These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11098900)

  • 21. Conformance of mean glandular dose from phantom and patient data in mammography.
    Kelaranta A; Toroi P; Timonen M; Komssi S; Kortesniemi M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Apr; 164(3):342-53. PubMed ID: 25114321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A new mammography dosimetric phantom.
    Almeida CD; Coutinho CM; Dantas BM; Peixoto JE; Koch HA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(1):196-8. PubMed ID: 22223722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Monte Carlo calculation of conversion factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose.
    Dance DR
    Phys Med Biol; 1990 Sep; 35(9):1211-9. PubMed ID: 2236205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Investigating energy deposition in glandular tissues for mammography using multiscale Monte Carlo simulations.
    Oliver PAK; Thomson RM
    Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1426-1436. PubMed ID: 30657190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Patient investigation of average glandular dose and incident air kerma for digital mammography.
    Kawaguchi A; Matsunaga Y; Otsuka T; Suzuki S
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2014 Jan; 7(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 24234736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Monte Carlo generated conversion factors for the estimation of average glandular dose in contact and magnification mammography.
    Koutalonis M; Delis H; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):5539-48. PubMed ID: 17047268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Determination of average glandular dose with modern mammography units for two large groups of patients.
    Klein R; Aichinger H; Dierker J; Jansen JT; Joite-Barfuss S; Säbel M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Zoetelief J
    Phys Med Biol; 1997 Apr; 42(4):651-71. PubMed ID: 9127443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Monte Carlo simulation for the estimation of the glandular breast dose for a digital breast tomosynthesis system.
    Rodrigues L; Magalhaes LA; Braz D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Dec; 167(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 25480841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Towards standardization of x-ray beam filters in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: Monte Carlo simulations and analytical modelling.
    Shrestha S; Vedantham S; Karellas A
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 62(5):1969-1993. PubMed ID: 28075335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Patient dose in digital mammography.
    Chevalier M; Morán P; Ten JI; Fernández Soto JM; Cepeda T; Vañó E
    Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2471-9. PubMed ID: 15487727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Computation of the glandular radiation dose in digital tomosynthesis of the breast.
    Sechopoulos I; Suryanarayanan S; Vedantham S; D'Orsi C; Karellas A
    Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):221-32. PubMed ID: 17278508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Determination of equivalent breast phantoms for different age groups of Taiwanese women: an experimental approach.
    Dong SL; Chu TC; Lin YC; Lan GY; Yeh YH; Chen S; Chuanga KS
    Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38(7):4094-100. PubMed ID: 21859009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A parameterization method and application in breast tomosynthesis dosimetry.
    Li X; Zhang D; Liu B
    Med Phys; 2013 Sep; 40(9):092105. PubMed ID: 24007174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dosimetry in x-ray-based breast imaging.
    Dance DR; Sechopoulos I
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Oct; 61(19):R271-R304. PubMed ID: 27617767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dose assessment in contrast enhanced digital mammography using simple phantoms simulating standard model breasts.
    Bouwman RW; van Engen RE; Young KC; Veldkamp WJ; Dance DR
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 60(1):N1-7. PubMed ID: 25500435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Skin models and their impact on mean glandular dose in mammography.
    Massera RT; Tomal A
    Phys Med; 2018 Jul; 51():38-47. PubMed ID: 29673742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Estimation of glandular dose in mammography based on artificial neural networks.
    Trevisan Massera R; Tomal A
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 May; 65(9):095009. PubMed ID: 32101806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Average glandular dose conversion coefficients for segmented breast voxel models.
    Zankl M; Fill U; Hoeschen C; Panzer W; Regulla D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):410-4. PubMed ID: 15933148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparison of fixed and variable kVp technique protocols for film-screen mammography.
    McParland BJ; Boyd MM
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Jun; 73(870):613-26. PubMed ID: 10911785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An investigation into the impact of anatomical variation upon mean glandular dose produced within a standard breast.
    Wilkinson LE; Heggie JC; Johnston PN
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1999 Jun; 22(2):53-63. PubMed ID: 10474976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.