303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11105009)
1. In vivo force measurements on maxillary implants supporting a fixed prosthesis or an overdenture: a pilot study.
Mericske-Stern R; Venetz E; Fahrländer F; Bürgin W
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Nov; 84(5):535-47. PubMed ID: 11105009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-dimensional force measurements with mandibular overdentures connected to implants by ball-shaped retentive anchors. A clinical study.
Mericske-Stern R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 9509778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 3-D in vivo force measurements on mandibular implants supporting overdentures. A comparative study.
Mericske-Stern R; Piotti M; Sirtes G
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1996 Dec; 7(4):387-96. PubMed ID: 9151607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Human ex vivo bone tissue strains around immediately loaded implants supporting maxillary overdentures.
Akça K; Akkocaoğlu M; Cömert A; Tekdemir I; Cehreli MC
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Dec; 16(6):715-22. PubMed ID: 16307579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On occlusal forces in dentitions with implant-supported fixed cantilever prostheses.
Falk H
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1990; 69():1-40. PubMed ID: 2196708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vivo load measurements on osseointegrated implants supporting fixed or removable prostheses: a comparative pilot study.
Jemt T; Carlsson L; Boss A; Jörneús L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1991; 6(4):413-7. PubMed ID: 1820310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Within-subject comparison of two rigid bar designs connecting two interforaminal implants: patients' satisfaction and prosthetic results.
Mericske-Stern R; Probst D; Fahrländer F; Schellenberg M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):228-37. PubMed ID: 18783424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Immediate function with fixed implant-supported maxillary dentures: a 12-month pilot study.
Tealdo T; Bevilacqua M; Pera F; Menini M; Ravera G; Drago C; Pera P
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 May; 99(5):351-60. PubMed ID: 18456046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retention of maxillary implant overdenture bars of different designs.
Williams BH; Ochiai KT; Hojo S; Nishimura R; Caputo AA
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Dec; 86(6):603-7. PubMed ID: 11753311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
Celik G; Uludag B
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 17499093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Force distribution on implants supporting overdentures: the effect of distal bar extensions. A 3-D in vivo study.
Mericske-Stern R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1997 Apr; 8(2):142-51. PubMed ID: 9758965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of number and distribution of unsplinted maxillary implants on the load transfer in implant-retained maxillary overdentures: an in vitro study.
Damghani S; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Romberg E
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jun; 107(6):358-65. PubMed ID: 22633591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The incomprehensible success of the implant stabilised overdenture in the edentulous mandible: a literature review on transfer of chewing forces to bone surrounding implants.
Chao YL; Meijer HJ; Van Oort RP; Versteegh PA
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1995 Dec; 3(6):255-61. PubMed ID: 8603169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Successful outcome of splinted implants supporting a 'planned' maxillary overdenture: a retrospective evaluation and comparison with fixed full dental prostheses.
Sanna A; Nuytens P; Naert I; Quirynen M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Apr; 20(4):406-13. PubMed ID: 19298295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of stress patterns produced by implant-retained overdentures and implant-retained fixed partial denture.
Mazaro JV; Filho HG; Vedovatto E; Pellizzer EP; Rezende MC; Zavanelli AC
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2153-7. PubMed ID: 22067869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional force measurements on mandibular implants supporting overdentures.
Mericske-Stern R; Geering AH; Burgin WB; Graf H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1992; 7(2):185-94. PubMed ID: 1398835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Photoelastic analysis of the effect of palatal support on various implant-supported overdenture designs.
Ochiai KT; Williams BH; Hojo S; Nishimura R; Caputo AA
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 May; 91(5):421-7. PubMed ID: 15153848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Functional loads on freestanding and connected implants in three-unit mandibular prostheses opposing complete dentures: an in vivo study.
Gunne J; Rangert B; Glantz PO; Svensson A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(3):335-41. PubMed ID: 9197098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of detachment forces of two implant overdenture attachment types: effect of detachment speed.
Jefferies SR; Boston DW; Damrow MP; Galbraith CT
Am J Dent; 2008 Aug; 21(4):244-50. PubMed ID: 18795521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mandibular overdentures: comparative evaluation of prosthodontic maintenance of three different implant systems during the first year of service.
Watson GK; Payne AG; Purton DG; Thomson WM
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(3):259-66. PubMed ID: 12066489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
