These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11109865)

  • 1. Vertical versus horizontal spatial compatibility: right-left prevalence with bimanual responses.
    Vu KP; Proctor RW; Pick DF
    Psychol Res; 2000; 64(1):25-40. PubMed ID: 11109865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. No prevalence of right-left over top-bottom spatial codes.
    Hommel B
    Percept Psychophys; 1996 Jan; 58(1):102-10. PubMed ID: 8668511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The prevalence effect in two-dimensional stimulus-response compatibility is a function of the relative salience of the dimensions.
    Vu KP; Proctor RW
    Percept Psychophys; 2002 Jul; 64(5):815-28. PubMed ID: 12201340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determinants of right-left and top-bottom prevalence for two-dimensional spatial compatibility.
    Vu KP; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Aug; 27(4):813-28. PubMed ID: 11518145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Right-left prevalence effect with horizontal and vertical effectors.
    Rubichi S; Nicoletti R; Pelosi A; Umiltà C
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Feb; 66(2):255-63. PubMed ID: 15129747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of auditory and audiovisual stimuli on the right-left prevalence effect.
    Vu KP; Minakata K; Ngo MK
    Psychol Res; 2014; 78(3):400-10. PubMed ID: 24096315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of short incompatible practice on the Simon effect: transfer along the vertical dimension and across vertical and horizontal dimensions.
    Conde EF; Fraga-Filho RS; Lameira AP; Mograbi DC; Riggio L; Gawryszewski LG
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Nov; 233(11):3313-21. PubMed ID: 26265123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Right-left prevalence with task-irrelevant spatial codes.
    Rubichi S; Nicoletti R; Umiltà C
    Psychol Res; 2005 Jan; 69(3):167-78. PubMed ID: 15597182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Control-display alignment determines the prevalent compatibility effect in two-dimensional stimulus-response tasks.
    Lee S; Miles JD; Vu KP
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Apr; 23(2):571-8. PubMed ID: 26169949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preparation for horizontal or vertical dimensions affects the right-left prevalence effect.
    Nishimura A; Yokosawa K
    Percept Psychophys; 2007 Oct; 69(7):1242-52. PubMed ID: 18038960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of precuing horizontal and vertical dimensions on right-left prevalence.
    Proctor RW; Koch I; Vu KP
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jun; 34(4):949-58. PubMed ID: 17063924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. No overall right-left prevalence for horizontal and vertical Simon effects.
    Vu KP; Pellicano A; Proctor RW
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Jul; 67(5):929-38. PubMed ID: 16334063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stimulus-set location does not affect orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility.
    Cho YS; Proctor RW
    Psychol Res; 2004 Dec; 69(1-2):106-14. PubMed ID: 14634811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attentional focussing and spatial stimulus-response compatibility.
    Stoffer TH
    Psychol Res; 1991; 53(2):127-35. PubMed ID: 1946872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of response eccentricity and relative position on orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility with joystick and keypress responses.
    Proctor RW; Cho YS
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Feb; 56(2):309-27. PubMed ID: 12613566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of horizontal and vertical Luminance SNARC compatibility on affective judgments.
    Gusmão B; Löffler CS; Topolinski S
    Cogn Emot; 2022 Dec; 36(8):1522-1530. PubMed ID: 36263873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects emerge even when the stimulus position is task irrelevant.
    Nishimura A; Yokosawa K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Jun; 59(6):1021-32. PubMed ID: 16885141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatial S-R compatibility: positional instruction vs. compatibility instruction.
    Heister G; Schroeder-Heister P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1994 Feb; 85(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 8165921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influences of multiple spatial stimulus and response codes on orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility.
    Cho YS; Proctor RW
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Aug; 66(6):1003-17. PubMed ID: 15675647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mixing compatible and incompatible mappings: elimination, reduction, and enhancement of spatial compatibility effects.
    Vu KP; Proctor RW
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Apr; 57(3):539-56. PubMed ID: 15204140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.