330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11103581)
1. The physical properties of packable and conventional posterior resin-based composites: a comparison.
Cobb DS; MacGregor KM; Vargas MA; Denehy GE
J Am Dent Assoc; 2000 Nov; 131(11):1610-5. PubMed ID: 11103581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does the wear resistance of packable composite equal that of dental amalgam?
Suzuki S
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2004; 16(6):355-65; discussion 365-7. PubMed ID: 15801341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Wear resistance of packable resin composites after simulated toothbrushing test.
Wang L; Garcia FC; Amarante de Araújo P; Franco EB; Mondelli RF
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2004; 16(5):303-14; discussion 314-5. PubMed ID: 15726799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The suitability of packable resin-based composites for posterior restorations.
Manhart J; Chen HY; Hickel R
J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 May; 132(5):639-45. PubMed ID: 11367968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Physical properties of three packable resin-composite restorative materials.
Kelsey WP; Latta MA; Shaddy RS; Stanislav CM
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):331-5. PubMed ID: 11203839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Properties of packable dental composites.
Choi KK; Ferracane JL; Hilton TJ; Charlton D
J Esthet Dent; 2000; 12(4):216-26. PubMed ID: 11323865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fracture toughness of packable and conventional composite materials.
Knobloch LA; Kerby RE; Seghi R; Berlin JS; Clelland N
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Sep; 88(3):307-13. PubMed ID: 12426502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Simulated oral wear of packable composites.
Clelland NL; Villarroel SC; Knobloch LA; Seghi RR
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):830-7. PubMed ID: 14653301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Packable composites: overview and technical considerations.
Leinfelder KF; Bayne SC; Swift EJ
J Esthet Dent; 1999; 11(5):234-49. PubMed ID: 10825879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials.
Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Braem M; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
J Dent Res; 1997 Apr; 76(4):883-94. PubMed ID: 9126185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid resin-based composites for posterior restorations in permanent teeth: results at 12 months.
Yip KH; Poon BK; Chu FC; Poon EC; Kong FY; Smales RJ
J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Dec; 134(12):1581-9. PubMed ID: 14719754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Properties of a dental resin composite with a spherical inorganic filler.
Lu H; Lee YK; Oguri M; Powers JM
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(6):734-40. PubMed ID: 17153985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical evaluation of two packable posterior composites: a five-year follow-up.
Fagundes TC; Barata TJ; Carvalho CA; Franco EB; van Dijken JW; Navarro MF
J Am Dent Assoc; 2009 Apr; 140(4):447-54. PubMed ID: 19339534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of a packable resin composite, conventional resin composite and amalgam on molar cuspal stiffness.
Molinaro JD; Diefenderfer KE; Strother JM
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):516-24. PubMed ID: 12216572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diametral Tensile Strength, Flexural Strength, and Surface Microhardness of Bioactive Bulk Fill Restorative.
Alrahlah A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Jan; 19(1):13-19. PubMed ID: 29358529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mechanical properties and wear behavior of light-cured packable composite resins.
Manhart J; Kunzelmann KH; Chen HY; Hickel R
Dent Mater; 2000 Jan; 16(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 11203521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hardness and degree of conversion of posterior packable composites.
Knobloch L; Kerby RE; Clelland N; Lee J
Oper Dent; 2004; 29(6):642-9. PubMed ID: 15646219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Physical properties of composites cured with conventional light or argon laser.
Cobb DS; Vargas MA; Rundle T
Am J Dent; 1996 Oct; 9(5):199-202. PubMed ID: 9545904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Investigations on mechanical behaviour of dental composites.
Ilie N; Hickel R
Clin Oral Investig; 2009 Dec; 13(4):427-38. PubMed ID: 19242739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of resin composite materials. Part I: in vitro investigations.
Frankenberger R; García-Godoy F; Lohbauer U; Petschelt A; Krämer N
Am J Dent; 2005 Feb; 18(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 15810477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
