These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11108473)

  • 1. A computational method for NMR-constrained protein threading.
    Xu Y; Xu D; Crawford OH; Einstein JR
    J Comput Biol; 2000; 7(3-4):449-67. PubMed ID: 11108473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. NMR data-driven structure determination using NMR-I-TASSER in the CASD-NMR experiment.
    Jang R; Wang Y; Xue Z; Zhang Y
    J Biomol NMR; 2015 Aug; 62(4):511-25. PubMed ID: 25737244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing atomistic simulation data with the NMR experiment: how much can NOEs actually tell us?
    Zagrovic B; van Gunsteren WF
    Proteins; 2006 Apr; 63(1):210-8. PubMed ID: 16425239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. CABS-NMR--De novo tool for rapid global fold determination from chemical shifts, residual dipolar couplings and sparse methyl-methyl NOEs.
    Latek D; Kolinski A
    J Comput Chem; 2011 Feb; 32(3):536-44. PubMed ID: 20806263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automating unambiguous NOE data usage in NVR for NMR protein structure-based assignments.
    Akhmedov M; Çatay B; Apaydın MS
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2015 Dec; 13(6):1550020. PubMed ID: 26260854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Completely automated, highly error-tolerant macromolecular structure determination from multidimensional nuclear overhauser enhancement spectra and chemical shift assignments.
    Kuszewski J; Schwieters CD; Garrett DS; Byrd RA; Tjandra N; Clore GM
    J Am Chem Soc; 2004 May; 126(20):6258-73. PubMed ID: 15149223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A polynomial-time nuclear vector replacement algorithm for automated NMR resonance assignments.
    Langmead CJ; Yan A; Lilien R; Wang L; Donald BR
    J Comput Biol; 2004; 11(2-3):277-98. PubMed ID: 15285893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving fold recognition of protein threading by experimental distance constraints.
    Albrecht M; Hanisch D; Zimmer R; Lengauer T
    In Silico Biol; 2002; 2(3):325-37. PubMed ID: 12542417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rapid and reliable protein structure determination via chemical shift threading.
    Hafsa NE; Berjanskii MV; Arndt D; Wishart DS
    J Biomol NMR; 2018 Jan; 70(1):33-51. PubMed ID: 29196969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Protein fold recognition by prediction-based threading.
    Rost B; Schneider R; Sander C
    J Mol Biol; 1997 Jul; 270(3):471-80. PubMed ID: 9237912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Structure determination of a new protein from backbone-centered NMR data and NMR-assisted structure prediction.
    Mayer KL; Qu Y; Bansal S; LeBlond PD; Jenney FE; Brereton PS; Adams MW; Xu Y; Prestegard JH
    Proteins; 2006 Nov; 65(2):480-9. PubMed ID: 16927360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Protein structure prediction constrained by solution X-ray scattering data and structural homology identification.
    Zheng W; Doniach S
    J Mol Biol; 2002 Feb; 316(1):173-87. PubMed ID: 11829511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The fumarate sensor DcuS: progress in rapid protein fold elucidation by combining protein structure prediction methods with NMR spectroscopy.
    Meiler J; Baker D
    J Magn Reson; 2005 Apr; 173(2):310-6. PubMed ID: 15780923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exploring the limits of precision and accuracy of protein structures determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy.
    Clore GM; Robien MA; Gronenborn AM
    J Mol Biol; 1993 May; 231(1):82-102. PubMed ID: 8496968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The NOESY jigsaw: automated protein secondary structure and main-chain assignment from sparse, unassigned NMR data.
    Bailey-Kellogg C; Widge A; Kelley JJ; Berardi MJ; Bushweller JH; Donald BR
    J Comput Biol; 2000; 7(3-4):537-58. PubMed ID: 11108478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Protein structure prediction: combining de novo modeling with sparse experimental data.
    Latek D; Ekonomiuk D; Kolinski A
    J Comput Chem; 2007 Jul; 28(10):1668-76. PubMed ID: 17342709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Protein threading using PROSPECT: design and evaluation.
    Xu Y; Xu D
    Proteins; 2000 Aug; 40(3):343-54. PubMed ID: 10861926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The solution structure of bovine ferricytochrome b5 determined using heteronuclear NMR methods.
    Muskett FW; Kelly GP; Whitford D
    J Mol Biol; 1996 Apr; 258(1):172-89. PubMed ID: 8613986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A branch and bound algorithm for protein structure refinement from sparse NMR data sets.
    Standley DM; Eyrich VA; Felts AK; Friesner RA; McDermott AE
    J Mol Biol; 1999 Jan; 285(4):1691-710. PubMed ID: 9917406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction of protein loop geometries in solution.
    Rapp CS; Strauss T; Nederveen A; Fuentes G
    Proteins; 2007 Oct; 69(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 17588228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.