These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11109703)

  • 1. Testing treatment effects in repeated measures designs: trimmed means and bootstrapping.
    Keselman HJ; Kowalchuk RK; Algina J; Lix LM; Wilcox RR
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2000 Nov; 53 ( Pt 2)():175-91. PubMed ID: 11109703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Repeated Measures Interaction Test with Aligned Ranks.
    Kowalchuk RK; Keselman HJ; Algina J
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2003 Oct; 38(4):433-61. PubMed ID: 26777442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analyzing Multivariate Repeated Measures Designs: A Comparison of Two Approximate Degrees of Freedom Procedures.
    Lix LM; Algina J; Keselman HJ
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2003 Oct; 38(4):403-31. PubMed ID: 26777441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of non-normality on test statistics for one-way independent groups designs.
    Cribbie RA; Fiksenbaum L; Keselman HJ; Wilcox RR
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 Feb; 65(1):56-73. PubMed ID: 21426313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robust step-down tests for multivariate independent group designs.
    Lix LM; Fouladi RT
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 Nov; 60(Pt 2):245-65. PubMed ID: 17971269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An examination of the robustness of the empirical Bayes and other approaches for testing main and interaction effects in repeated measures designs.
    Keselman HJ; Kowalchuk RK; Boik RJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2000 May; 53 ( Pt 1)():51-67. PubMed ID: 10895522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Testing Repeated Measures Hypotheses when Covariance Matrices are Heterogeneous: Revisiting the Robustness of the Welch-James Test.
    Algina J; Keselman HJ
    Multivariate Behav Res; 1997 Jul; 32(3):255-74. PubMed ID: 26761611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robust tests for multivariate factorial designs under heteroscedasticity.
    Vallejo G; Ato M
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Jun; 44(2):471-89. PubMed ID: 21994181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A robust approach for analyzing unbalanced factorial designs with fixed levels.
    Vallejo G; Ato M; Fernández MP
    Behav Res Methods; 2010 May; 42(2):607-17. PubMed ID: 20479192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A generally robust approach for testing hypotheses and setting confidence intervals for effect sizes.
    Keselman HJ; Algina J; Lix LM; Wilcox RR; Deering KN
    Psychol Methods; 2008 Jun; 13(2):110-29. PubMed ID: 18557681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Power comparison of new tests to analyze repeated measures data].
    Livacic-Rojas P; Vallejo G; Fernández P
    Psicothema; 2007 Nov; 19(4):673-8. PubMed ID: 17959125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robust tests for the multivariate Behrens-Fisher problem.
    Lix LM; Keselman HJ; Hinds AM
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2005 Feb; 77(2):129-39. PubMed ID: 15652635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modified Brown-Forsythe Procedure for Testing Interaction Effects in Split-Plot Designs.
    Vallejo G; Ato M
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2006 Dec; 41(4):549-78. PubMed ID: 26794918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing measures of the 'typical' score across treatment groups.
    Othman AR; Keselman HJ; Padmanabhan AR; Wilcox RR; Fradette K
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2004 Nov; 57(Pt 2):215-34. PubMed ID: 15511305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using Johnson's transformation and robust estimators with heteroscedastic test statistics: an examination of the effects of non-normality and heterogeneity in the non-orthogonal two-way ANOVA design.
    Luh WM; Guo JH
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2001 May; 54(Pt 1):79-94. PubMed ID: 11393903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A generally robust approach to hypothesis testing in independent and correlated groups designs.
    Keselman HJ; Wilcox RR; Lix LM
    Psychophysiology; 2003 Jul; 40(4):586-96. PubMed ID: 14570166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparative study of robust tests for spread: asymmetric trimming strategies.
    Keselman HJ; Wilcox RR; Algina J; Othman AR; Fradette K
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 Nov; 61(Pt 2):235-53. PubMed ID: 18433520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adaptive robust estimation and testing.
    Keselman HJ; Wilcox RR; Lix LM; Algina J; Fradette K
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 Nov; 60(Pt 2):267-93. PubMed ID: 17971270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Violation of the Sphericity Assumption and Its Effect on Type-I Error Rates in Repeated Measures ANOVA and Multi-Level Linear Models (MLM).
    Haverkamp N; Beauducel A
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1841. PubMed ID: 29089917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison via simulation of least squares Lehmann-Scheffé estimators of two variances and heritability with those of restricted maximum likelihood.
    Slanger WD; Carlson JK
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Aug; 81(8):1950-8. PubMed ID: 12926777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.