These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11098951)

  • 1. Electrophysiology of ventricular fibrillation and defibrillation.
    Jones JL; Tovar OH
    Crit Care Med; 2000 Nov; 28(11 Suppl):N219-21. PubMed ID: 11098951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biphasic defibrillation waveforms reduce shock-induced response duration dispersion between low and high shock intensities.
    Tovar OH; Jones JL
    Circ Res; 1995 Aug; 77(2):430-8. PubMed ID: 7614727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrophysiologic deterioration after one-minute fibrillation increases relative biphasic defibrillation efficacy.
    Tovar OH; Jones JL
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2000 Jun; 11(6):645-51. PubMed ID: 10868738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Threshold reduction with biphasic defibrillator waveforms. Role of charge balance.
    Jones JL; Tovar OH
    J Electrocardiol; 1995; 28 Suppl():25-30. PubMed ID: 8656123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can shocks timed to action potentials in low-gradient regions improve both internal and out-of-hospital defibrillation?
    Jones J; Noe W; Tovar O; Lin Y; Hsu W
    J Electrocardiol; 1998; 31 Suppl():41-4. PubMed ID: 9988004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reentry site during fibrillation induction in relation to defibrillation efficacy for different shock waveforms.
    Ideker RE; Alferness C; Melnick S; Sreenan KM; Johnson E; Smith WM
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2001 May; 12(5):581-91. PubMed ID: 11386521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of monophasic and biphasic defibrillating pulse waveforms for transthoracic cardioversion. Biphasic Waveform Defibrillation Investigators.
    Greene HL; DiMarco JP; Kudenchuk PJ; Scheinman MM; Tang AS; Reiter MJ; Echt DS; Chapman PD; Jazayeri MR; Chapman FW
    Am J Cardiol; 1995 Jun; 75(16):1135-9. PubMed ID: 7762500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mechanisms of electrical defibrillation: impact of new experimental defibrillator waveforms.
    Blanchard SM; Ideker RE
    Am Heart J; 1994 Apr; 127(4 Pt 2):970-7. PubMed ID: 8160601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Postshock potential gradients and dispersion of repolarization in cells stimulated with monophasic and biphasic waveforms.
    Sobie EA; Tung L
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1998 Jul; 9(7):743-56. PubMed ID: 9684722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting the relative efficacy of shock waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation in dogs.
    White JB; Walcott GP; Wayland JL; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Ann Emerg Med; 1999 Sep; 34(3):309-20. PubMed ID: 10459086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conditioning prepulse of biphasic defibrillator waveforms enhances refractoriness to fibrillation wavefronts.
    Swartz JF; Jones JL; Jones RE; Fletcher R
    Circ Res; 1991 Feb; 68(2):438-49. PubMed ID: 1991348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationship between "extension of refractoriness" and probability of successful defibrillation.
    Tovar OH; Jones JL
    Am J Physiol; 1997 Feb; 272(2 Pt 2):H1011-9. PubMed ID: 9124409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electrophysiological deterioration during long-duration ventricular fibrillation.
    Tovar OH; Jones JL
    Circulation; 2000 Dec; 102(23):2886-91. PubMed ID: 11104749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prolongation of repolarization time by electric field stimulation with monophasic and biphasic shocks in open-chest dogs.
    Zhou XH; Knisley SB; Wolf PD; Rollins DL; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Circ Res; 1991 Jun; 68(6):1761-7. PubMed ID: 2036724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Epicardial mapping of ventricular defibrillation with monophasic and biphasic shocks in dogs.
    Zhou X; Daubert JP; Wolf PD; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Circ Res; 1993 Jan; 72(1):145-60. PubMed ID: 8417837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of monophasic and biphasic shocks on action potentials during ventricular fibrillation in dogs.
    Zhou X; Wolf PD; Rollins DL; Afework Y; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Circ Res; 1993 Aug; 73(2):325-34. PubMed ID: 8330375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experimental verification of theoretical predictions concerning the optimum defibrillation waveform.
    Malkin RA; Jackson SR; Nguyen J; Yang Z; Guan D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Aug; 53(8):1492-8. PubMed ID: 16916083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Increasing fibrillation duration enhances relative asymmetrical biphasic versus monophasic defibrillator waveform efficacy.
    Jones JL; Swartz JF; Jones RE; Fletcher R
    Circ Res; 1990 Aug; 67(2):376-84. PubMed ID: 2376078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of second and third phase duration on defibrillation efficacy of triphasic rectangle waveforms.
    Tang C; Wang P; Gong Y; Wei L; Li Y; Zhang S
    Resuscitation; 2016 May; 102():57-62. PubMed ID: 26939971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Threshold reduction with biphasic defibrillator waveforms. Role of excitation channel recovery in a computer model of the ventricular action potential.
    Jones JL; Jones RE
    J Electrocardiol; 1990; 23 Suppl():30-5. PubMed ID: 2090758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.