399 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11117784)
1. Should a Gleason score be assigned to a minute focus of carcinoma on prostate biopsy?
Rubin MA; Dunn R; Kambham N; Misick CP; O'Toole KM
Am J Surg Pathol; 2000 Dec; 24(12):1634-40. PubMed ID: 11117784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy.
Sebo TJ; Bock BJ; Cheville JC; Lohse C; Wollan P; Zincke H
J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 10604340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relationship and significance of greatest percentage of tumor and perineural invasion on needle biopsy in prostatic adenocarcinoma.
Rubin MA; Bassily N; Sanda M; Montie J; Strawderman MS; Wojno K
Am J Surg Pathol; 2000 Feb; 24(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 10680885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gleason grading of prostatic needle biopsies. Correlation with grade in 316 matched prostatectomies.
Bostwick DG
Am J Surg Pathol; 1994 Aug; 18(8):796-803. PubMed ID: 8037294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of extraprostatic extension of prostate cancer based on needle biopsy findings: perineural invasion lacks significance on multivariate analysis.
Egan AJ; Bostwick DG
Am J Surg Pathol; 1997 Dec; 21(12):1496-500. PubMed ID: 9414194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictors of Gleason pattern 4/5 prostate cancer on prostatectomy specimens: can high grade tumor be predicted preoperatively?
Rubin MA; Mucci NR; Manley S; Sanda M; Cushenberry E; Strawderman M; Montie JE; Bassily NH
J Urol; 2001 Jan; 165(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 11125378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlation of the primary Gleason pattern on prostate needle biopsy with clinico-pathological factors in Gleason 7 tumors.
Grober ED; Tsihlias J; Jewett MA; Sweet JM; Evans AJ; Trachtenberg J; Robinette M; Nam RK
Can J Urol; 2004 Feb; 11(1):2157-62. PubMed ID: 15003158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adenocarcinoma of the prostate with Gleason score 9-10 on core biopsy: correlation with findings at radical prostatectomy and prognosis.
Ellis CL; Partin AW; Han M; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2068-73. PubMed ID: 23727307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic significance of preoperative factors in localized prostate carcinoma treated with radical prostatectomy: importance of percentage of biopsies that contain tumor and the presence of biopsy perineural invasion.
Quinn DI; Henshall SM; Brenner PC; Kooner R; Golovsky D; O'Neill GF; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Grygiel JJ; Sutherland RL; Stricker PD
Cancer; 2003 Apr; 97(8):1884-93. PubMed ID: 12673714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relationship between systematic biopsies and histological features of 222 radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of prediction of tumor significance for men with nonpalpable prostate cancer.
Noguchi M; Stamey TA; McNeal JE; Yemoto CM
J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):104-9; discussion 109-10. PubMed ID: 11435833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.
Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minute focus of prostate cancer on needle biopsy: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimen.
Montanari E; Del Nero A; Gazzano G; Mangiarotti B; Bernardini P; Longo F; Cordima G; Itri E
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2009 Mar; 81(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 19499751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predicting prostate carcinoma volume and stage at radical prostatectomy by assessing needle biopsy specimens for percent surface area and cores positive for carcinoma, perineural invasion, Gleason score, DNA ploidy and proliferation, and preoperative serum prostate specific antigen: a report of 454 cases.
Sebo TJ; Cheville JC; Riehle DL; Lohse CM; Pankratz VS; Myers RP; Blute ML; Zincke H
Cancer; 2001 Jun; 91(11):2196-204. PubMed ID: 11391602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tertiary Gleason pattern 5 is a powerful predictor of biochemical relapse in patients with Gleason score 7 prostatic adenocarcinoma.
Hattab EM; Koch MO; Eble JN; Lin H; Cheng L
J Urol; 2006 May; 175(5):1695-9; discussion 1699. PubMed ID: 16600733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Increasing the number of biopsies increases the concordance of Gleason scores of needle biopsies and prostatectomy specimens.
Divrik RT; Eroglu A; Sahin A; Zorlu F; Ozen H
Urol Oncol; 2007; 25(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 17826653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gleason scores in prostate needle biopsy and prostatectomy specimens in prostatic adenocarcinoma: A correlation study.
Awang A; Md Isa N; Yunus R; Azhar Shah S; Md Pauzi SH
Malays J Pathol; 2019 Dec; 41(3):253-257. PubMed ID: 31901909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Extended prostate biopsy scheme improves reliability of Gleason grading: implications for radiotherapy patients.
King CR; McNeal JE; Gill H; Presti JC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Jun; 59(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 15145152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gleason score 7 prostate cancer on needle biopsy: is the prognostic difference in Gleason scores 4 + 3 and 3 + 4 independent of the number of involved cores?
Makarov DV; Sanderson H; Partin AW; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2002 Jun; 167(6):2440-2. PubMed ID: 11992053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correlation of minute (0.5 MM or less) focus of prostate adenocarcinoma on needle biopsy with radical prostatectomy specimen: role of prostate specific antigen density.
Allan RW; Sanderson H; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2003 Aug; 170(2 Pt 1):370-2. PubMed ID: 12853777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Discrepancy between Gleason scores of biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
Köksal IT; Ozcan F; Kadioglu TC; Esen T; Kiliçaslan I; Tunç M
Eur Urol; 2000 Jun; 37(6):670-4. PubMed ID: 10828666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
