126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11112187)
21. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using an Acetabular Reinforcement Ring With a Hook: A Precise Follow-Up, at Average 11.4 Years, of a Previous Report.
Park KS; Seon JK; Lee KB; Kim SK; Chan CK; Yoon TR
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Feb; 32(2):503-509. PubMed ID: 27546473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Cup-cage reconstruction for severe acetabular bone loss and pelvic discontinuity: Mid-term Results of a Consecutive Series of 35 Cases.
Hipfl C; Janz V; Löchel J; Perka C; Wassilew GI
Bone Joint J; 2018 Nov; 100-B(11):1442-1448. PubMed ID: 30418066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Acetabular revision with allograft bone. 103 revisions with 3 reconstruction alternatives, followed for 0.3-13 years.
Böhm P; Banzhaf S
Acta Orthop Scand; 1999 Jun; 70(3):240-9. PubMed ID: 10429598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Re-revision of failed revision Total Hip Arthroplasty acetabular components.
Lim SJ; Lee YS; Lim BH; Park YS
Acta Orthop Belg; 2014 Sep; 80(3):357-64. PubMed ID: 26280609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A well-fixed femoral stem facing a failed acetabular component: to exchange or not? A 5- to 15-year follow-up study.
de Thomasson E; Conso C; Mazel C
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2012 Feb; 98(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 22245150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Use of porous tantalum components in Paprosky two and three acetabular revision. A minimum five-year follow-up of fifty one hips.
Flecher X; Appy B; Parratte S; Ollivier M; Argenson JN
Int Orthop; 2017 May; 41(5):911-916. PubMed ID: 27766385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. High placement of an acetabular component inserted without cement in a revision total hip arthroplasty. Results after a mean of ten years.
Dearborn JT; Harris WH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Apr; 81(4):469-80. PubMed ID: 10225792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Fixation, survival, and dislocation of jumbo acetabular components in revision hip arthroplasty.
Lachiewicz PF; Soileau ES
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Mar; 95(6):543-8. PubMed ID: 23515989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. High Survivorship With Cementless Stems and Cortical Strut Allografts for Large Femoral Bone Defects in Revision THA.
Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS; Rastogi D
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Sep; 473(9):2990-3000. PubMed ID: 26013152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Allogeneic cancellous bone graft and a Burch-Schneider ring for acetabular reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty.
Winter E; Piert M; Volkmann R; Maurer F; Eingartner C; Weise K; Weller S
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2001 Jun; 83(6):862-7. PubMed ID: 11407794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Outcome of 4 Surgical Treatments for Wear and Osteolysis of Cementless Acetabular Components.
Narkbunnam R; Amanatullah DF; Electricwala AJ; Huddleston JI; Maloney WJ; Goodman SB
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Sep; 32(9):2799-2805. PubMed ID: 28587888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The 21- to 27-year results of the Harris-Galante cementless total hip arthroplasty.
Kawamura H; Mishima H; Sugaya H; Nishino T; Shimizu Y; Miyakawa S
J Orthop Sci; 2016 May; 21(3):342-7. PubMed ID: 26970833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Major acetabular defects treated with the Burch-Schneider antiprotrusion cage and impaction bone allograft in a large series: a 5- to 7- year follow-up study.
Marx A; Beier A; Richter A; Lohmann CH; Halder AM
Hip Int; 2016 Nov; 26(6):585-590. PubMed ID: 27646509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Acetabular revision. The role of rings and cages.
Schatzker J; Wong MK
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Dec; (369):187-97. PubMed ID: 10611874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The Müller acetabular reinforcement ring--still an option in acetabular revision of Paprosky 2 defects? Longterm results after 10 years.
Kösters C; Schliemann B; Decking D; Simon U; Zurstegge M; Decking J
Acta Orthop Belg; 2015 Jun; 81(2):257-63. PubMed ID: 26280965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Acetabular revision with the Burch-Schnieder antiprotrusio cage and cancellous allograft bone.
Peters CL; Curtain M; Samuelson KM
J Arthroplasty; 1995 Jun; 10(3):307-12. PubMed ID: 7673909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Tantalum Augments Combined with Antiprotrusio Cages for Massive Acetabular Defects in Revision Arthroplasty.
Baecker H; Hardt S; Abdel MP; Perka C
Arthroplast Today; 2020 Dec; 6(4):704-709. PubMed ID: 32923554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Poldi-Čech cemented femoral stem in total hip arthroplasty after 25 years].
Rozkydal Z; Janíček P
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2010 Aug; 77(4):284-90. PubMed ID: 21059325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Aneurysm of the femoral artery caused by aseptic loosening and migration of a Burch-Schneider cage.
Mittag F; Kluba T
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Jan; 24(1):159.e9-159.e12. PubMed ID: 18534402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Prevention of prothesis dislocation after the revision of total hip arthroplasty].
Li YJ; Zhang LC; Yang GJ; Zhang CC; Wang WL; Lin RX; Cai CY
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2008 Mar; 21(3):173-5. PubMed ID: 19105429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
