These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11108368)

  • 1. Noise-evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans.
    Maat B; Wit HP; van Dijk P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Nov; 108(5 Pt 1):2272-80. PubMed ID: 11108368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Wiener kernel analysis of a noise-evoked otoacoustic emission.
    van Dijk P; Maat A; Wit HP
    Br J Audiol; 1997 Dec; 31(6):473-7. PubMed ID: 9478290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using the short-time correlation coefficient to compare transient- and derived, noise-evoked otoacoustic emission temporal waveforms.
    Harte JM; Elliott SJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 May; 117(5):2989-98. PubMed ID: 15957769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Near equivalence of human click-evoked and stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions.
    Kalluri R; Shera CA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Apr; 121(4):2097-110. PubMed ID: 17471725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Otoacoustic emissions from ears with spontaneous activity behave differently to those without: Stronger responses to tone bursts as well as to clicks.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Kochanek K; Skarzynski H
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0192930. PubMed ID: 29451905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Temporal suppression and augmentation of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Verhulst S; Harte JM; Dau T
    Hear Res; 2008 Dec; 246(1-2):23-35. PubMed ID: 18926894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Time-frequency decomposition of click evoked otoacoustic emissions in children.
    Mishra SK; Biswal M
    Hear Res; 2016 May; 335():161-178. PubMed ID: 26976693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Frequency-specific information from click evoked otoacoustic emissions in noise-induced hearing loss.
    Tognola G; Grandori F; Avan P; Ravazzani P; Bonfils P
    Audiology; 1999; 38(5):243-50. PubMed ID: 10548370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term stability between click-evoked otoacoustic emissions and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in guinea pigs: A comparison.
    Hoshino M; Ueda H; Nakata S
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1999; 61(4):175-80. PubMed ID: 10450050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Click- and tone-burst-evoked otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired ears.
    Prieve BA; Gorga MP; Neely ST
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 May; 99(5):3077-86. PubMed ID: 8642118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tone burst evoked otoacoustic emissions in different age-groups of schoolchildren.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Pilka E; Skarzynski PH; Olszewski L; Skarzynski H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Aug; 79(8):1310-5. PubMed ID: 26092548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. "Linear" and "derived" otoacoustic emissions in newborns: a comparative study.
    Tognola G; Ravazzani P; Molini E; Ricci G; Alunni N; Parazzini M; Grandori F
    Ear Hear; 2001 Jun; 22(3):182-90. PubMed ID: 11409854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Repeatability of click-evoked otoacoustic emission-based medial olivocochlear efferent assay.
    Mishra SK; Lutman ME
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):789-98. PubMed ID: 23739244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digital subtraction method for transient evoked otoacoustic emission recording with ipsilateral noise suppression: an application to stimulus artifact reduction.
    Arslan RB; Ozdamar O; Ulgen Y
    Audiology; 2001; 40(2):55-62. PubMed ID: 11409763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dissecting the frog inner ear with Gaussian noise. I. Application of high-order Wiener-kernel analysis.
    van Dijk P; Wit HP; Segenhout JM
    Hear Res; 1997 Dec; 114(1-2):229-42. PubMed ID: 9447936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tone-burst and click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in subjects with hearing loss above 0.25, 0.5, and 1 kHz.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Kochanek K; Trzaskowski B; Pilka E; Skarzynski PH; Skarzynski H
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(6):757-67. PubMed ID: 22710662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cochlear maturation and otoacoustic emissions in preterm infants: a time-frequency approach.
    Tognola G; Parazzini M; de Jager P; Brienesse P; Ravazzani P; Grandori F
    Hear Res; 2005 Jan; 199(1-2):71-80. PubMed ID: 15574301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nonlinear properties of otoacoustic emissions in normal and impaired hearing.
    Thornton AR; Lineton B; Baker VJ; Slaven A
    Hear Res; 2006 Sep; 219(1-2):56-65. PubMed ID: 16839724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transducer hysteresis contributes to "stimulus artifact" in the measurement of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (L).
    Kapadia S; Lutman ME; Palmer AR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug; 118(2):620-2. PubMed ID: 16158619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nonlinear temporal interactions in click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. II. Experimental data.
    Kapadia S; Lutman ME
    Hear Res; 2000 Aug; 146(1-2):101-20. PubMed ID: 10913888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.