These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11099639)

  • 1. A computationally based identification algorithm for estrogen receptor ligands: part 2. Evaluation of a hERalpha binding affinity model.
    Mekenyan OG; Kamenska V; Schmieder PK; Ankley GT; Bradbury SP
    Toxicol Sci; 2000 Dec; 58(2):270-81. PubMed ID: 11099639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A computationally based identification algorithm for estrogen receptor ligands: part 1. Predicting hERalpha binding affinity.
    Bradbury S; Kamenska V; Schmieder P; Ankley G; Mekenyan O
    Toxicol Sci; 2000 Dec; 58(2):253-69. PubMed ID: 11099638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development and validation of an average mammalian estrogen receptor-based QSAR model.
    Mekenya O; Kamenska V; Serafimova R; Poellinger L; Brouwer A; Walker J
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2002 Oct; 13(6):579-95. PubMed ID: 12479373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The estrogen receptor relative binding affinities of 188 natural and xenochemicals: structural diversity of ligands.
    Blair RM; Fang H; Branham WS; Hass BS; Dial SL; Moland CL; Tong W; Shi L; Perkins R; Sheehan DM
    Toxicol Sci; 2000 Mar; 54(1):138-53. PubMed ID: 10746941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of estrogen receptor binding for 58,000 chemicals using an integrated system of a tree-based model with structural alerts.
    Hong H; Tong W; Fang H; Shi L; Xie Q; Wu J; Perkins R; Walker JD; Branham W; Sheehan DM
    Environ Health Perspect; 2002 Jan; 110(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 11781162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) for estrogen binding to the estrogen receptor: predictions across species.
    Tong W; Perkins R; Strelitz R; Collantes ER; Keenan S; Welsh WJ; Branham WS; Sheehan DM
    Environ Health Perspect; 1997 Oct; 105(10):1116-24. PubMed ID: 9353176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of estrogen receptor alpha and beta subtypes based on comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA).
    Xing L; Welsh WJ; Tong W; Perkins R; Sheehan DM
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 1999; 10(2-3):215-37. PubMed ID: 10491851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction of ligand binding affinity and orientation of xenoestrogens to the estrogen receptor by molecular dynamics simulations and the linear interaction energy method.
    van Lipzig MM; ter Laak AM; Jongejan A; Vermeulen NP; Wamelink M; Geerke D; Meerman JH
    J Med Chem; 2004 Feb; 47(4):1018-30. PubMed ID: 14761204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. CoMFA and docking study of novel estrogen receptor subtype selective ligands.
    Wolohan P; Reichert DE
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2003; 17(5-6):313-28. PubMed ID: 14635724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Synthesis and evaluation of 17alpha-20E-21-(4-substituted phenyl)-19-norpregna-1,3,5(10),20-tetraene-3,17beta-diols as probes for the estrogen receptor alpha hormone binding domain.
    Hanson RN; Lee CY; Friel CJ; Dilis R; Hughes A; DeSombre ER
    J Med Chem; 2003 Jul; 46(14):2865-76. PubMed ID: 12825929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. CoMSIA and docking study of rhenium based estrogen receptor ligand analogs.
    Wolohan P; Reichert DE
    Steroids; 2007 Mar; 72(3):247-60. PubMed ID: 17280694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of trout liver slices to enhance mechanistic interpretation of estrogen receptor binding for cost-effective prioritization of chemicals within large inventories.
    Schmieder PK; Tapper MA; Denny JS; Kolanczyk RC; Sheedy BR; Henry TR; Veith GD
    Environ Sci Technol; 2004 Dec; 38(23):6333-42. PubMed ID: 15597890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of relative binding affinities to fish and mammalian estrogen receptors: the regulatory implications.
    Dang Z
    Toxicol Lett; 2010 Feb; 192(3):298-315. PubMed ID: 19913605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Structure-activity relationship study of a diverse set of estrogen receptor ligands (I) using MultiCASE expert system.
    Klopman G; Chakravarti SK
    Chemosphere; 2003 May; 51(6):445-59. PubMed ID: 12615096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of 17alpha-E-(trifluoromethylphenyl)vinyl estradiols as novel estrogen receptor ligands.
    Hanson RN; Lee CY; Friel C; Hughes A; DeSombre ER
    Steroids; 2003 Feb; 68(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 12606005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An integrated "4-phase" approach for setting endocrine disruption screening priorities--phase I and II predictions of estrogen receptor binding affinity.
    Shi L; Tong W; Fang H; Xie Q; Hong H; Perkins R; Wu J; Tu M; Blair RM; Branham WS; Waller C; Walker J; Sheehan DM
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2002 Mar; 13(1):69-88. PubMed ID: 12074393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of new hydroxylated triphenylethylene (TPE) derivatives on estradiol binding to uterine cytosol.
    Pons M; Michel F; Crastes de Paulet A; Gilbert J; Miquel JF; Précigoux G; Hospital M; Ojasoo T; Raynaud JP
    J Steroid Biochem; 1984 Jan; 20(1):137-45. PubMed ID: 6423897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Synthesis and biological evaluation of phenolic 4,5-dihydroisoxazoles and 3-hydroxy ketones as estrogen receptor alpha and beta agonists.
    Poutiainen PK; Venäläinen TA; Peräkylä M; Matilainen JM; Väisänen S; Honkakoski P; Laatikainen R; Pulkkinen JT
    Bioorg Med Chem; 2010 May; 18(10):3437-47. PubMed ID: 20430632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Phytoestrogens and mycoestrogens bind to the rat uterine estrogen receptor.
    Branham WS; Dial SL; Moland CL; Hass BS; Blair RM; Fang H; Shi L; Tong W; Perkins RG; Sheehan DM
    J Nutr; 2002 Apr; 132(4):658-64. PubMed ID: 11925457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A reactivity pattern for discrimination of ER agonism and antagonism based on 3-D molecular attributes.
    Schmieder P; Koleva Y; Mekenyan O
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2002 Mar; 13(2):353-64. PubMed ID: 12071661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.