These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
25. Effect of crossover exposure on radiographic image quality of screen-film systems. Doi K; Loo LN; Anderson TM; Frank PH Radiology; 1981 Jun; 139(3):707-14. PubMed ID: 7232738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparative evaluation of several rare-earth film-screen systems. Braun M; Wilson BC Radiology; 1982 Sep; 144(4):915-9. PubMed ID: 7111746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The use of high-speed film/screen combinations to improve diagnostic image quality. LePage JR; Trefler M Radiology; 1983 Apr; 147(1):265-7. PubMed ID: 6828744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [X-ray film evaluation with a new equidensitometric film (author's transl)]. Müllenberg W Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed; 1974 Oct; 121(4):512-7. PubMed ID: 4373351 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Radiologic exchange. Patient dose can be reduced by using 105 mm photofluoro spot films instead of the screen-film cassette spot radiographs. Stears JG; Gray JE; Frank ED Radiol Technol; 1989; 60(6):515-6. PubMed ID: 2762541 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of mammography unit and rare earth screens for high resolution hand radiography. Desautels JE; Radomsky JW; Erickson LM J Can Assoc Radiol; 1980 Sep; 31(3):185-6. PubMed ID: 7419547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Selection of optimal screen-film combination for use in the neonatal intensive care unit. Smith WL; Franken EA; Frangi SM; Windsor C AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Dec; 139(6):1051-3. PubMed ID: 6756100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents. Measures of screen-film performance. Haus AG Radiographics; 1996 Sep; 16(5):1165-81. PubMed ID: 8888396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Speed S sensitivity of film-screen systems and mode of action of different automatic illumination in general practice. I: Film-screen systems]. Blendl C; Kondmann M; Müller J Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Sep; 7(5):288-94. PubMed ID: 9410006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [X-ray phase imaging using a X-ray tube with a small focal spot -improvement of image quality in mammography-]. Honda C; Ohara H; Ishisaka A; Shimada F; Endo T Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 12766293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Optimisation of patient radiation protection in conventional X-ray imaging procedures using film reject analysis: a demonstration of the importance of rare earth screen-film systems. Inkoom S; Schandorf C; Fletcher JJ Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Sep; 136(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 19737839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Analysis of the detective quantum efficiency of a radiographic screen-film combination. Bunch PC; Huff KE; Van Metter R J Opt Soc Am A; 1987 May; 4(5):902-9. PubMed ID: 3598743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A method to absorb scattered radiation without attenuation of the primary beam. Moore R; Korbuly D; Amplatz K Radiology; 1976 Sep; 120(3):713-7. PubMed ID: 948608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The dependence of radiographic mottle on beam quality. Barnes GT AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1976 Nov; 127(5):819-24. PubMed ID: 973671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A comparison of the imaging characteristics of the new Kodak Hyper Speed G film with the current T-MAT G/RA film and the CR 9000 system. Monnin P; Gutierrez D; Bulling S; Lepori D; Verdun FR Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(19):4541-52. PubMed ID: 16177488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]