These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11102)

  • 1. Suprression of local graft-versus-host reactions by mouse fetal and newborn spleen cells.
    Skowron-Cendrzak A; Ptak W
    Eur J Immunol; 1976 Jun; 6(6):451-2. PubMed ID: 11102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Splenic suppressor cells in fetal and newborn mice.
    Skowron-Cendrzak A; Ptak W
    Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 1978; 26(1-6):1091-4. PubMed ID: 35124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of immunosuppression generated by the graft-versus-host reaction. II. Characterization of the suppression cell and its mechanism of action.
    Shand FL
    Immunology; 1976 Dec; 31(6):943-51. PubMed ID: 11181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fetal suppressor cells. Their influence on the cell-mediated immune responses.
    Ptak W; Skowron-Cendrzak S
    Transplantation; 1977 Jul; 24(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 18819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mutual recognition of parental and F1 lymphocytes. II. Analysis of graft-vs-host-induced suppressor cell activity for T cell-mediated lympholysis to trinitrophenyl self and alloantigens.
    Polisson RP; Shearer GM
    J Immunol; 1980 Oct; 125(4):1865-61. PubMed ID: 6967920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Suppression of xenogeneic local graft versus host reaction by rat fetal spleen cells.
    Skowron-Cendrzak A; Rybczyńska Z; Sajak A; Dobrowolski Z
    Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 1984; 32(4):443-6. PubMed ID: 6534317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Subpopulations of mouse T lymphocytes. II. Suppression of graft-vs.-host reactions by naturally proliferating splenic T cells.
    Moorhead JW
    Eur J Immunol; 1978 Mar; 8(3):163-7. PubMed ID: 26575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of immunosuppression generated by the graft-versus-host reaction. I. A suppressor T-cell component studied in vivo.
    Shand FL
    Immunology; 1975 Dec; 29(6):953-65. PubMed ID: 325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ly and Ia phenotype of suppressor T cells induced by graft-vs.-host reaction.
    Shand FL
    Eur J Immunol; 1977 Oct; 7(10):746-8. PubMed ID: 73466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of naturally occurring suppressor cells of systemic graft versus host reaction (GvHR in fetal and newborn mice.
    Rybczyńska Z; Sajak A; Skowron-Cendrzak A
    Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 1981; 29(3):341-5. PubMed ID: 6457582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Suppressor T cells arising in mice undergoing a graft-vs-host response.
    Pickel K; Hoffmann MK
    J Immunol; 1977 Feb; 118(2):653-6. PubMed ID: 14213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Immunosuppression of normal lymphoid cells by serum from mice undergoing chronic graft-vs-host disease.
    McMaster R; Levy JG
    J Immunol; 1975 Nov; 115(5):1400-3. PubMed ID: 240891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inhibition of the graft-versus-host reaction. I. Reduction of the graft-versus-host potential of mouse spleen cells (with a sparing of stem cells) by treatment with antilymphocyte globulin-derived Fab fragments.
    Gallagher MT; Richie ER; Heim LR; Judd KP; Trentin JJ
    Transplantation; 1972 Nov; 14(5):597-602. PubMed ID: 4404282
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Kinetics of natural killer cell cytotoxicity during the graft-versus-host reaction. Relationship between natural killer cell activity, T and B cell activity, and development of histopathological alterations.
    Ghayur T; Seemayer TA; Lapp WS
    Transplantation; 1987 Aug; 44(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 3498241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Regulation of cell-mediated cytotoxicity. III. Synergism of cortico-resistant with anti-thymocyte serum-resistant splenic T cells in the generation of cytotoxic lymphocytes in graft-vs-host reactions.
    Babu UM; Sabbadini E
    J Immunol; 1977 Aug; 119(2):781-5. PubMed ID: 18543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interaction of cholera toxin and toxin derivatives with lymphocytes. III. Modulating effects in vivo by cholera toxin on the graft-versus-host reactivity of lymphoid cells: suggested inhibition of suppressor cells.
    Lange S; Lindholm L; Holmgren J
    Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol; 1978; 57(4):364-74. PubMed ID: 26637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The disappearance of the foetal suppressor cell activity in newborn rats.
    Bubak-Satora M
    Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 1985; 33(5):637-43. PubMed ID: 2939814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Involvement of IFN-gamma and transforming growth factor-beta in graft-vs-host reaction-associated immunosuppression.
    Huchet R; Bruley-Rosset M; Mathiot C; Grandjon D; Halle-Pannenko O
    J Immunol; 1993 Mar; 150(6):2517-24. PubMed ID: 8450227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Suppression of the mixed leukocyte response and of graft-vs-host disease by spleen cells following total lymphoid irradiation (TLI).
    King DP; Srober S; Kaplan HS
    J Immunol; 1981 Mar; 126(3):1140-5. PubMed ID: 6450802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Antilymphocytic antibodies and marrow transplantation. VII. Two of nine monoclonal anti-Thy-1 antibodies used for pretreatment of donor marrow suppressed graft-versus-host reactions without added complement.
    Thierfelder S; Cobbold S; Kummer U; Waldmann H; Schuh R
    Exp Hematol; 1985 Oct; 13(9):948-55. PubMed ID: 2864278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.