These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1111014)
1. The evaluation of high-speed screen-film combinations in angiography. Ovitt TW; Moore R; Armplatz K Radiology; 1975 Feb; 114(2):449-52. PubMed ID: 1111014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospects for x-ray exposure reduction using rare earth intensifying screens. Wagner RF; Weaver KE Radiology; 1976 Jan; 118(1):183-8. PubMed ID: 1244656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The application of fast screen-film systems to excretory urography. Stables DP; Rossi RP; Caruthers SB; Anderson N AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1977 Apr; 128(4):617-9. PubMed ID: 403791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Screen/film system speed: its dependence on x-ray energy. Vyborny CJ; Metz CE; Doi K; Rossmann K Radiology; 1977 Dec; 125(3):811-6. PubMed ID: 928715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The importance of high-speed screen-filmcombinations for coronary angiography (author's transl)]. Bardach G Rontgenblatter; 1977 Jun; 30(6):320-4. PubMed ID: 897517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rare-earth and calcium tungstate intensifying screens, a comparative study of relative speed, radiation doses and resolving power. de Carvalho A; Jørgensen J Rofo; 1978 Mar; 128(3):358-63. PubMed ID: 147838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparative evaluation of rare-earth screen-film systems. System speed, contrast, sensitometry, RMS noise, square-wave response function, and contrast-dose-detail analysis. Fearon T; Vucich J; Hoe J; McSweeney WJ; Potter BM Invest Radiol; 1986 Aug; 21(8):654-62. PubMed ID: 3744739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical comparison of high-speed rare-earth screen and par-speed screen for diagnostic efficacy and radiation dosage. Robinson T; Becker JA; Olson AP Radiology; 1982 Oct; 145(1):214-6. PubMed ID: 6821592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. X-ray-intensifying screen technology for improving veterinary field radiography. Pharr JW; Fretz PB J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1979 Nov; 175(10):1103-5. PubMed ID: 521355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparison of screens and screen-film-systems (author's transl)]. Maurer HJ; Goos F Radiologe; 1979 Jun; 19(6):239-42. PubMed ID: 461776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Experimental study of intensifying screens used in diagnostic radiography (author's transl)]. de Moras Y; Lucas P; Fauduet A; Pelgas MF; Serrurot M; Bausmayer J J Radiol Electrol Med Nucl; 1978 Mar; 59(3):213-21. PubMed ID: 650634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of screen/film combinations on diagnostic certainty: Hi-Plus/RPL versus Lanex/Ortho G in excretory urography. Thornbury JR; Fryback DG; Patterson FE; Chiavarini RL AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 Jan; 130(1):83-7. PubMed ID: 413423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [A new rare earth intensifying screen: lanthanum oxybromide (Quanta III - Dupont): relative speed, resolution and image quality (author's transl)]. Bergamini C; Laudicina L; Marengo M; Pavlica P; Viglietta G; Zanini M Radiol Med; 1980 Oct; 66(10):699-704. PubMed ID: 7221029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Examinations of rare-earth film-screen-systems for image detectors in mammography (author's transl)]. Weberling R Rontgenblatter; 1979 Mar; 32(3):109-16. PubMed ID: 432483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]