These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11098294)

  • 1. Effect of stimulus contrast uncertainty on simple reaction time.
    Mihaylova M; Vassilev A
    Acta Physiol Pharmacol Bulg; 1999; 24(4):81-90. PubMed ID: 11098294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hemisphere asymmetry of the visually evoked potentials elicited by gratings of varying spatial frequency.
    Vassilev A; Manahilov V; Mitov D; Nevskaya AA; Leushina LI
    Acta Physiol Pharmacol Bulg; 1991; 17(2-3):54-60. PubMed ID: 1819918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of grating contrast on the human visually evoked potential.
    Vassilev A; Manahilov V
    Acta Physiol Pharmacol Bulg; 1986; 12(4):53-7. PubMed ID: 3577799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Peripheral and central delay in processing high spatial frequencies: reaction time and VEP latency studies.
    Mihaylova M; Stomonyakov V; Vassilev A
    Vision Res; 1999 Feb; 39(4):699-705. PubMed ID: 10341957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How many pathways determine the speed of grating detection?
    Mitov D; Totev T
    Vision Res; 2005 Mar; 45(7):821-5. PubMed ID: 15644222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of stimulus orientation on the visual evoked potential in multiple sclerosis.
    Camisa J; Mylin LH; Bodis-Wollner I
    Ann Neurol; 1981 Dec; 10(6):532-9. PubMed ID: 7325602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of velocity, temporal frequency and initial phase position of grating patterns on motion VEP.
    Markwardt F; Göpfert E; Müller R
    Biomed Biochim Acta; 1988; 47(8):753-60. PubMed ID: 3240305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Corpus callosum has different channels for transmission of spatial frequency information.
    Kalaycioğlu C; Nalçaci E; Schmiedt-Fehr C; Başar-Eroğlu C
    Brain Res; 2009 Nov; 1296():85-93. PubMed ID: 19686709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Normal and dichromatic color discrimination measured with transient visual evoked potential.
    Gomes BD; Souza GS; Rodrigues AR; Saito CA; Silveira LC; da Silva Filho M
    Vis Neurosci; 2006; 23(3-4):617-27. PubMed ID: 16962005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interactions between attention and perceptual grouping in human visual cortex.
    Khoe W; Freeman E; Woldorff MG; Mangun GR
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):101-11. PubMed ID: 16500628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the delay in processing high spatial frequency visual information: reaction time and VEP latency study of the effect of local intensity of stimulation.
    Vassilev A; Mihaylova M; Bonnet C
    Vision Res; 2002 Mar; 42(7):851-64. PubMed ID: 11927350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Further research on the functional asymmetry between the superior and inferior visual hemifields: analysis of the reaction time to simultaneous stimulation of the two hemi-fields].
    Cocito L; Favale E; Tartaglione A
    Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper; 1979 Jun; 55(11):1077-83. PubMed ID: 549585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of stimulus orientation on the latency and amplitude of the VEP.
    Moskowitz A; Sokol S
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1985 Feb; 26(2):246-8. PubMed ID: 3972506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Parvocellular and magnocellular contributions to the initial generators of the visual evoked potential: high-density electrical mapping of the "C1" component.
    Foxe JJ; Strugstad EC; Sehatpour P; Molholm S; Pasieka W; Schroeder CE; McCourt ME
    Brain Topogr; 2008 Sep; 21(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 18784997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Flicker masking depends on the method of measurement.
    Stomonyakov V; Vassilev A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1996; 21(2-3):75-82. PubMed ID: 8792196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gender-selective effects of the P300 and N400 components of the visual evoked potential.
    Steffensen SC; Ohran AJ; Shipp DN; Hales K; Stobbs SH; Fleming DE
    Vision Res; 2008 Mar; 48(7):917-25. PubMed ID: 18291436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vision abnormalities in young children exposed prenatally to organic solvents.
    Till C; Westall CA; Koren G; Nulman I; Rovet JF
    Neurotoxicology; 2005 Aug; 26(4):599-613. PubMed ID: 16054697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual evoked potentials for red-green gratings reversing at different temporal frequencies: asymmetries with respect to isoluminance.
    Rudvin I; Valberg A
    Vis Neurosci; 2005; 22(6):735-47. PubMed ID: 16469184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hemisphere asymmetry in the detection of gratings of varying spatial frequency.
    Nevskaya AA; Leushina LI; Vassilev A; Manahilov V; Mitov D
    Acta Physiol Pharmacol Bulg; 1990; 16(3):3-10. PubMed ID: 2101539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual-evoked responses elicited by the onset and offset of sinusoidal gratings: latency, waveform, and topographic characteristics.
    Parker DM; Salzen EA; Lishman JR
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1982 May; 22(5):675-80. PubMed ID: 7076411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.