These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11104529)

  • 1. Extinction-like effects in normals: independence of localization and response selection.
    Pollmann S
    Brain Cogn; 2000 Dec; 44(3):324-41. PubMed ID: 11104529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A pop-out induced extinction-like phenomenon in neurologically intact subjects.
    Pollmann S
    Neuropsychologia; 1996 May; 34(5):413-25. PubMed ID: 9148198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The visual hemifield asymmetry in the spatial blink during singleton search and feature search.
    Burnham BR; Rozell CA; Kasper A; Bianco NE; Delliturri A
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Apr; 75(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 21295901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The relationship of visual extinction to luminance-contrast imbalances between left and right hemifield stimuli.
    Geeraerts S; Michiels K; Lafosse C; Vandenbussche E; Verfaillie K
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(4):542-53. PubMed ID: 15716144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A psychophysical study of visual extinction: ipsilesional distractor interference with contralesional orientation thresholds in visual hemineglect patients.
    Geeraerts S; Lafosse C; Vandenbussche E; Verfaillie K
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(4):530-41. PubMed ID: 15716143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Response selection in visual search: the influence of response compatibility of nontargets.
    Starreveld PA; Theeuwes J; Mortier K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Feb; 30(1):56-78. PubMed ID: 14769068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of gaze orientation on tactilo-kinesthetic performance.
    Chokron S; Bartolomeo P; Colliot P; Auclair L
    Brain Cogn; 2002; 48(2-3):312-7. PubMed ID: 12030458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The bilateral effect: callosal inhibition or intrahemispheric competition?
    Olk B; Hartje W
    Brain Cogn; 2001 Apr; 45(3):317-24. PubMed ID: 11305876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of "blind" distractors on eye movement trajectories in visual hemifield defects.
    Van der Stigchel S; van Zoest W; Theeuwes J; Barton JJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Nov; 20(11):2025-36. PubMed ID: 18416675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The remote distractor effect of saccade latencies in fixation-offset and overlap conditions.
    Honda H
    Vision Res; 2005 Oct; 45(21):2773-9. PubMed ID: 16051305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Selecting and ignoring salient objects within and across dimensions in visual search.
    Schubö A; Müller HJ
    Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 1283():84-101. PubMed ID: 19501066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of search efficiency on surround suppression during visual selection in frontal eye field.
    Schall JD; Sato TR; Thompson KG; Vaughn AA; Juan CH
    J Neurophysiol; 2004 Jun; 91(6):2765-9. PubMed ID: 14749315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does gaze direction really trigger a reflexive shift of spatial attention?
    Friesen CK; Moore C; Kingstone A
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Feb; 57(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 15629217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceptual interactions between bilaterally presented words: what you get is often not what you see.
    Jordan TR; Patching GR
    Neuropsychology; 2003 Oct; 17(4):566-77. PubMed ID: 14599270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An invariant for timing of saccades during visual search.
    van den Berg AV; van Loon EM
    Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(12):1543-55. PubMed ID: 15781072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Eye cannot see it: the interference of subliminal distractors on saccade metrics.
    Van der Stigchel S; Mulckhuyse M; Theeuwes J
    Vision Res; 2009 Jul; 49(16):2104-9. PubMed ID: 19500616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Goal-driven selective attention in patients with right hemisphere lesions: how intact is the ipsilesional field?
    Snow JC; Mattingley JB
    Brain; 2006 Jan; 129(Pt 1):168-81. PubMed ID: 16317021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attentional load and sensory competition in human vision: modulation of fMRI responses by load at fixation during task-irrelevant stimulation in the peripheral visual field.
    Schwartz S; Vuilleumier P; Hutton C; Maravita A; Dolan RJ; Driver J
    Cereb Cortex; 2005 Jun; 15(6):770-86. PubMed ID: 15459076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.
    Peters JC; Goebel R; Roelfsema PR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18702589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inhibition-of-return and oculomotor interference.
    Theeuwes J; Godijn R
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1485-92. PubMed ID: 15066406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.