These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11101183)

  • 1. The effect of windspeed on pollen and spore counts collected with the Rotorod Sampler and Burkard spore trap.
    Frenz DA
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2000 Nov; 85(5):392-4. PubMed ID: 11101183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing pollen and spore counts collected with the Rotorod Sampler and Burkard spore trap.
    Frenz DA
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 1999 Nov; 83(5):341-7; quiz 348-9. PubMed ID: 10582712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sampling characteristics of the Rotorod, Rotoslide and Andersen machines for atmospheric pollen and spores.
    Batchelder GL
    Ann Allergy; 1977 Jul; 39(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 883688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the Burkard and Allergenco MK-3 volumetric collectors.
    Portnoy J; Landuyt J; Pacheco F; Flappan S; Simon S; Barnes C
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2000 Jan; 84(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 10674560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A side-by-side comparison of Rotorod and Burkard pollen and spore collections.
    Crisp HC; Gomez RA; White KM; Quinn JM
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2013 Aug; 111(2):118-25. PubMed ID: 23886230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relative efficiencies of the Burkard 7-Day, Rotorod and Burkard Personal Samplers for Poaceae and Urticaceae pollen under field conditions.
    Peel RG; Kennedy R; Smith M; Hertel O
    Ann Agric Environ Med; 2014; 21(4):745-52. PubMed ID: 25528914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of pollen recovery by three models of the Rotorod sampler.
    Frenz DA; Lince NL
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 1997 Sep; 79(3):256-8. PubMed ID: 9305234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pollen recovery in atmospheric samples collected with the Rotorod Sampler over multiple-day periods such as weekends.
    Frenz DA; Boire AA
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 1999 Sep; 83(3):217-21. PubMed ID: 10507266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experimental methods to determine inhalability and personal sampler performance for aerosols in ultra-low windspeed environments.
    Schmees DK; Wu YH; Vincent JH
    J Environ Monit; 2008 Dec; 10(12):1426-36. PubMed ID: 19037484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of outdoor allergenic particles and allergen levels.
    Barnes C; Schreiber K; Pacheco F; Landuyt J; Hu F; Portnoy J
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2000 Jan; 84(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 10674565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Total airborne mold particle sampling: evaluation of sample collection, preparation and counting procedures, and collection devices.
    Godish D; Godish T
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Feb; 5(2):100-6. PubMed ID: 18085480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new method for simultaneous immunodetection and morphologic identification of individual sources of pollen allergens.
    Razmovski V; O'Meara TJ; Taylor DJ; Tovey ER
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2000 Apr; 105(4):725-31. PubMed ID: 10756222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interpreting atmospheric pollen counts for use in clinical allergy: spatial variability.
    Frenz DA
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2000 May; 84(5):481-9; quiz 489-91. PubMed ID: 10831000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of four bioaerosol samplers in the outdoor environment.
    Cage BR; Schreiber K; Barnes C; Portnoy J
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 1996 Nov; 77(5):401-6. PubMed ID: 8933779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Airborne Cupressaceae pollen in southern Italy.
    Caiaffa MF; Macchia L; Strada S; Bariletto G; Scarpelli F; Tursi A
    Ann Allergy; 1993 Jul; 71(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 8328713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of a high-volume portable bioaerosol sampler in laboratory and field environments.
    An HR; Mainelis G; Yao M
    Indoor Air; 2004 Dec; 14(6):385-93. PubMed ID: 15500631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. First annual register of allergenic pollen in Talca, Chile.
    Mardones P; Grau M; Araya J; Córdova A; Pereira I; Peñailillo P; Silva R; Moraga A; Aguilera-Insunza R; Yepes-Nuñez JJ; Palomo I
    Allergol Immunopathol (Madr); 2013; 41(4):233-8. PubMed ID: 23141838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Juniper pollen monitoring by Burkard sampler in Galveston, Texas, USA and Japanese cedar pollen counting in Fukuoka, Japan -- introduction of Pan American Aerobiology Association protocol counting technique].
    Kishikawa R; M-Horiuti T; Togawa A; Kondoh Y; Janzy PD; Goldblum RM; Kotoh E; Shimoda T; Shoji S; Nishima S; Brooks EG
    Arerugi; 2004 Jun; 53(6):582-8. PubMed ID: 15247520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Associations between pollen counts, pollutants, and asthma-related hospital admissions in a high-density Indian metropolis.
    Ghosh D; Chakraborty P; Gupta J; Biswas A; Roy I; Das S; Gupta-Bhattacharya S
    J Asthma; 2012 Oct; 49(8):792-9. PubMed ID: 22978307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Methods of studying airborne pollen and pollen calendars].
    Thibaudon M; Caillaud D; Besancenot JP
    Rev Mal Respir; 2013 Jun; 30(6):463-79. PubMed ID: 23835319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.