BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11104393)

  • 1. Statistical perspective on adjusting for center effect in a 2 x 2 crossover design with application to clinical trials.
    Yue LQ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2000 Nov; 10(4):559-71. PubMed ID: 11104393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The analysis of incomplete data in the three-period two-treatment cross-over design for clinical trials.
    Richardson BA; Flack VF
    Stat Med; 1996 Jan; 15(2):127-43. PubMed ID: 8614750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A note on the sample size determination in two-period repeated measurements crossover design with application to clinical trials.
    Yue LQ; Roach P
    J Biopharm Stat; 1998 Nov; 8(4):577-84. PubMed ID: 9855035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of alternative statistical models for crossover studies to demonstrate caffeine adjuvancy in the treatment of tension headache.
    Koch GG; Amara IA; MacMillan J
    J Biopharm Stat; 1994 Nov; 4(3):347-410. PubMed ID: 7881452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comment on interim analyses in crossover trials.
    Grieve AP; Senn S
    Biometrics; 1996 Dec; 52(4):1515-20. PubMed ID: 9019232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stratified tests, stratified slopes, and random effects models for clinical trials with missing data.
    Dawson JD; Han SH
    J Biopharm Stat; 2000 Nov; 10(4):447-55. PubMed ID: 11104386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cluster-crossover design: a method for limiting clusters level effect in community-intervention studies.
    Parienti JJ; Kuss O
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 May; 28(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 17110172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. MMRM vs. LOCF: a comprehensive comparison based on simulation study and 25 NDA datasets.
    Siddiqui O; Hung HM; O'Neill R
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009; 19(2):227-46. PubMed ID: 19212876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating treatment effects in clinical crossover trials.
    Grieve A; Senn S
    J Biopharm Stat; 1998 May; 8(2):191-233; discussion 235-47. PubMed ID: 9598420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An alternative analysis for crossover studies that accounts for between-group disparities in drug response.
    Cleophas TJ
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1997 Nov; 35(11):504-8. PubMed ID: 9401831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of dropouts in a longitudinal study: an application of a repeated ordinal model.
    Lesaffre E; Molenberghs G; Dewulf L
    Stat Med; 1996 Jun; 15(11):1123-41. PubMed ID: 8804143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tests for the analysis of variance of crossover designs with correlated errors.
    Bellavance F; Tardif S; Stephens MA
    Biometrics; 1996 Jun; 52(2):607-12. PubMed ID: 8672705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adaptive covariate adjustment in clinical trials.
    Wang SJ; Hung HM
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(4):605-11. PubMed ID: 16022166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detecting qualitative interactions in clinical trials: an extension of range test.
    Li J; Chan IS
    J Biopharm Stat; 2006; 16(6):831-41. PubMed ID: 17146982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical methods for active extension trials.
    Hu Z; Follmann D
    Stat Med; 2007 May; 26(12):2433-48. PubMed ID: 17066400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of baseline covariates in crossover studies.
    Kenward MG; Roger JH
    Biostatistics; 2010 Jan; 11(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 19915170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sample size calculation for cluster randomized cross-over trials.
    Giraudeau B; Ravaud P; Donner A
    Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(27):5578-85. PubMed ID: 18646266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sample size calculation for the Power Model for dose proportionality studies.
    Sethuraman VS; Leonov S; Squassante L; Mitchell TR; Hale MD
    Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 17323313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tests for inter-subject and total variabilities under crossover designs.
    Lee Y; Shao J; Chow SC; Wang H
    J Biopharm Stat; 2002 Nov; 12(4):503-34. PubMed ID: 12477072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robust procedures for analysing a two-period cross-over design with baseline measurements.
    Tsai KT; Patel HL
    Stat Med; 1996 Jan; 15(2):117-26. PubMed ID: 8614749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.