116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1111144)
1. The joint responsibility for research development and delivery of health care.
Weinberger C
Surg Neurol; 1975 Jan; 3(1):4. PubMed ID: 1111144
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The role and responsibility of a state in promoting good health for its people. Financing of health care: comment.
McNerney WJ
Inquiry; 1973 Mar; 10():Suppl 1:6-7. PubMed ID: 4267158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Federal influence in the health care system.
Michael JM; Parsons FL
J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1970 Jul; 69(11):1095-103. PubMed ID: 5202391
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Provisions of the National Health Planning and Resources Development Act.
MacStravic RE
Hosp Prog; 1975 Apr; 56(4):48-50/80. PubMed ID: 1123232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Development and implementation of health care technology: the U. S. experience.
Gross PF
Inquiry; 1972 Jun; 9(2):34-48. PubMed ID: 4262708
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Schaeffer: HCFA bureaucracy can work. Interview by William Boyles.
Schaeffer L
Health Care Week; 1978 Dec; 2(23):13. PubMed ID: 10239285
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Health care policy issues in the 1970s.
Wilson VE; Myers BA
Health Serv Rep; 1972 Dec; 87(10):879-85. PubMed ID: 4346597
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Home health agencies: mismatch between services and patients' needs.
Reif L
Home Health Rev; 1978; 1(2):9-13. PubMed ID: 10240528
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Federal health services grants.
Zwick DI
Health Serv Rep; 1973 Jan; 88(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 4346941
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. IV. Government responsibility for community health (city, county, state, federal).
Proc Inst Med Chic; 1971 May; 28(9):378-88. PubMed ID: 5088114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Organization and administration for health affairs. Comment: state versus federal health policy.
Thompson JD
Inquiry; 1973 Mar; 10():Suppl 1:78-83. PubMed ID: 4267160
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A blueprint for change--part two.
Snoke AW; Snoke PS
Hospitals; 1974 Jul; 48(14):36-40. PubMed ID: 4837754
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Touting prevention, Clinton budget seeks increases for family planning.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1994 Feb; (4):1-2. PubMed ID: 12345595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Washington sees changes on way in U.S. health care. But does change necessitate revolution?
Korcok M; Linton O
Can Med Assoc J; 1973 Apr; 108(7):905-9. PubMed ID: 4574973
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Government, public and voluntary agencies in health services.
Roemer MI
Isr J Med Sci; 1974; 10(1):18-31. PubMed ID: 4825419
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Rehabilitation services: public vs the private sector.
Lorenz JR
Rehabil Lit; 1973 Sep; 34(9):258-66 passim. PubMed ID: 4590400
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Editorial: National health policy.
Cooper JA
J Med Educ; 1973 Dec; 48(12):1159-60. PubMed ID: 4752446
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Perspectives on policy research.
Eichhorn RL; Wysong JA
Health Serv Res; 1972; 7(4):272-5. PubMed ID: 4347098
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomedical research versus health care delivery: the President's national health strategy.
Fudenberg HH; Sanford JP
Fed Proc; 1971; 30(4):1373-5. PubMed ID: 5109121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Government and health.
Yarmolinsky A
Mt Sinai J Med; 1973; 40(4):592-9. PubMed ID: 4578885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
