These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

409 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11099007)

  • 21. Lobbyists anticipate more money for all.
    Macilwain C; Smaglik P
    Nature; 2000 Jan; 403(6766):123. PubMed ID: 10671144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Under new management.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 2001 Dec 20-27; 414(6866):839. PubMed ID: 11780025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cuts loom for US science.
    Semeniuk I; Thompson H
    Nature; 2012 Jul; 487(7408):414-5. PubMed ID: 22836976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Gridlock stalls NIH budget rise.
    Smaglik P
    Nature; 2000 Dec; 408(6813):627. PubMed ID: 11130032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. U.S. science funding. Research catches a break in catch-all spending bill.
    Mervis J; Lawler A; Kaiser J
    Science; 2003 Dec; 302(5651):1636-7. PubMed ID: 14657461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. U.S. budget. Agencies sweat the details of spending billions more on science.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2009 Feb; 323(5915):696-7. PubMed ID: 19197027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Research for hire.
    Serafini MW
    Natl J (Wash); 1996 Mar; 28(13):704-8. PubMed ID: 10155831
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Main agencies hang on to funds in skimpy US science budget.
    Brumfiel G
    Nature; 2005 Feb; 433(7026):559-60. PubMed ID: 15703709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Science policy. A budget with big winners and losers.
    Kintisch E; Mervis J
    Science; 2006 Feb; 311(5762):762-4. PubMed ID: 16469890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. U.S. science policy. Nobelists go four-on-one with Cheney.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2003 Nov; 302(5650):1487. PubMed ID: 14645816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Appropriations. House bill signals the end of NIH's double-digit growth.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2003 Jun; 300(5628):2019. PubMed ID: 12829757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Republican win sparks fears for science funds.
    Brumfiel G
    Nature; 2002 Nov; 420(6912):113. PubMed ID: 12432355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Less rosy view of science funding.
    Miller HI
    Nature; 1996 Jul; 382(6586):18. PubMed ID: 8657296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. U.S. budget. Democratic Congress begins to put its stamp on science.
    Kintisch E
    Science; 2007 Jun; 316(5833):1828-9. PubMed ID: 17600191
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Lobbyists elated as the NIH wins $2bn budget increase.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 1998 Oct; 395(6704):734. PubMed ID: 9796802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Republican warns of $35-billion cut in 1996 budget.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 1995 Jan; 373(6512):272. PubMed ID: 7830753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Washington Report. When politicians talk about research.
    Greenberg DS
    N Engl J Med; 1979 Apr; 300(17):999-1000. PubMed ID: 431592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. US midterm elections offer little hope for science.
    Morello L
    Nature; 2014 Oct; 514(7523):412-3. PubMed ID: 25341766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. NIH budget prospect bright despite political stalemate.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1999 Jul; 400(6743):391. PubMed ID: 10440355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Researchers accused of wanting to rob the poor to give to NIH.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1998 Aug; 394(6694):609. PubMed ID: 9716118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.