These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11103959)

  • 1. The significance of stem-cement loosening of grit-blasted femoral components.
    Schmalzried TP; Zahiri CA; Woolson ST
    Orthopedics; 2000 Nov; 23(11):1157-64. PubMed ID: 11103959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Thin cement mantle and osteolysis with a precoated stem.
    Kawate K; Ohmura T; Hiyoshi N; Natsume Y; Teranishi T; Tamai S
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Aug; (365):124-9. PubMed ID: 10627696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fatigue fracture of a forged cobalt-chromium-molybdenum femoral component inserted with cement. A report of ten cases.
    Woolson ST; Milbauer JP; Bobyn JD; Yue S; Maloney WJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Dec; 79(12):1842-8. PubMed ID: 9409798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Early aseptic loosening of the CF 30 femoral stem].
    Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Feb; 74(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 17331456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mode of loosening of matt-finished femoral stems in primary total hip replacement.
    Behairy YM; Harris WH
    Saudi Med J; 2002 Oct; 23(10):1187-94. PubMed ID: 12436120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Early failure of precoated femoral components in primary total hip arthroplasty.
    Ong A; Wong KL; Lai M; Garino JP; Steinberg ME
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 May; 84(5):786-92. PubMed ID: 12004022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Frank Stinchfield Award. Influence of cement technique on the interface strength of femoral components.
    Shepard MF; Kabo JM; Lieberman JR
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2000 Dec; (381):26-35. PubMed ID: 11127664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Exeter Universal stem: a minimum ten-year review from an independent centre.
    Hook S; Moulder E; Yates PJ; Burston BJ; Whitley E; Bannister GC
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Dec; 88(12):1584-90. PubMed ID: 17159168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. High failure rate of a modern, proximally roughened, cemented stem for total hip arthroplasty.
    Grose A; González Della Valle A; Bullough P; Lyman S; Tomek I; Pellicci P
    Int Orthop; 2006 Aug; 30(4):243-7. PubMed ID: 16683113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of 16 retrieved proximally cemented femoral stems.
    Jones RE; Willie BM; Hayes H; Bloebaum RD
    J Arthroplasty; 2005 Jan; 20(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 15660065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Total hip arthroplasty with a cemented, polished, collared femoral stem and a cementless acetabular component. A follow-up study at a minimum of ten years.
    Firestone DE; Callaghan JJ; Liu SS; Goetz DD; Sullivan PM; Vittetoe DA; Johnston RC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Jan; 89(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 17200319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hybrid total hip arthroplasty with a precoated offset stem. Four to nine-year results.
    Cannestra VP; Berger RA; Quigley LR; Jacobs JJ; Rosenberg AG; Galante JO
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Sep; 82(9):1291-9. PubMed ID: 11005520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Early loosening of the femoral component at the cement-prosthesis interface after total hip replacement.
    Mohler CG; Callaghan JJ; Collis DK; Johnston RC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1995 Sep; 77(9):1315-22. PubMed ID: 7673279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Primary hybrid total hip arthroplasty with a roughened femoral stem: integrity of the stem-cement interface.
    Meneghini RM; Feinberg JR; Capello WN
    J Arthroplasty; 2003 Apr; 18(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 12728421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of surface roughness and polymethylmethacrylate precoating on the radiographic and clinical results of the Iowa hip prosthesis. A study of patients less than fifty years old.
    Sporer SM; Callaghan JJ; Olejniczak JP; Goetz DD; Johnston RC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Apr; 81(4):481-92. PubMed ID: 10225793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The cement mantle in femoral impaction allografting. A comparison of three systems from four centres.
    Masterson EL; Masri BA; Duncan CP; Rosenberg A; Cabanela M; Gross M
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1997 Nov; 79(6):908-13. PubMed ID: 9393902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of femoral stem surface finish on the apparent static shear strength at the stem-cement interface.
    Zhang H; Brown LT; Blunt LA; Barrans SM
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2008 Jan; 1(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 19627775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surface roughness of debonded straight-tapered stems in cemented THA reduces subsidence but not cement damage.
    Verdonschot N; Huiskes R
    Biomaterials; 1998 Oct; 19(19):1773-9. PubMed ID: 9856588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conus hip prosthesis.
    Wagner H; Wagner M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(4):213-21. PubMed ID: 11706545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interface abrasion between rough surface femoral stems and PMMA cement results in extreme wear volumes--a retrieval study and failure analysis.
    Buchhorn GH; Bersebach P; Stauch T; Schultz W; Köster G
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2015 Jan; 103(1):229-41. PubMed ID: 24820132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.