These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11108037)

  • 21. Imaging surface and submembranous structures with the atomic force microscope: a study on living cancer cells, fibroblasts and macrophages.
    Braet F; Seynaeve C; De Zanger R; Wisse E
    J Microsc; 1998 Jun; 190(Pt 3):328-38. PubMed ID: 9674158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A one-step procedure to probe the viscoelastic properties of cells by Atomic Force Microscopy.
    Chim YH; Mason LM; Rath N; Olson MF; Tassieri M; Yin H
    Sci Rep; 2018 Sep; 8(1):14462. PubMed ID: 30262873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Finite element modeling of living cells for AFM indentation-based biomechanical characterization.
    Liu Y; Mollaeian K; Ren J
    Micron; 2019 Jan; 116():108-115. PubMed ID: 30366196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of the viscoelastic properties of cells from different kidney cancer phenotypes measured with atomic force microscopy.
    Rebelo LM; de Sousa JS; Mendes Filho J; Radmacher M
    Nanotechnology; 2013 Feb; 24(5):055102. PubMed ID: 23324556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Local viscoelastic properties of live cells investigated using dynamic and quasi-static atomic force microscopy methods.
    Cartagena A; Raman A
    Biophys J; 2014 Mar; 106(5):1033-43. PubMed ID: 24606928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Quantitative analyses of topography and elasticity of living and fixed astrocytes.
    Yamane Y; Shiga H; Haga H; Kawabata K; Abe K; Ito E
    J Electron Microsc (Tokyo); 2000; 49(3):463-71. PubMed ID: 11108036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Viscoelasticity of living cells allows high resolution imaging by tapping mode atomic force microscopy.
    Putman CA; van der Werf KO; de Grooth BG; van Hulst NF; Greve J
    Biophys J; 1994 Oct; 67(4):1749-53. PubMed ID: 7819507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Fast, multi-frequency, and quantitative nanomechanical mapping of live cells using the atomic force microscope.
    Cartagena-Rivera AX; Wang WH; Geahlen RL; Raman A
    Sci Rep; 2015 Jun; 5():11692. PubMed ID: 26118423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Local measurements of viscoelastic parameters of adherent cell surfaces by magnetic bead microrheometry.
    Bausch AR; Ziemann F; Boulbitch AA; Jacobson K; Sackmann E
    Biophys J; 1998 Oct; 75(4):2038-49. PubMed ID: 9746546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mechanical coupling of cytoskeletal elasticity and force generation is crucial for understanding the migrating nature of keloid fibroblasts.
    Harn HI; Wang YK; Hsu CK; Ho YT; Huang YW; Chiu WT; Lin HH; Cheng CM; Tang MJ
    Exp Dermatol; 2015 Aug; 24(8):579-84. PubMed ID: 25877039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Monitoring biomolecular interactions by time-lapse atomic force microscopy.
    Stolz M; Stoffler D; Aebi U; Goldsbury C
    J Struct Biol; 2000 Sep; 131(3):171-80. PubMed ID: 11052889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mapping heterogeneity of cellular mechanics by multi-harmonic atomic force microscopy.
    Efremov YM; Cartagena-Rivera AX; Athamneh AIM; Suter DM; Raman A
    Nat Protoc; 2018 Oct; 13(10):2200-2216. PubMed ID: 30218102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Probing the viscoelastic behavior of cultured airway smooth muscle cells with atomic force microscopy: stiffening induced by contractile agonist.
    Smith BA; Tolloczko B; Martin JG; Grütter P
    Biophys J; 2005 Apr; 88(4):2994-3007. PubMed ID: 15665124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. EGF-stimulated lamellipod extension in adenocarcinoma cells.
    Rotsch C; Jacobson K; Condeelis J; Radmacher M
    Ultramicroscopy; 2001 Jan; 86(1-2):97-106. PubMed ID: 11215638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A thin-layer model for viscoelastic, stress-relaxation testing of cells using atomic force microscopy: do cell properties reflect metastatic potential?
    Darling EM; Zauscher S; Block JA; Guilak F
    Biophys J; 2007 Mar; 92(5):1784-91. PubMed ID: 17158567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Atomic force microscopy imaging of actin cortical cytoskeleton of Xenopus laevis oocyte.
    Santacroce M; Orsini F; Perego C; Lenardi C; Castagna M; Mari SA; Sacchi VF; Poletti G
    J Microsc; 2006 Jul; 223(Pt 1):57-65. PubMed ID: 16872432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Drastic change of local stiffness distribution correlating to cell migration in living fibroblasts.
    Nagayama M; Haga H; Kawabata K
    Cell Motil Cytoskeleton; 2001 Dec; 50(4):173-9. PubMed ID: 11807938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Topography of cell traces studied by atomic force microscopy.
    Zimmermann H; Hagedorn R; Richter E; Fuhr G
    Eur Biophys J; 1999; 28(6):516-25. PubMed ID: 10460345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. High-resolution analysis of neuronal growth cone morphology by comparative atomic force and optical microscopy.
    Grzywa EL; Lee AC; Lee GU; Suter DM
    J Neurobiol; 2006 Dec; 66(14):1529-43. PubMed ID: 17058186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. VASP-dependent regulation of actin cytoskeleton rigidity, cell adhesion, and detachment.
    Galler AB; García Arguinzonis MI; Baumgartner W; Kuhn M; Smolenski A; Simm A; Reinhard M
    Histochem Cell Biol; 2006 May; 125(5):457-74. PubMed ID: 16267652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.