126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11112187)
41. Reconstruction of acetabular defects with porous tantalum shells and augments in revision total hip arthroplasty at ten-year follow-up.
Löchel J; Janz V; Hipfl C; Perka C; Wassilew GI
Bone Joint J; 2019 Mar; 101-B(3):311-316. PubMed ID: 30813786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Total hip arthroplasty survival in femoral head avascular necrosis versus primary hip osteoarthritis: Case-control study with a mean 10-year follow-up after anatomical cementless metal-on-metal 28-mm replacement.
Ancelin D; Reina N; Cavaignac E; Delclaux S; Chiron P
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2016 Dec; 102(8):1029-1034. PubMed ID: 28341264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The Freeman femoral component with hydroxyapatite coating and retention of the neck: an update with a minimum follow-up of 17 years.
Mannan K; Freeman MA; Scott G
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Apr; 92(4):480-5. PubMed ID: 20357321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Acetabular revision with the Contour antiprotrusio cage: 2- to 5-year followup.
Bostrom MP; Lehman AP; Buly RL; Lyman S; Nestor BJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Dec; 453():188-94. PubMed ID: 17016217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. [Acetabular revision arthroplasty using antiprotrusio cage].
Qian WW; Weng XS; Lin J; Jin J; Zhai JL; Li H; Bian YY
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Jul; 48(14):1074-82. PubMed ID: 21055111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. [Long-term results of the CLS acetabular cup in primary total hip replacement].
Rozkydal Z; Janícek P; Tomás T; Florian Z
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Apr; 76(2):90-7. PubMed ID: 19439127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. A 2- to 7-Year Follow-Up of a Modular Iliac Screw Cup in Major Acetabular Defects: Clinical, Radiographic and Survivorship Analysis With Comparison to the Literature.
Cadossi M; Garcia FL; Sambri A; Andreoli I; Dallari D; Pignatti G
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jan; 32(1):207-213. PubMed ID: 27449716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Antiprotrusio cages for acetabular revision.
Berry DJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2004 Mar; (420):106-12. PubMed ID: 15057085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Long-Term Results of Acetabular Reconstruction Using Ganz Acetabular Rings.
Beckmann NA; Hasler JF; Moradi B; Schlegel UJ; Gotterbarm T; Streit MR
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Nov; 33(11):3524-3530. PubMed ID: 30060906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. An analysis of stably fixed femoral components retained during revision total hip arthroplasty.
Cho HJ; Han SB; Park JH; Park SW
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1239-44. PubMed ID: 21435820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The use of customized cages in revision total hip arthroplasty for Paprosky type III acetabular bone defects.
Mao Y; Xu C; Xu J; Li H; Liu F; Yu D; Zhu Z
Int Orthop; 2015 Oct; 39(10):2023-30. PubMed ID: 26285669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Revision cup arthroplasty using Burch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage.
van Koeveringe AJ; Ochsner PE
Int Orthop; 2002; 26(5):291-5. PubMed ID: 12378356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The Role of Highly Selective Implant Retention in the Infected Hip Arthroplasty.
El-Husseiny M; Haddad FS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2157-63. PubMed ID: 27334323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Uncemented jumbo cups for revision total hip arthroplasty: a concise follow-up, at a mean of twenty years, of a previous report.
von Roth P; Abdel MP; Harmsen WS; Berry DJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Feb; 97(4):284-7. PubMed ID: 25695978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Satisfying Results of Primary Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Hip Dysplasia at a Mean Followup of 20 Years.
Colo E; Rijnen WH; Gardeniers JW; van Kampen A; Schreurs BW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Nov; 474(11):2462-2468. PubMed ID: 27492686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Primary hybrid total hip replacement, performed with insertion of the acetabular component without cement and a precoat femoral component with cement. An average ten-year follow-up study.
Clohisy JC; Harris WH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Feb; 81(2):247-55. PubMed ID: 10073588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Long-term results of anti-protrusion cage and massive allografts for the management of periprosthetic acetabular bone loss.
Regis D; Magnan B; Sandri A; Bartolozzi P
J Arthroplasty; 2008 Sep; 23(6):826-32. PubMed ID: 18534526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. The Burch-Schneider cage for reconstruction after metastatic destruction of the acetabulum: outcome and complications.
Hoell S; Dedy N; Gosheger G; Dieckmann R; Daniilidis K; Hardes J
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2012 Mar; 132(3):405-10. PubMed ID: 21755467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Mid-term results of third-generation alumina-on-alumina ceramic bearings in cementless total hip arthroplasty: a ten-year minimum follow-up.
Yeung E; Bott PT; Chana R; Jackson MP; Holloway I; Walter WL; Zicat BA; Walter WK
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jan; 94(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 22258000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Cementless Cup Supporter and Iliac Autograft: A Minimum of 15-Year Follow-Up.
Yoshino K; Tsukeoka T; Tsuneizumi Y; Lee TH; Nakamura J; Suzuki M; Ohtori S
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Nov; 32(11):3495-3501. PubMed ID: 28697865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
