138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11113942)
1. Exact sequential tests for single samples of discrete responses using spending functions.
Stallard N; Todd S
Stat Med; 2000 Nov; 19(22):3051-64. PubMed ID: 11113942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A useful design utilizing the information fraction in a group sequential clinical trial with censored survival data.
Hsu CY; Chen CH; Hsu KN; Lu YH
Biometrics; 2019 Mar; 75(1):133-143. PubMed ID: 30004574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Coupled error spending functions for parallel bivariate sequential tests.
Cook RJ
Biometrics; 1996 Jun; 52(2):442-50. PubMed ID: 8672698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Confidence intervals following group sequential tests in clinical trials.
Kim K; DeMets DL
Biometrics; 1987 Dec; 43(4):857-64. PubMed ID: 3427170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A free gift: an adaptive strategy in a single-arm trial using an exact test through the binomial distribution.
Wang J
J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(6):1127-36. PubMed ID: 23075012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stratified Fisher's exact test and its sample size calculation.
Jung SH
Biom J; 2014 Jan; 56(1):129-40. PubMed ID: 24395208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On adaptive error spending approach for group sequential trials with random information levels.
Liu Q; Lim P; Nuamah I; Li Y
J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(4):687-99. PubMed ID: 22651109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Exact group-sequential designs for clinical trials with randomized play-the-winner allocation.
Stallard N; Rosenberger WF
Stat Med; 2002 Feb; 21(4):467-80. PubMed ID: 11836730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How order affects the sign test.
Rayner JC; Best DJ
Biometrics; 1997 Dec; 53(4):1416-21. PubMed ID: 9453784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Construction of a continuous stopping boundary from an alpha spending function.
Betensky RA
Biometrics; 1998 Sep; 54(3):1061-71. PubMed ID: 9750252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Group sequential designs for negative binomial outcomes.
Mütze T; Glimm E; Schmidli H; Friede T
Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Aug; 28(8):2326-2347. PubMed ID: 29770729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bayesian hypothesis testing in two-arm trials with dichotomous outcomes.
Zaslavsky BG
Biometrics; 2013 Mar; 69(1):157-63. PubMed ID: 23002906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Group sequential large sample T2-like chi2 tests for multivariate observations.
Lachin JM; Greenhouse SW; Bautista OM
Stat Med; 2003 Nov; 22(21):3357-68. PubMed ID: 14566920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Exact tests using two correlated binomial variables in contemporary cancer clinical trials.
Yu J; Kepner JL; Iyer R
Biom J; 2009 Dec; 51(6):899-914. PubMed ID: 20014199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Regarding Paper "Stratified Fisher's exact test and its sample size calculation".
Martín-Andrés A; Herranz-Tejedor I
Biom J; 2015 Sep; 57(5):930. PubMed ID: 26059610
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Sample size calculations for noninferiority trials with Poisson distributed count data.
Stucke K; Kieser M
Biom J; 2013 Mar; 55(2):203-16. PubMed ID: 23401289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Small-sample estimation of negative binomial dispersion, with applications to SAGE data.
Robinson MD; Smyth GK
Biostatistics; 2008 Apr; 9(2):321-32. PubMed ID: 17728317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A note on P-values under group sequential testing and nonproportional hazards.
Gillen DL; Emerson SS
Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):546-51. PubMed ID: 16011703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Group sequential clinical trials with triangular continuation regions.
Whitehead J; Stratton I
Biometrics; 1983 Mar; 39(1):227-36. PubMed ID: 6871351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sample size calculation for planning group sequential longitudinal trials.
Liu A; Boyett JM; Xiong X
Stat Med; 2000 Jan; 19(2):205-20. PubMed ID: 10641025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
