These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11116383)

  • 1. Identifying influences on model uncertainty: an application using a forest carbon budget model.
    Smith JE; Heath LS
    Environ Manage; 2001 Feb; 27(2):253-67. PubMed ID: 11116383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Parameter sensitivity and uncertainty of the forest carbon flux model FORUG: a Monte Carlo analysis.
    Verbeeck H; Samson R; Verdonck F; Lemeur R
    Tree Physiol; 2006 Jun; 26(6):807-17. PubMed ID: 16510397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Methodology for estimating soil carbon for the forest carbon budget model of the United States, 2001.
    Heath LS; Birdsey RA; Williams DW
    Environ Pollut; 2002; 116(3):373-80. PubMed ID: 11822715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Issues of replicability in Monte Carlo modeling: a case study with a pesticide leaching model.
    Dubus IG; Janssen PH
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2003 Dec; 22(12):3081-7. PubMed ID: 14713053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Uncertainty in predictions of forest carbon dynamics: separating driver error from model error.
    Spadavecchia L; Williams M; Law BE
    Ecol Appl; 2011 Jul; 21(5):1506-22. PubMed ID: 21830698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A combined Monte Carlo and possibilistic approach to uncertainty propagation in event tree analysis.
    Baraldi P; Zio E
    Risk Anal; 2008 Oct; 28(5):1309-26. PubMed ID: 18631304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Probabilistic biosphere modeling for the long-term safety assessment of geological disposal facilities for radioactive waste using first- and second-order Monte Carlo simulation.
    Ciecior W; Röhlig KJ; Kirchner G
    J Environ Radioact; 2018 Oct; 190-191():10-19. PubMed ID: 29734123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Application of variance-based uncertainty and sensitivity analysis to biological modeling in carbon ion treatment plans.
    Kamp F; Wilkens JJ
    Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):437-447. PubMed ID: 30471124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating uncertainty in terrestrial critical loads and their exceedances at four sites in the UK.
    Skeffington RA; Whitehead PG; Heywood E; Hall JR; Wadsworth RA; Reynolds B
    Sci Total Environ; 2007 Sep; 382(2-3):199-213. PubMed ID: 17555799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-Effectiveness Uncertainty Analysis Methods: A Comparison of One-Way Sensitivity, Analysis of Covariance, and Expected Value of Partial Perfect Information.
    Campbell JD; McQueen RB; Libby AM; Spackman DE; Carlson JJ; Briggs A
    Med Decis Making; 2015 Jul; 35(5):596-607. PubMed ID: 25349188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bayesian calibration of process-based forest models: bridging the gap between models and data.
    Van Oijen M; Rougier J; Smith R
    Tree Physiol; 2005 Jul; 25(7):915-27. PubMed ID: 15870058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Probabilistic framework for the estimation of the adult and child toxicokinetic intraspecies uncertainty factors.
    Pelekis M; Nicolich MJ; Gauthier JS
    Risk Anal; 2003 Dec; 23(6):1239-55. PubMed ID: 14641898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contribution of crop model structure, parameters and climate projections to uncertainty in climate change impact assessments.
    Tao F; Rötter RP; Palosuo T; Gregorio Hernández Díaz-Ambrona C; Mínguez MI; Semenov MA; Kersebaum KC; Nendel C; Specka X; Hoffmann H; Ewert F; Dambreville A; Martre P; Rodríguez L; Ruiz-Ramos M; Gaiser T; Höhn JG; Salo T; Ferrise R; Bindi M; Cammarano D; Schulman AH
    Glob Chang Biol; 2018 Mar; 24(3):1291-1307. PubMed ID: 29245185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Propagation of uncertainty in nasal spray in vitro performance models using Monte Carlo simulation: part I. Model prediction using Monte Carlo simulation.
    Guo C; Doub WH; Kauffman JF
    J Pharm Sci; 2010 Apr; 99(4):2114-22. PubMed ID: 19902528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Uncertainty analysis in probabilistic design of detention rockfill dams using Monte-Carlo simulation model and probabilistic frequency analysis of stability factors.
    Riyahi MM; Riahi-Madvar H
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Feb; 30(10):28035-28052. PubMed ID: 36385345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computational methods for probabilistic decision trees.
    Clark DE
    Comput Biomed Res; 1997 Feb; 30(1):19-33. PubMed ID: 9134304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of harvest and information needs for North American sea ducks.
    Koneff MD; Zimmerman GS; Dwyer CP; Fleming KK; Padding PI; Devers PK; Johnson FA; Runge MC; Roberts AJ
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175411. PubMed ID: 28419113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relative information contributions of model vs. data to short- and long-term forecasts of forest carbon dynamics.
    Weng E; Luo Y
    Ecol Appl; 2011 Jul; 21(5):1490-505. PubMed ID: 21830697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Harnessing the theoretical foundations of the exponential and beta-Poisson dose-response models to quantify parameter uncertainty using Markov Chain Monte Carlo.
    Schmidt PJ; Pintar KD; Fazil AM; Topp E
    Risk Anal; 2013 Sep; 33(9):1677-93. PubMed ID: 23311599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using information on uncertainty to improve environmental fate modeling: a case study on DDT.
    Schenker U; Scheringer M; Sohn MD; Maddalena RL; McKone TE; Hungerbühler K
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Jan; 43(1):128-34. PubMed ID: 19209595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.