These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11115298)

  • 1. Bad science and the role of institutional review boards.
    Silverman WA
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2000 Dec; 154(12):1183-4. PubMed ID: 11115298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Institutional review boards: informed consent and clinical trial ethics.
    Hunter TH
    Drug Inf J; 1982; 16(1-2):56-9. PubMed ID: 10260016
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Institutional review boards: a crisis in confidence.
    Levine RJ
    Ann Intern Med; 2001 Jan; 134(2):161-3. PubMed ID: 11177321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ethical issues arising from medical research.
    Hamilton MP
    Isr J Med Sci; 1983 May; 19(5):431-6. PubMed ID: 6345463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Review boards: a system 'in jeopardy'?
    Marshall E
    Science; 1998 Jun; 280(5371):1830-1. PubMed ID: 9669930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomedical ethics. HHS plans to overhaul clinical research rules.
    Marshall E
    Science; 2000 May; 288(5470):1315-6. PubMed ID: 10847836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Informed consent and approval by institutional review boards in published reports on clinical trials.
    Ruiz-Canela M; Martínez-González MA; Gómez-Gracia E; Fernández-Crehuet J
    N Engl J Med; 1999 Apr; 340(14):1114-5. PubMed ID: 10206829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Waivers proposed for emergency studies.
    Wolfgang L
    Science; 1995 Oct; 270(5233):25-6. PubMed ID: 7569946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Problems with Institutional Review Board inconsistency.
    Veatch RM
    JAMA; 1982 Jul; 248(2):179-80. PubMed ID: 7045427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Institutional review boards.
    Levine RJ
    BMJ; 1989 May; 298(6683):1268-9. PubMed ID: 2500193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Role of ethical guidance committees in clinical research.
    Breuer H; Fischer FW
    Control Clin Trials; 1981 May; 1(4):421-7. PubMed ID: 7261633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of local institutional review boards in protecting human research subjects.
    Burman WJ; Schooley RT
    JAMA; 2001 Jun; 285(21):2713. PubMed ID: 11386919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Panel faults research consent process.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1995 Oct; 270(5233):25. PubMed ID: 7569945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Institutional review boards and medical devices.
    Less JR; Alpert S; Nightingale SL
    JAMA; 1994 Sep; 272(12):968-9. PubMed ID: 8084066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Oversight mechanisms for clinical research.
    Snyderman R; Holmes EW
    Science; 2000 Jan; 287(5453):595-7. PubMed ID: 10691540
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risks, benefits, and conflicts of interest in human research: ethical evolution in the changing world of science.
    Koski G
    J Law Med Ethics; 2000; 28(4):330-1. PubMed ID: 11317425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Variability among institutional review boards and the value of local research context.
    Clark DC
    Crit Care Med; 2001 Feb; 29(2):444-5. PubMed ID: 11246330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The ethical analysis of risk.
    Weijer C
    J Law Med Ethics; 2000; 28(4):344-61. PubMed ID: 11317427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Defining and describing benefit appropriately in clinical trials.
    King NM
    J Law Med Ethics; 2000; 28(4):332-43. PubMed ID: 11317426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perspectives of research participants, psychologist investigators, and institutional review boards.
    Schreier BA; Stadler HA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1992 Jun; 74(3 Pt 2):1067-72. PubMed ID: 1501970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.