409 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11099007)
1. Election impasse leaves science in the dark.
Reichhardt T; Smaglik P
Nature; 2000 Nov; 408(6810):279. PubMed ID: 11099007
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinton's farewell gift to US science agencies.
Macilwain C; Reichhardt T; Smaglik P
Nature; 2000 Feb; 403(6770):585. PubMed ID: 10688168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. U.S. science budget. Science agencies caught in postelection spending squeeze.
Lawler A; Mervis J
Science; 2004 Dec; 306(5702):1662-3. PubMed ID: 15576575
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. 1997 budget confirms US science faces a period of flat funding.
Macilwain C
Nature; 1996 Mar; 380(6571):187. PubMed ID: 8637559
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. U.S. research funding. Science adviser says that pruning is the key to a healthy budget.
Mervis J
Science; 2007 Feb; 315(5814):927. PubMed ID: 17303728
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. U.S. science policy. GOP takes Senate, budget uncertain.
Malakoff D
Science; 2002 Nov; 298(5597):1313. PubMed ID: 12434024
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. "Glocal" science advocacy.
Leshner AI
Science; 2008 Feb; 319(5865):877. PubMed ID: 18276853
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Election 2002 update: the fallout for NIH appropriations.
Olds JL
Anat Rec B New Anat; 2003 Jan; 270(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 12526060
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Gore pledges support for bioscience.
Wadman M
Nature; 2000 Sep; 407(6801):118. PubMed ID: 11001023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Science policy. Caught in the squeeze.
Mervis J
Science; 2005 Feb; 307(5711):832-4. PubMed ID: 15705818
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. First Bush budget set to favour life sciences.
Davis M
Nature; 2001 Feb; 409(6823):969. PubMed ID: 11234034
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Big money, little science?
Nat Immunol; 2008 Nov; 9(11):1199. PubMed ID: 18936775
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Bush's belt-tightening budget offers science slim pickings.
Brumfiel G
Nature; 2004 Feb; 427(6974):475. PubMed ID: 14765158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Republicans seek freeze on health research.
Wadman M
Nature; 1996 May; 381(6579):177. PubMed ID: 8622745
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. U.S. budget 2009. A science budget of choices and chances.
Mervis J
Science; 2008 Feb; 319(5864):714-5. PubMed ID: 18258869
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Senator seeks reassurance on NIH budget.
Wadman M
Nature; 1999 Jan; 397(6715):94. PubMed ID: 9923666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Research funding. Politics and funding in the U.S. public biomedical R&D system.
Hegde D; Mowery DC
Science; 2008 Dec; 322(5909):1797-8. PubMed ID: 19095928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Managing science. House votes to kill grants, limit travel to meetings.
Kaiser J
Science; 2004 Sep; 305(5691):1688. PubMed ID: 15375232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinton proposes $2.8 billion increase in science funding.
Dalton R
Nature; 2000 Jan; 403(6768):349. PubMed ID: 10667757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Washington Report. Health and science policies--a look ahead.
Greenberg DS
N Engl J Med; 1978 Dec; 299(26):1475-6. PubMed ID: 714144
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
