208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11114666)
1. Intra-oral storage phosphor and conventional radiography in the assessment of alveolar bone structures.
Kaeppler G; Vogel A; Axmann-Krcmar D
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Nov; 29(6):362-7. PubMed ID: 11114666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measurement accuracy and perceived quality of imaging systems for the evaluation of periodontal structures.
Baksi BG
Odontology; 2008 Jul; 96(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 18661206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of dose reduction on the detection of anatomical structures on panoramic radiographs.
Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Reinert S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):271-7. PubMed ID: 16798925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the reproducibility of storage phosphor and film bitewings for assessment of alveolar bone loss.
Henriksson CH; Stermer EM; Aass AM; Sandvik L; Møystad A
Acta Odontol Scand; 2008; 66(6):380-4. PubMed ID: 18932094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of observer reliability in assessing alveolar bone height on direct digital and conventional radiographs.
Pecoraro M; Azadivatan-le N; Janal M; Khocht A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 Sep; 34(5):279-84. PubMed ID: 16120877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The accuracy and reliability of radiographic methods for the assessment of marginal bone level around oral implants.
De Smet E; Jacobs R; Gijbels F; Naert I
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 May; 31(3):176-81. PubMed ID: 12058265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Observer performance based on marginal bone tissue visibility in Scanora panoramic radiography and posterior bitewing radiography.
Ivanauskaite D; Lindh C; Rohlin M
Stomatologija; 2008; 10(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18493164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Marginal bone levels measured in film and digital radiographs corrected for attenuation and visual response: an in vivo study.
Li G; Engström PE; Nasström K; Lü ZY; Sanderink G; Welander U
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jan; 36(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 17329581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality of digital pre-implant tomography: comparison of film-screen images with storage phosphor images at normal and low dose.
Ekestubbe A; Gröndahl HG; Molander B
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Sep; 32(5):322-6. PubMed ID: 14709608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Periodontal disease morbidity quantification. II. Validation of alveolar bone loss measurements and vertical defect diagnosis from digital bite-wing images.
Hildebolt CF; Vannier MW; Shrout MK; Pilgram TK; Province M; Vahey EP; Rietz DW
J Periodontol; 1990 Oct; 61(10):623-32. PubMed ID: 2231229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Digital subtraction radiography for detecting cortical and cancellous bone changes in the periapical region.
Tyndall DA; Kapa SF; Bagnell CP
J Endod; 1990 Apr; 16(4):173-8. PubMed ID: 2074408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Subjective image quality of digitally filtered radiographs acquired by the Dürr Vistascan system compared with conventional radiographs.
Yalcinkaya S; Künzel A; Willers R; Thoms M; Becker J
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 May; 101(5):643-51. PubMed ID: 16632278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison between Scanora panoramic radiography and bitewing radiography in the assessment of marginal bone tissue.
Ivanauskaite D; Lindh C; Rangne K; Rohlin M
Stomatologija; 2006; 8(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 16687909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro evaluation of the XR-15 portable x-ray unit for forensic odontology.
Varghese S; Kimmel A; Radmer T; Bradley TG; Bahcall J
J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2004 Jun; 22(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 16223025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of linear measurements before and after digitizing periapical and panoramic radiography images.
Langlois Cde O; Sampaio MC; Silva AE; Costa NP; Rockenbach MI
Braz Dent J; 2011; 22(5):404-9. PubMed ID: 22011897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computer-assisted subtraction radiography in periodontal diagnosis.
Gröndahl K
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1987; 50():1-44. PubMed ID: 3321498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of direct digital and conventional intraoral radiographs in detecting alveolar bone loss.
Khocht A; Janal M; Harasty L; Chang KM
J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Nov; 134(11):1468-75. PubMed ID: 14664265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of linear measurements made from storage phosphor and dental radiographs.
Conover GL; Hildebolt CF; Yokoyama-Crothers N
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Nov; 25(5):268-73. PubMed ID: 9161181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Panoramic radiography in the assessment of the marginal bone level.
Akesson L
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1991; 78():1-129. PubMed ID: 1896925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comprehensive in vitro study of image accuracy and quality for periodontal diagnosis. Part 2: the influence of intra-oral image receptor on periodontal measurements.
Vandenberghe B; Bosmans H; Yang J; Jacobs R
Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Aug; 15(4):551-62. PubMed ID: 20461423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
