BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11101762)

  • 1. Direct action.
    Cotter-Howells J
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Dec; 18(12):1227. PubMed ID: 11101762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. US public opinion divided over biotechnology?
    Priest SH
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Sep; 18(9):939-42. PubMed ID: 10973211
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rockefeller head warns of backlash.
    Lehrman S
    Nature; 1999 Oct; 401(6756):831-2. PubMed ID: 10553888
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changing attitudes to biotechnology in Japan.
    Macer D; Ng MA
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Sep; 18(9):945-7. PubMed ID: 10973213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Democratization is more than lower prices.
    Cayford J
    Science; 2003 Jul; 301(5630):167; author reply 167. PubMed ID: 12855789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How important is genetic engineering to European seed firms?
    Arundel A; Hocke M; Tait J
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Jun; 18(6):578. PubMed ID: 10835548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Food biotechnology in the new millennium: promises, realities, and challenges.
    McCullum C
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2000 Nov; 100(11):1311-5. PubMed ID: 11103652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genetic engineering: unnatural selection.
    Snow A
    Nature; 2003 Aug; 424(6949):619. PubMed ID: 12904767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Consumer acceptance of biotechnology and the role of second generation technologies in the USA and Europe.
    Lusk JL; Rozan A
    Trends Biotechnol; 2005 Aug; 23(8):386-7. PubMed ID: 15953650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New Zealand GMO incident highlights lack of standardized tests.
    Norrie C
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Sep; 20(9):861. PubMed ID: 12205493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The global status of the commercialized biotechnological/genetically modified crops: 2006].
    Clive J
    Tsitol Genet; 2007; 41(3):10-2. PubMed ID: 17649619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Farmer fined for growing GM seed.
    Spurgeon D
    Nature; 2001 Apr; 410(6829):615. PubMed ID: 11287907
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. This should not be the end for terminator technology in GM crops.
    Jackson A; Inglehearn C
    Nature; 1999 Dec; 402(6761):457. PubMed ID: 10591198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Crystal gazing the new biotechnologies.
    Hodgson J
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Jan; 18(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 10625386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Enhancing the crops to feed the poor.
    Huang J; Pray C; Rozelle S
    Nature; 2002 Aug; 418(6898):678-84. PubMed ID: 12167874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ag biotech moves to mollify its critics.
    Enserink M
    Science; 1999 Nov; 286(5445):1666-8. PubMed ID: 10610558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genetic technologies. Genomics, genetic engineering, and domestication of crops.
    Strauss SH
    Science; 2003 Apr; 300(5616):61-2. PubMed ID: 12677045
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. New Zealand backs GM technologies.
    Norrie C
    Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Sep; 19(9):792. PubMed ID: 11533620
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hub of alternative energy.
    Gewin V
    Nature; 2007 Mar; 446(7131):106. PubMed ID: 17370360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biotech panel set up in US may help allay public fears.
    Reichhardt T
    Nature; 1999 Jun; 399(6736):508. PubMed ID: 10376584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.