These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11099558)

  • 1. The use of a cyanoacrylate adhesive for bonding orthodontic brackets: an ex-vivo study.
    Al-Munajed MK; Gordon PH; McCabe JF
    J Orthod; 2000 Sep; 27(3):255-60. PubMed ID: 11099558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An ex vivo investigation to compare orthodontic bonding using a 4-META-based adhesive or a composite adhesive to acid-etched and sandblasted enamel.
    Clark SA; Gordon PH; McCabe JF
    J Orthod; 2003 Mar; 30(1):51-8; discussion 23. PubMed ID: 12644608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Shear bond strength of brackets bonded to amalgam with different intermediate resins and adhesives.
    Germec D; Cakan U; Ozdemir FI; Arun T; Cakan M
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 19073953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bond strength of orthodontic brackets using different light and self-curing cements.
    Toledano M; Osorio R; Osorio E; Romeo A; de la Higuera B; García-Godoy F
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Feb; 73(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 12607856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vivo evaluation of a moisture-activated orthodontic adhesive: a comparative clinical trial.
    Karamouzos A; Mavropoulos A; Athanasiou AE; Kolokithas G
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2002 Aug; 5(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 12194667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of enamel bleaching on the shear bond strengths of metal and ceramic brackets.
    Oztaş E; Bağdelen G; Kiliçoğlu H; Ulukapi H; Aydin I
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Apr; 34(2):232-7. PubMed ID: 21262931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of modifying the adhesive composition on the bond strength of orthodontic brackets.
    Bishara SE; Ajlouni R; Laffoon J; Warren J
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):464-7. PubMed ID: 12401056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does ozone water affect the bond strengths of orthodontic brackets?
    Pithon MM; dos Santos RL
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 May; 26(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 20575204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of stresses developed in different bracket-cement-enamel systems using finite element analysis with in vitro bond strength tests.
    Elsaka SE; Hammad SM; Ibrahim NF
    Prog Orthod; 2014 Apr; 15(1):33. PubMed ID: 24934213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of modifying the bonding protocol on the shear bond strength of metallic and ceramic orthodontic brackets.
    Fernandes TM; Janson G; Somensi J; Pinzan A; Francisconi PA; Sathler R; Henriques JF
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 22313980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bonding orthodontic brackets to porcelain using different adhesives/enamel conditioners: a comparative study.
    Bishara SE; Ajlouni R; Oonsombat C; Laffoon J
    World J Orthod; 2005; 6(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 15794038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of applying a sustained force during bonding orthodontic brackets on the adhesive layer and on shear bond strength.
    Montasser MA
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):402-6. PubMed ID: 21030470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with different self-etching adhesives.
    Scougall Vilchis RJ; Yamamoto S; Kitai N; Yamamoto K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 19732677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bond strength of ceramic brackets bonded to enamel with amorphous calcium phosphate-containing orthodontic composite.
    Uysal T; Ustdal A; Nur M; Catalbas B
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):281-4. PubMed ID: 20080960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro evaluation of a moisture-active adhesive for indirect bonding.
    Klocke A; Shi J; Kahl-Nieke B; Bismayer U
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Dec; 73(6):697-701. PubMed ID: 14719735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Shear/peel bond strength of repositioned ceramic brackets.
    Gaffey PG; Major PW; Glover K; Grace M; Koehler JR
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(5):351-7. PubMed ID: 8526294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the bond strength of different bracket-bonding systems to bovine enamel.
    Nkenke E; Hirschfelder U; Martus P; Eberhard H
    Eur J Orthod; 1997 Jun; 19(3):259-70. PubMed ID: 9239956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A laboratory investigation to compare enamel preparation by sandblasting or acid etching prior to bracket bonding.
    Sargison AE; McCabe JF; Millett DT
    Br J Orthod; 1999 Jun; 26(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 10420249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors affecting the shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded to different ceramic surfaces.
    Abu Alhaija ES; Abu AlReesh IA; AlWahadni AM
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 19903729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.