These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11100890)

  • 1. Recognition thresholds for letters with simulated dioptric blur.
    Akutsu H; Bedell HE; Patel SS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2000 Oct; 77(10):524-30. PubMed ID: 11100890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Individual Letter Contrast Thresholds: Effect of Object Frequency and Noise.
    Hall C; Wang S; McAnany JJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Dec; 92(12):1125-32. PubMed ID: 26540471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of letter and Vernier acuities with dioptric and diffusive blur.
    Bedell HE; Patel S; Chung ST
    Optom Vis Sci; 1999 Feb; 76(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 10082058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of optical defocus on detection and recognition of vanishing optotype letters in the fovea and periphery.
    Shah N; Dakin SC; Anderson RS
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Oct; 53(11):7063-70. PubMed ID: 22969070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatial-frequency characteristics of letter identification.
    Alexander KR; Xie W; Derlacki DJ
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 1994 Sep; 11(9):2375-82. PubMed ID: 7931762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatial-frequency characteristics of letter identification in central and peripheral vision.
    Chung ST; Legge GE; Tjan BS
    Vision Res; 2002 Aug; 42(18):2137-152. PubMed ID: 12207975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Phase changes induced by optical aberrations degrade letter and face acuity.
    Ravikumar S; Bradley A; Thibos L
    J Vis; 2010 Dec; 10(14):18. PubMed ID: 21163955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Higher-contrast requirements for recognizing low-pass-filtered letters.
    Kwon M; Legge GE
    J Vis; 2013 Jan; 13(1):13. PubMed ID: 23302216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spatial-frequency properties of letter identification in amblyopia.
    Chung ST; Levi DM; Legge GE; Tjan BS
    Vision Res; 2002 Jun; 42(12):1571-81. PubMed ID: 12074951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Shift in spatial scale in identifying crowded letters.
    Chung ST; Tjan BS
    Vision Res; 2007 Feb; 47(4):437-51. PubMed ID: 17223153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of contrast polarity on letter identification.
    Alexander KR; Xie W; Derlacki DJ
    Vision Res; 1993 Dec; 33(17):2491-7. PubMed ID: 8249329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity for individual Sloan letters.
    Alexander KR; Xie W; Derlacki DJ
    Vision Res; 1997 Mar; 37(6):813-9. PubMed ID: 9156226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of exposure duration on visual acuity for letter optotypes and gratings.
    McAnany JJ
    Vision Res; 2014 Dec; 105():86-91. PubMed ID: 25281413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identification of band-pass filtered letters and faces by human and ideal observers.
    Gold J; Bennett PJ; Sekuler AB
    Vision Res; 1999 Oct; 39(21):3537-60. PubMed ID: 10746125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optotype recognition under degradation: comparison of size, contrast, blur, noise and contour-perturbation effects.
    Westheimer G
    Clin Exp Optom; 2016 Jan; 99(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 26792583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of dioptric blur on Snellen and grating acuity.
    Thorn F; Schwartz F
    Optom Vis Sci; 1990 Jan; 67(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 2308749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contrast sensitivity for letter and grating targets under various stimulus conditions.
    Herse PR; Bedell HE
    Optom Vis Sci; 1989 Nov; 66(11):774-81. PubMed ID: 2616138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of defocus on edge contrast sensitivity.
    Jansonius NM; Kooijman AC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1997 Mar; 17(2):128-32. PubMed ID: 9196675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Foveal blur discrimination of the human eye.
    Wang B; Ciuffreda KJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Jan; 25(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 15649182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contour interaction for high and low contrast optotypes in normal and amblyopic observers.
    Simmers AJ; Gray LS; McGraw PV; Winn B
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1999 May; 19(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 10627844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.