These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11109865)

  • 21. Spatial interferences in mental arithmetic: evidence from the motion-arithmetic compatibility effect.
    Wiemers M; Bekkering H; Lindemann O
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(8):1557-70. PubMed ID: 24483946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Does right-left prevalence occur for the Simon effect?
    Proctor RW; Vu KP; Nicoletti R
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Nov; 65(8):1318-29. PubMed ID: 14710965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Brain-behavior relationships: evidence from practice effects in spatial stimulus-response compatibility.
    Iacoboni M; Woods RP; Mazziotta JC
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Jul; 76(1):321-31. PubMed ID: 8836228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Influences on the Simon effect of prior practice with spatially incompatible mappings: transfer within and between horizontal and vertical dimensions.
    Vu KP
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Sep; 35(6):1463-71. PubMed ID: 18035642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Lower-right and upper-left biases within upper and lower visual fields in a circular array task.
    Szelest I; Elias LJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 2014 Dec; 119(3):861-79. PubMed ID: 25375827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Horizontal and vertical pseudoneglect in peri- and extrapersonal space.
    Heber IA; Siebertz S; Wolter M; Kuhlen T; Fimm B
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Aug; 73(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 20537456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Neural mechanisms of spatial stimulus-response compatibility: the effect of crossed-hand position.
    Matsumoto E; Misaki M; Miyauchi S
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Sep; 158(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 15029467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Stimulus-response compatibility in representational space.
    Bächtold D; Baumüller M; Brugger P
    Neuropsychologia; 1998 Aug; 36(8):731-5. PubMed ID: 9751438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Multiple perceptual distortions and their modulation in leftsided visual neglect.
    Kerkhoff G
    Neuropsychologia; 2000; 38(7):1073-86. PubMed ID: 10775717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Spatial stimulus-response compatibility: presentation of stimuli within one visual hemifield].
    Nicoletti R; Anzola GP; Rizzolatti G; Umiltà C
    Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper; 1980 Jul; 56(13):1426-31. PubMed ID: 7448039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Transfer of magnitude and spatial mappings to the SNARC effect for parity judgments.
    Bae GY; Choi JM; Cho YS; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1506-21. PubMed ID: 19857020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Disentangling sensorimotor and cognitive cardioafferent effects: A cardiac-cycle-time study on spatial stimulus-response compatibility.
    Larra MF; Finke JB; Wascher E; Schächinger H
    Sci Rep; 2020 Mar; 10(1):4059. PubMed ID: 32132629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Separating responses based on demand characteristics and phenomenological-spatial associations.
    Hansen S; Gonzalez DA; Lyons JL
    Percept Mot Skills; 2013 Oct; 117(2):578-96. PubMed ID: 24611258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Face inversion disrupts the perception of vertical relations between features in the right human occipito-temporal cortex.
    Goffaux V; Rossion B; Sorger B; Schiltz C; Goebel R
    J Neuropsychol; 2009 Mar; 3(Pt 1):45-67. PubMed ID: 19338716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Experimental disentangling of spatial-compatibility and interhemispheric-relay effects in simple reaction time (Poffenberger paradigm).
    Braun CM; Larocque C; Achim A
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Aug; 157(4):442-56. PubMed ID: 15292975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Response-response compatibility during bimanual movements: evidence for the conceptual coding of action.
    Hazeltine E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Aug; 12(4):682-8. PubMed ID: 16447382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Spatial compatibility effects with unimanual and bimanual wheel-rotation responses: an homage to guiard (1983).
    Murchison NM; Proctor RW
    J Mot Behav; 2013; 45(5):441-54. PubMed ID: 23972054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The Simon effect of spatial words in eye movements: comparison of vertical and horizontal effects and of eye and finger responses.
    Khalid S; Ansorge U
    Vision Res; 2013 Jun; 86():6-14. PubMed ID: 23597583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Exploring handedness asymmetries in the Simon effect.
    Seibold JC; Chen J; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Feb; 78(2):437-51. PubMed ID: 26676871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Is automatic imitation a specialized form of stimulus-response compatibility? Dissociating imitative and spatial compatibilities.
    Boyer TW; Longo MR; Bertenthal BI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Mar; 139(3):440-8. PubMed ID: 22326448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.