126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11112187)
1. The Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage in acetabular revision surgery: a mean follow-up of 12 years.
Wachtl SW; Jung M; Jakob RP; Gautier E
J Arthroplasty; 2000 Dec; 15(8):959-63. PubMed ID: 11112187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage for acetabular revision: a 5- to 13-year follow-up study.
Coscujuela-Mañá A; Angles F; Tramunt C; Casanova X
Hip Int; 2010; 20 Suppl 7():S112-8. PubMed ID: 20512782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of the Burch-Schneider cage and structural allografts in complex acetabular deficiency: 3- to 10-year follow up.
Hsu CC; Hsu CH; Yen SH; Wang JW
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2015 Oct; 31(10):540-7. PubMed ID: 26520694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reconstruction of severe acetabular bone-deficiency: the Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty.
Pieringer H; Auersperg V; Böhler N
J Arthroplasty; 2006 Jun; 21(4):489-96. PubMed ID: 16781399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The modern Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage for the treatment of acetabular defects: is it still an option? A systematic review.
Malahias MA; Sarantis M; Gkiatas I; Jang SJ; Gu A; Thorey F; Alexiades MM; Nikolaou VS
Hip Int; 2023 Jul; 33(4):705-715. PubMed ID: 35658595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Reconstruction of severe acetabular bone defects using Burch-Schneider cage].
Gallo J; Rozkydal Z; Sklenský M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2006 Jun; 73(3):157-63. PubMed ID: 16846560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Total hip arthroplasty revision in elderly people with cement and Burch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage.
Gaiani L; Bertelli R; Palmonari M; Vicenzi G
Chir Organi Mov; 2009 May; 93(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 19711157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage in revision hip arthroplasty with acetabular bone defect.
Blacha J; Gagała J
Ortop Traumatol Rehabil; 2004 Oct; 6(5):631-7. PubMed ID: 17618213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Primary total hip replacement using Burch-Schneider cages for acetabular fractures.
Liaw F; Govilkar S; Banks D; Kankanalu P; Youssef B; Lim J
Hip Int; 2022 May; 32(3):401-406. PubMed ID: 32905712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A minimum of 10-year follow-up of the Burch-Schneider cage and bulk allografts for the revision of pelvic discontinuity.
Regis D; Sandri A; Bonetti I; Bortolami O; Bartolozzi P
J Arthroplasty; 2012 Jun; 27(6):1057-63.e1. PubMed ID: 22397857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The midterm and long-term effects of acetabular roof ring and Burch-Schneider anti-protusio cages in acetabular revisions for patients with acetabular bone deficiency.
Demir MT; Pirinççi Y; Salih M; Erdoğan F; Güney N
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2015; 49(6):597-605. PubMed ID: 26511685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intermediate-term results with a modified antiprotrusio cage in acetabular revision surgery.
Crockarell JR
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2009 Sep; 38(9):E144-8. PubMed ID: 19911104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Burch-Schneider cage: 9-year survival in Paprosky type 3 acetabular defects. Clinical and radiological follow-up.
Jones L; Grammatopoulos G; Singer G
Hip Int; 2012; 22(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 22383324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Survival Analysis of Allografting and Antiprotrusio Cage in Treating Massive Acetabular Bone Defects.
Chang CY; Wu CT; Numan H; Kuo FC; Wang JW; Lee MS
J Arthroplasty; 2021 Feb; 36(2):682-687. PubMed ID: 32943318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Revision of type III and type IVB acetabular defects with Burch-Schneider anti-Protrusio cages.
Ilyas I; Alrumaih HA; Kashif S; Rabbani SA; Faqihi AH
J Arthroplasty; 2015 Feb; 30(2):259-64. PubMed ID: 25280395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The use of a non-biological, bridging, antiprotrusio cage in complex revision hip arthroplasty and periacetabular reconstructive oncologic surgery. Is still today a valid option?: A mid/long-term survival and complications' analysis.
Innocenti M; Muratori F; Mazzei G; Guido D; Frenos F; Lucenteforte E; Capanna R; Campanacci DA
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2022 Apr; 142(4):681-690. PubMed ID: 34028571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Effectiveness of the Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage for acetabular bone deficiency: five to twenty-one years' follow-up.
Symeonides PP; Petsatodes GE; Pournaras JD; Kapetanos GA; Christodoulou AG; Marougiannis DJ
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Feb; 24(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 18534474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage: medium follow-up results.
Lamo-Espinosa J; Duart Clemente J; Díaz-Rada P; Pons-Villanueva J; Valentí-Nín JR
Musculoskelet Surg; 2013 Apr; 97(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 23263834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Acetabular reconstruction with the Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage and bulk allografts: minimum 10-year follow-up results.
Regis D; Sandri A; Bonetti I
Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():194076. PubMed ID: 24967339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Bürch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage in revision total hip arthroplasty: indications, principles and long-term results.
Gill TJ; Sledge JB; Müller ME
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1998 Nov; 80(6):946-53. PubMed ID: 9853483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
