrenergic bundle.
    Phillips AG; Brooke SM; Fibiger HC
    Brain Res; 1975 Feb; 85(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 1109690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Decreased intracranial self-stimulation after neuroleptics or 6-hydroxydopamine: evidence for mediation by motor deficits rather than by reduced reward.
    Fibiger HC; Carter DA; Phillips AG
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1976 May; 47(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 959465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nicotine and brain-stimulation reward: interactions with morphine, amphetamine and pimozide.
    Huston-Lyons D; Sarkar M; Kornetsky C
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1993 Oct; 46(2):453-7. PubMed ID: 8265701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Catecholamines and self-stimulation: evidence suggesting a reinforcing role for noradrenaline and a motivating role for dopamine.
    Herberg LJ; Stephens DN; Franklin KB
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1976 May; 4(5):575-82. PubMed ID: 133356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Actions and interactions of amphetamine on self-stimulation in rats.
    Aulakh CS; Pradhan SN
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1979 Sep; 11(3):351-4. PubMed ID: 41267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of acute and chronic clozapine and haloperidol on in vitro release of acetylcholine and dopamine from striatum and nucleus accumbens.
    Compton DR; Johnson KM
    J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1989 Feb; 248(2):521-30. PubMed ID: 2918468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dopaminergic and noradrenergic substrates of positive reinforcement: differential effects of d- and l-amphetamine.
    Phillips AG; Fibiger HC
    Science; 1973 Feb; 179(4073):575-7. PubMed ID: 4686463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reward system depression following chronic amphetamine: antagonism by haloperidol.
    Barrett RJ; White DK
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1980 Oct; 13(4):555-9. PubMed ID: 7433486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reward summation and the effects of pimozide, clonidine, and amphetamine on fixed-interval responding for brain stimulation.
    Hunt GE; Atrens DM
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1992 Aug; 42(4):563-77. PubMed ID: 1513839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of dopamine supersensitivity on lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation in rats.
    Ettenberg A; Milner PM
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1977 Dec; 7(6):507-14. PubMed ID: 563603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pimozide and amphetamine have opposing effects on the reward summation function.
    Gallistel CR; Karras D
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1984 Jan; 20(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 6695003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of dexetimide on pimozide-, haloperidol- and pipamperone-induced inhibition of brain self-stimulation in rats.
    Wauquier A; Niemegeers CJ
    Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther; 1975 Oct; 217(2):280-92. PubMed ID: 1190923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative determination of the effects of catecholaminergic agonists and antagonists on the rewarding efficacy of brain stimulation.
    Gallistel CR; Freyd G
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1987 Apr; 26(4):731-41. PubMed ID: 3602032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term influence of d-amphetamine on mesolimbic brain-stimulation reward: comparison to chronic haloperidol and naloxone effects.
    Borowski TB; Kokkinidis L
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1992 Sep; 43(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 1409792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cortisol and GH responses to D- and L-amphetamine in monkeys.
    Marantz R; Sachar EJ; Weitzman E; Sassin J
    Endocrinology; 1976 Aug; 99(2):459-65. PubMed ID: 954645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of the dopaminergic projections in MFB self-stimulation.
    Gallistel CR
    Behav Brain Res; 1986 Jun; 20(3):313-21. PubMed ID: 3488749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Role of dopamine and norepinephrine in the chemistry of reward.
    Fibiger HC; Phillips AG
    J Psychiatr Res; 1974; 11():135-43. PubMed ID: 4461785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pharmaco-ontogeny of reward: enhancement of self-stimulation by D-amphetamine and cocaine in 3- and 10-day-old rats.
    Barr GA; Lithgow T
    Brain Res; 1986 Jan; 389(1-2):193-202. PubMed ID: 3948007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Amphetamine impairs the discriminative performance of rats with dorsal noradrenergic bundle lesions on a 5-choice serial reaction time task: new evidence for central dopaminergic-noradrenergic interactions.
    Cole BJ; Robbins TW
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1987; 91(4):458-66. PubMed ID: 3108926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intracranial self-stimulation in rats as a function of various stimulus parameters. II. Influence of haloperidol, pimozide and pipamperone on medial forebrain bundle stimulation with monopolar electrodes.
    Wauquier A; Niemegeers CJ
    Psychopharmacologia; 1972; 27(3):191-202. PubMed ID: 4642460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.