These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11117682)

  • 1. Neurosensory differences after wire and rigid fixation in patients with mandibular advancement.
    Lemke RR; Rugh JD; Van Sickels J; Bays RA; Clark GM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Dec; 58(12):1354-9; discussion 1359-60. PubMed ID: 11117682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Skeletal stability after mandibular advancement with rigid versus wire fixation.
    Dolce C; Van Sickels JE; Bays RA; Rugh JD
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Nov; 58(11):1219-27; discussion 1227-8. PubMed ID: 11078132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparative study of skeletal and dental stability between rigid and wire fixation for mandibular advancement.
    Keeling SD; Dolce C; Van Sickels JE; Bays RA; Clark GM; Rugh JD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jun; 117(6):638-49. PubMed ID: 10842106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maintenance of soft tissue changes after rigid versus wire fixation for mandibular advancement, with and without genioplasty.
    Dolce C; Johnson PD; Van Sickels JE; Bays RA; Rugh JD
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Aug; 92(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 11505259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Masticatory function and neurosensory disturbance after mandibular correction by bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a comparison between miniplate and bicortical screw rigid internal fixation.
    Yamashita Y; Mizuashi K; Shigematsu M; Goto M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Feb; 36(2):118-22. PubMed ID: 17150332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neurosensory alteration in the lower lip and chin area after orthognathic surgery: bilateral sagittal split osteotomy versus inverted L ramus osteotomy.
    Kobayashi A; Yoshimasu H; Kobayashi J; Amagasa T
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 May; 64(5):778-84. PubMed ID: 16631484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recovery of nerve injury after mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. Diagnostic value of clinical and electrophysiologic tests in the follow-up.
    Teerijoki-Oksa T; Jääskeläinen SK; Forssell K; Forssell H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Mar; 33(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 15050068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of lower lip hypoesthesia measured by trigeminal somatosensory-evoked potential between different types of mandibular osteotomies and fixation.
    Hashiba Y; Ueki K; Marukawa K; Shimada M; Yoshida K; Shimizu C; Alam S; Nakagawa K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Aug; 104(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 17448708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neurosensory disturbances one year after bilateral sagittal split mandibular ramus osteotomy performed with separators.
    van Merkesteyn JP; Zweers A; Corputty JE
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2007; 35(4-5):222-6. PubMed ID: 17681774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of alveolar nerve function after surgical lengthening of the mandible by a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy or distraction osteogenesis.
    Baas EM; de Lange J; Horsthuis RB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jun; 39(6):529-33. PubMed ID: 20430586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mandibular range of motion after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy with wire osteosynthesis or rigid fixation.
    Hatch JP; Van Sickels JE; Rugh JD; Dolce C; Bays RA; Sakai S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Mar; 91(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 11250623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is the use of arch bars or interdental wire fixation necessary for successful outcomes in the open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular angle fractures?
    Bell RB; Wilson DM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 66(10):2116-22. PubMed ID: 18848111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neurosensory deficits after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy of the mandible--influence of soft tissue handling medial to the ascending ramus.
    Panula K; Finne K; Oikarinen K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Sep; 33(6):543-8. PubMed ID: 15308252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patients' evaluation of the final result of sagittal split osteotomy: is it influenced by impaired sensitivity of the lower lip and chin?
    Westermark A; Bystedt H; von Konow L
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1999; 14(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 10686836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Plate fixation of extra-oral subcondylar ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism: clinical aspects and short term stability.
    Høgevold HE; Mobarak KA; Espeland L; Krogstad O; Skjelbred P
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2001 Aug; 29(4):205-11; discussion 212-3. PubMed ID: 11562089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of methods to assess neurosensory alterations following orthognathic surgery.
    Jones DL; Wolford LM; Hartog JM
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1990; 5(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 2373911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stabilisation of sagittal split advancement osteotomies with miniplates: a prospective, multicentre study with two-year follow-up. Part III--condylar remodelling and resorption.
    Borstlap WA; Stoelinga PJ; Hoppenreijs TJ; van't Hof MA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Oct; 33(7):649-55. PubMed ID: 15337177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical audit on the incidence of inferior alveolar nerve dysfunction following mandibular sagittal split osteotomies at the Derby Royal Infirmary, England.
    Yip L; Korczak P
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(4):266-71. PubMed ID: 12390004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-lasting neurosensory disturbance following advancement of the retrognathic mandible: distraction osteogenesis versus bilateral sagittal split osteotomy.
    Wijbenga JG; Verlinden CR; Jansma J; Becking AG; Stegenga B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 38(7):719-25. PubMed ID: 19394196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Technical factors accounting for stability of a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy advancement: wire osteosynthesis versus rigid fixation.
    Van Sickels JE; Dolce C; Keeling S; Tiner BD; Clark GM; Rugh JD
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Jan; 89(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 10630936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.